Ex-Post evaluation. The Borrower agrees to cooperate, directly or through the Executing Agency, in the evaluation of the Program to be carried out by the Bank after the Program’s execution, with the purpose of identifying to what extent objectives of the Program have been reached, and to provide to the Bank all the information, data and documentation that the Bank may request to carry out said evaluation.
Ex-Post evaluation. Ex-post evaluation is to cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of assistance and its impact. It is to cover the factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation of measures and the achievements and results After the completion of measures, the Commission and the beneficiary countries will therefore evaluate the manner, including the efficient and effective use of resources, in which they have been carried out. The evaluation will also cover the actual impact of their implementation in order to assess whether the original objectives have been achieved. This evaluation will, inter alea, address the contribution made by measures to the implementation of Community policies on the environment or its contribution to extended Trans-European networks and common transport policies. They will also assess the environmental impact of the measures. The ISPA provides assistance for the following measures:
(1) Environmental projects enabling the beneficiary countries to comply with the requirements of Community environmental law and with the objectives of the Accession Partnerships;
(2) Transport infrastructure projects which promote sustainable mobility and in particular those that constitute projects of common interest based on the criteria of Decision N° 1692/96/EC2 and those which enable the beneficiary countries to comply with the objectives of the Accession Partnerships; this includes interconnection and interoperability of national networks as well as with the Trans-European Networks together with access to such networks;
(3) Preliminary studies, appraisals, and technical support measures including information and publicity actions related to eligible projects. This includes technical and administrative assistance to the mutual benefit of the Commission and the beneficiary countries which do not fall within the standing remit of the national public administration, covering the identification, preparation, management, monitoring, audit and supervision of projects. The rules specified in sections II to XII below relate to projects listed under items 1 and 2 above they are, however, applied by analogy to decisions for projects listed under item 3.
Ex-Post evaluation. 1. During the last year of validity of the commitment established in the most recent MFA concluded with the [Candidate Country], the on-going evaluation shall take the form of a separate ex-post evaluation. It shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
2. On the basis of the evaluation results already available as well as evaluation questions relevant to the IPARD Programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the IPARD Programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex-ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the IPARD Programme and results, including their sustainability. It shall draw conclusions relevant to the IPARD Programme and to the enlargement process.
3. If the [Candidate Country] fails to submit the ex-post evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 1 the provisions of Article 39(4) shall apply.
Ex-Post evaluation. (1) At the latest by the end of the first year after the programme implementation period, an ex-post evaluation shall be prepared by Serbia for the IPARD III programme. That report shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
(2) On the basis of the evaluation results already available as well as evaluation questions relevant to the IPARD III programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the IPARD III programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex-ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the IPARD III programme and results, including their sustainability. It shall draw conclusions relevant to the IPARD III programme and to the enlargement process.
(3) If Serbia fails to submit the ex-post evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 1, Article 39(5) shall apply.
Ex-Post evaluation. (1) At the latest by the end of the first year after the programme implementation period, an ex-post evaluation shall be prepared by Albania for the IPARD II programme. That report shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
(2) On the basis of the evaluation results already available as well as evaluation questions relevant to the IPARD II programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the IPARD II programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex-ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the IPARD II programme and results, including their sustainability. It shall draw conclusions relevant to the IPARD II programme and to the enlargement process.
(3) If Albania fails to submit the ex-post evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph (1), Article 37(5) shall apply.
Ex-Post evaluation. 1. During the last year of validity of the commitment established in the most recent MFA concluded with Turkey, the on-going evaluation shall take the form of a separate ex-post evaluation. It shall be completed and submitted to the Commission not later than the end of that year.
2. On the basis of the evaluation results already available as well as evaluation questions relevant to the IPARD Programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the IPARD Programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex-ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the IPARD Programme and results, including their sustainability. It shall draw conclusions relevant to the IPARD Programme and to the enlargement process.
3. If Turkey fails to submit the ex-post evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 1 the provisions of Article 39(4) shall apply.
Ex-Post evaluation. An ex-post evaluation shall be carried out by the Republic of Bulgaria in consultation with the Commission under the responsibility of the Managing Authority. On the basis of the evaluation results already available, and taking account of Article 9 of this Section, as well as questions relevant to the Programme, the ex-post evaluation shall cover the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme, its impact and its consistency with the ex- ante evaluation. It shall cover factors contributing to the success or failure of implementation, the achievements of the Programme and results, including their sustainability. The ex-post evaluation shall draw conclusions relevant to the Programme. It shall be completed not later than the end of the fourth year following the conclusion of the final Annual Financing Agreement
Ex-Post evaluation. The Counter-Guarantor agrees to cooperate, directly or through the Executing Agency, in the evaluation of the Program to be carried out by the Bank after the Program’s execution, with the purpose of identifying to what extent the objectives of the Program have been reached, and to provide to the Bank all the information, data, and documentation that the Bank may request to carry out said evaluation.
