Ex-Post evaluation Sample Clauses

Ex-Post evaluation. The Borrower agrees to cooperate, directly or through the Executing Agency, in the evaluation of the Program to be carried out by the Bank after the Program’s execution, with the purpose of identifying to what extent objectives of the Program have been reached, and to provide to the Bank all the information, data and documentation that the Bank may request to carry out said evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ex-Post evaluation. Ex-post evaluation is to cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of assistance and its impact. It is to cover the factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation of measures and the achievements and results After the completion of measures, the Commission and the beneficiary countries will therefore evaluate the manner, including the efficient and effective use of resources, in which they have been carried out. The evaluation will also cover the actual impact of their implementation in order to assess whether the original objectives have been achieved. This evaluation will, inter alea, address the contribution made by measures to the implementation of Community policies on the environment or its contribution to extended Trans-European networks and common transport policies. They will also assess the environmental impact of the measures. Annex III.2 Provisions governing eligibility of expenditure for measures assisted by ISPA Section I Domain of expenditure The ISPA provides assistance for the following measures:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Ex-Post evaluation. 1. During the last year of validity of the commitment established in the most recent MFA concluded with the [Candidate Country], the on-going evaluation shall take the form of a separate ex-post evaluation. It shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
Sample 1Sample 2
Ex-Post evaluation. (1) At the latest by the end of the first year after the programme implementation period, an ex-post evaluation shall be prepared by Serbia for the IPARD II programme. That report shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
Sample 1
Ex-Post evaluation. An ex-post evaluation shall be carried out by the Republic of Bulgaria in consultation with the Commission under the responsibility of the Managing Authority. On the basis of the evaluation results already available, and taking account of Article 9 of this Section, as well as questions relevant to the Programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex- ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the Programme and results, including their sustainability. The ex-post evaluation shall draw conclusions relevant to the Programme. It shall be completed not later than the end of the fourth year following the conclusion of the final Annual Financing Agreement SECTION C
Sample 1
Ex-Post evaluation. (1) At the latest by the end of the first year after the programme implementation period, an ex-post evaluation shall be prepared by Albania for the IPARD II programme. That report shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
Sample 1
Ex-Post evaluation. (1) At the latest by the end of the first year after the programme implementation period, an ex-post evaluation shall be prepared by [IPA II beneficiary] for the IPARD II programme. That report shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Ex-Post evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.