Evaluation of Tenders Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Tenders. 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Tenders. After received of Bids, Abraj evaluation Team will conduct evaluation of Bid. Technical and Commercial bids will be evaluated separately by different Evaluation Team. Tender evaluation Strategy of bids will be conducted as per Annexure-11.
Evaluation of Tenders. Preliminary examination for Determination of Responsiveness MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS S/No. Completeness and Responsiveness Criteria Requirement
Evaluation of Tenders. Preliminary examination for Determination of Responsiveness The Procuring Entity will start by examining all tenders to ensure they meet in all respects the eligibility criteria and other mandatory requirements in the ITT, and that the tender is complete in all aspects in meeting the requirements provided for in the preliminary evaluation criteria outlined below. The Standard Tender Evaluation Report Document for Goods and Works for evaluating Tenders provides very clear guide on how to deal with review of these requirements. Tenders that do not pass the Preliminary Examination will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered further.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Tenders. The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and The evaluation and award of contracts will be based on each Service Number”. Qualification Criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Best Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:
Evaluation of Tenders. 34.1 KPLC shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria in deciding to Award a Framework Agreement(s). No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. 34.2 KPLC will evaluate and compare only the Tenders determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with ITT 29. 34.3 To evaluate a Tender, KPLC shall consider the following: (a) evaluation will be done for Items or Lots, as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14; (b) price adjustment for correction of arithmetic errors in accordance with ITT 31.1; (c) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 14.4; (d) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial nonconformities in accordance with ITT 30.3; and; (e) the additional evaluation factors are specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 34.4 The Purchaser reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Tender documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Purchaser will not be taken into account in Tender evaluation. 34.5 If applicable, the estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions in the Framework Agreement(s) (which determines the Contract Price for a Call-off Contract), applied over the Term of the Framework Agreement, shall not be taken into account in the Primary Procurement Tender evaluation. 34.6 KPLC’s evaluation of a Tender will exclude and not take into account: (a) in the case of Goods manufactured in Kenya, sales and other similar taxes, which will be payable on the Goods if a Call-off Contract is awarded to the Tenderer; (b) in the case of Goods manufactured outside Kenya, already imported or to be imported, customs duties and other import taxes levied on the imported Goods sales and other similar taxes, which will be payable on the Goods if the Call-off Contract is awarded to the Tenderer; (c) if applicable, any allowance for price adjustment during the period of execution of the Call-off Contract, if provided in Section IX: Framework Agreement Specific Provisions. 34.7 The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of a Tender may require the consideration of other factors, in addition to the Tender Price quoted in accordance with ITT 14. These factors may be related to the characteristics, perf...
Evaluation of Tenders. 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!