Common use of Evaluation of Technical Proposals Clause in Contracts

Evaluation of Technical Proposals. 22.1 The Procuring Entity's evaluation committee shall evaluate the Technical Proposals that have passed the eligibility and mandatory criteria, on the basis of their responsiveness to the Terms of Reference and the RFP. The eligibility and mandatory criteria shall include the following and any other that may include in the Data sheet. a) Firm has submitted the required number of copies of the Technical Proposals. b) Firm has submitted a sealed financial proposal. c) The Proposal is valid for the required number of days. d) The Technical Proposal is signed by the person with power of attorney, without material deviation, reservation, or omission. e) The Technical Proposal is complete with all the forms and required documentary evidence submitted. f) A valid tax compliance certificate or tax exemption certificate issued by the Kenya Revenue Authority in accordance with ITT 3.14 for Kenyan firms. g) Key Experts are from eligible countries. h) Key Experts do not appear in more than one proposal, if so required. i) A short-listed firm has not participated in more than one proposal, if so required. j) The Consultant is not insolvent, in receivership, bankrupt or in the process of being wound up. k) The Consultant, its sub-consultants and experts have not engaged in or been convicted of corrupt or fraudulent practices. l) The Consultant is neither precluded from entering into a Contract nor debarred by PPRA. m) The firm has not proposed employing public officials, civil servants and employees of public institutions. n) The Consultant, its sub-consultants and experts have no conflicts of interest. 22.2 Each responsive Proposal will be given a technical score. A Proposal shall be rejected at this stage if it does not respond to important aspects of the RFP or if it fails to achieve the minimum technical score indicated in the Data Sheet.

Evaluation of Technical Proposals. 22.1 The Procuring EntityKoTDA's evaluation committee shall evaluate the Technical Proposals that have passed the eligibility and mandatory criteria, on the basis of their responsiveness to the Terms of Reference and the RFP. The eligibility and mandatory criteria shall include the following and any other that may include in the Data sheet. a) Firm has submitted the required number of copies of the Technical Proposals. b) Firm has submitted a sealed financial proposal. c) The Proposal is valid for the required number of days. d) The Technical Proposal is signed by the person with power of attorney, without material deviation, reservation, or omission. e) The Technical Proposal is complete with all the forms and required documentary evidence submitted. f) A valid tax compliance certificate or tax exemption certificate issued by the Kenya Revenue Authority in accordance with ITT 3.14 for Kenyan firms. g) Key Experts are from eligible countries. h) Key Experts do not appear in more than one proposal, if so required. i) A short-listed firm has not participated in more than one proposal, if so required. j) The Consultant Tenderer is not insolvent, in receivership, bankrupt or in the process of being wound up. k) The ConsultantTenderer, its sub-consultants tenderers and experts have not engaged in or been convicted of corrupt or fraudulent practices. l) The Consultant Tenderer is neither precluded from entering into a Contract nor debarred by PPRA. m) The firm has not proposed employing public officials, civil servants and employees of public institutions. n) The ConsultantTenderer, its sub-consultants tenderers and experts have no conflicts of interest. 22.2 Each responsive Proposal will be given a technical score. A Proposal shall be rejected at this stage if it does not respond to important aspects of the RFP or if it fails to achieve the minimum technical score indicated in the Data Sheet.