Common use of Evaluation of Award Clause in Contracts

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offeror’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Insights Training Group LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offeror’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Subcontract Agreement, Subcontract Agreement, Subcontract Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offerorOfferor’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials And, credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Insights Training Group Group, LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance.. Attachment 1

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Subcontract Agreement

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation solicitations and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offerorOfferor’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials And, credentials and past performance combined are more important than that cost. Insights Training Group Group, LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a the premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance.. Attachment 1

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Subcontract

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Groupgroup, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation solicitations and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offerorOfferor’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials performance and credentials and past performance combined are more important than that cost. Insights Training Group Group, LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a the premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance.. Attachment 1

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Subcontract

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offerorOfferor’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Insights Training Group LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Subcontract

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each offerorOfferor’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. Credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Insights Training Group LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the offerorOfferor’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance.. Attachment 1

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Subcontract Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!