Evaluation of the Probationer. 1. All evaluation information shall be considered confidential, subject to the Public Records Act. 2. Each tenure review committee shall evaluate only the probationer’s effectiveness in his/her appointment. In addition to the opinion of committee members, the committee can request and consider other professional judgments regarding the probationer’s effectiveness. 3. Each review committee shall consider the following nine standards in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each full-time probationer: a. The probationer’s instructional skills. b. The probationer’s relationship with students. c. The probationer’s relationship with peer faculty. d. The probationer’s relationship with administration/other staff. e. The probationer’s knowledge of subject matter. f. The probationer’s adherence to the institution’s mission, objectives, and policies. g. The probationer’s action toward professional improvement and development. h. The probationer’s action toward improvement of course outlines and classroom materials, equipment, supplies, tools and inventory. i. The probationer’s adherence to advising guidelines and other position requirements as described in this Agreement.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation of the Probationer. 1. All evaluation information shall be considered confidential, subject to the Public Records Act.
2. Each tenure review committee shall evaluate only the probationer’s effectiveness in his/her appointment. In addition to the opinion of committee members, the committee can request and consider other professional judgments regarding the probationer’s effectiveness.
3. Each review committee shall consider the following nine standards in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each full-time probationer:
a. The probationer’s instructional skills.
b. The probationer’s relationship with students.
c. The probationer’s relationship with peer faculty.
d. The probationer’s relationship with administration/other staff.
e. The probationer’s knowledge of subject matter.
f. The probationer’s adherence to the institution’s mission, objectives, and policies.
g. The probationer’s action toward professional improvement and development.
h. The probationer’s action toward improvement of course outlines and classroom materials, equipment, supplies, tools and inventory.
i. The probationer’s adherence to advising guidelines and other position requirements as described in this Agreement.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation of the Probationer. 1. All evaluation information shall be considered confidential, subject to the Public Records Act.
2. Each tenure review committee shall evaluate only the probationer’s effectiveness in his/her their appointment. In addition to the opinion of committee members, the committee can request and consider other professional judgments regarding the probationer’s effectivenesseffectiveness in their appointment.
3. Each review committee shall consider the following nine standards in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each full-time probationer:
a. The probationer’s instructional skills.
b. The probationer’s relationship with students.
c. The probationer’s relationship with peer faculty.
d. The probationer’s relationship with administration/other staff.
e. The probationer’s knowledge of subject matter.
f. The probationer’s adherence to the institution’s mission, objectives, and policies.
g. The probationer’s action toward professional improvement and development.
h. The probationer’s action toward improvement of course outlines and classroom materials, equipment, supplies, tools and inventory.
i. The probationer’s adherence to advising guidelines and other position requirements as described in this Agreement.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement