Evaluation Design Plan Sample Clauses

Evaluation Design Plan. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, SMI, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing, the missed appointment fee evaluation requirements, the uncompensated care payments to IHS and 638 facilities and the CRS and SMI integration programs as described further in subparagraphs (c) - (f). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment B – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the state. The state must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by April 1, 2015, in order to include the evaluation requirements outlined in subparagraph (e) – (g).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Design Plan. The State must submit to CMS for approval a draft evaluation design no later April 1, 2012. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing, the missed appointment fee evaluation requirements, the uncompensated care payments to IHS and 638 facilities and the CRS and SMI integration programs as described further in subparagraphs (c) - (f). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the Demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment C – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the Demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the State. The State must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by April 1, 2013, in order to include the specific hypotheses outlined in subparagraph (e).
Evaluation Design Plan. The State must submit to CMS for approval a draft evaluation design no later April 1, 2012. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing and missed appointment fee evaluation requirements as described further in subparagraphs (c) and (d). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the Demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment C – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the Demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the State. The State must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by June 1, 2012, in order to include the specific hypotheses outlined in subparagraph (e).

Related to Evaluation Design Plan

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority

  • Evaluation Forms a. Performance evaluation forms will at a minimum include the following:

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Development Plans 4.3.1 For each Licensed Indication and corresponding Licensed Product in the Field, Licensee will prepare and deliver to Licensor a development plan and budget (each a “Development Plan”). The initial Development Plans for each Licensed Indication will be delivered within […***…] after the Grant Date for such Licensed Indication.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.