Evaluation Sample Clauses

Evaluation. 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

Evaluation. Either Party may, on an annual basis, request the participation of the other Party to review the effectiveness of this Agreement and to consider potential amendments to it.

Evaluation. Documents and shall, when approved by the Commissioner, be considered a part of the Bid and of any resulting Contract. All symbols and other representations appearing on the drawings shall be considered a part of the drawing.

Evaluation. Whenever the Commission carries out an interim or final evaluation of the action's impact measured against the objectives of the Community programme concerned, the beneficiary undertakes to make available to the Commission and/or persons authorised by it all such documents or information as will allow the evaluation to be successfully completed and to give them the rights of access specified in Article II.19.

Evaluation. In addition to the evaluation of the effectiveness of specific mentorship arrangements in relation to pre-established goals and expectations: ❑ The Committee responsible for addressing professional development issues for nurses pursuant to Article 9.02 will be responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding the application of, and effectiveness of, mentorship relationships within the hospital. ❑ The employer also has a responsibility for evaluating the effectiveness of mentorship arrangements and, therefore, review and evaluation of arrangements should be conducted on a regular basis. Note: it is mutually understood that these guidelines are “without prejudice” to either parties’ position with respect to the role of a nurse whose job duties normally include responsibility for teaching and/or educating other nurses.

Evaluation. The ongoing process of defining goals and identifying, gathering, and using information as part of a process to improve professional performance (the “formative evaluation” and “formative assessment”) and to assess total job effectiveness and make personnel decisions (the “summative evaluation”).

Evaluation. The evaluation of the activities performed under this Agreement shall be subject to the provisions of the UNICEF Evaluation Policy as from time to time approved or amended by UNICEF’s Executive Board.

Evaluation. 15.1 Formal evaluation including a conference must be made a minimum of once every two (2) years. Employees should be provided with feedback on their performance each year. The appropriate standard evaluation form will normally be used every other year. In a year when the appropriate standard form is not used, the feedback shall have no rating attached to it. In any fiscal year in which an employee is not evaluated, it shall be assumed the employee’s performance was no less than the last rated evaluation. 15.2 The evaluation shall be based on the conclusions and assessments reached by the evaluator. In the event an employee is assigned to more than one (1) location, the home administrator shall be responsible for submitting the evaluation form. All administrators should provide input to the home administrator prior to the completion of the form. 15.3 The evaluation shall be based on observations of the employee’s work performance. Less than satisfactory performance shall be discussed with the employee. Specific suggestions for improvement shall be given so that the employee may have an opportunity and sufficient time, as indicated by the appraisal team, to improve. 15.4 Provision shall be made for an overall assessment by the evaluator which clearly indicates a satisfactory or unsatisfactory rating. No employee shall receive a rating on the evaluation less than satisfactory without having received earlier written suggestions for improvement in the area of weakness and having been given an opportunity to show improvement. An overall evaluation rating may not be lower than the previous rating unless the employee has received advanced warning of a possible reduction and an opportunity to show the necessary improvement. 15.5 The written evaluation report shall be shown to the employee within ten (10) days subsequent to the aforementioned conference. The employee shall sign the report within three (3) days and receive a copy thereof. Such signature will not, however, necessarily indicate agreement with the evaluation. Provision shall be made for written comments and reactions by the employee which shall be attached and become a part of the evaluation report. 15.6 Matters relating to evaluation may be subject to the grievance procedure only for reasons of arbitrariness or failure to follow procedure.

Evaluation a. Contract Faculty Evaluation i. Commencing with his/her first contract, a contract faculty member shall be subject to formal evaluation in accordance with this Article, to a maximum of two (2) separate evaluations per academic year. ii. Contract faculty evaluations will include all elements of a probationary regular faculty evaluation, excluding regular faculty service requirements, and will be consistent with the role of a contract faculty member. iii. Where a contract faculty member receives two (2) consecutive unsatisfactory evaluations in two (2) different semesters, he/she shall be terminated at the end of his/her existing contract. b. Regular Faculty Evaluation i. Probationary Regular Faculty (1) All evaluations during the probationary period shall be as follows: (a) A minimum of once per year, but (b) No more than twice per year with a minimum of sixty (60) days between and (c) The Responsible Administrator will give the faculty member a written evaluation report, after consultation with the current Selection Committee. The evaluation report shall explicitly state whether the faculty member is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the faculty member is found to be unsatisfactory for regular employment, then the evaluation report shall specify the deficiencies and shall make positive suggestions for each. The standards will be determined by the College. (2) The methods used to collect information will be provided to the faculty member in writing before the evaluation process begins, and will include the following: (a) Written faculty member peer evaluation; (b) Written student evaluations (where applicable); (c) Written self-evaluation by the probationary faculty member; (d) Other methods agreed to by the Selection Committee and by the Responsible Administrator, in which case the probationary faculty member will be informed of such other methods in writing before the evaluation process begins; and (e) Written Responsible Administrator evaluation. (3) The peer evaluator will be appointed by the Responsible Administrator or designate (i.e., Chair/Coordinator of the DDP or Chair of the Selection Committee), who will choose without bias from a list of available faculty after consultation with the probationary faculty member and the Chair/Coordinator of the DDP. The peer evaluator shall be a post-probationary regular faculty member. Where possible, the peer evaluator shall be from the DDP and shall not be a member of the Selection Committee. In selecting e...

Evaluation. The Trustee shall make an evaluation of each Trust as of that time set forth in the Prospectus (the "Evaluation Time"), (i) on the last business day of each of the months of June and December, (ii) on the day on which any Unit of a respective Trust is tendered for redemption, and (iii) on any other day desired by the Trustee or requested by the Depositor. Such evaluations shall take into account and itemize separately, (1) the cash on hand in the respective Trust (other than cash declared held in trust to cover contracts to purchase bonds) or moneys in the process of being collected from matured interest coupons or bonds matured or called for redemption prior to maturity, (2) the value of each issue of the Bonds in the Trust, and (3) interest accrued thereon not subject to collection and distribution. In making the evaluations the Trustee may determine the value of each issue of the Bonds in the Trust by the following methods or any combination thereof which it deems appropriate: (i) on the basis of current bid prices of such Bonds as obtained from investment dealers or brokers (including the Depositor) who customarily deal in bonds comparable to those held by the Trust, or (ii) if bid prices are not available for any of such Bonds, on the basis of bid prices for comparable bonds, or (iii) by causing the value of the Bonds in the Trust to be determined by others engaged in the practice of evaluating, quoting or appraising bonds. For each such evaluation there shall be deducted from the sum of the above (i) amounts representing any applicable taxes or governmental charges payable out of the Trust and for which no deductions shall have previously been made for the purpose of addition to the Reserve Account of such Trust, (ii) amounts representing accrued expenses of the Trust including but not limited to unpaid fees and expenses of the Trustee, the Depositor and counsel, in each case as reported by the Trustee to the Depositor on or prior to the date of evaluation, (iii) amounts representing unpaid organization costs, and (iv) cash held for distribution to Unitholders of such Trust of record, and required for redemption of Units tendered, as of a date prior to the evaluation then being made. The value of the pro rata share of each Unit of such Trust determined on the basis of any such evaluation shall be referred to herein as the "Unit Value." Prior to the payment to the Depositor of its reimbursable organization costs to be made at the earlier of six months...