Common use of Exceptions to Supplier’s Indemnity Clause in Contracts

Exceptions to Supplier’s Indemnity. Supplier shall have no obligation under Section 14.1 to the extent any claim of infringement is caused by (i) use of the Product in combination with any other products not intended by or provided by Supplier if the infringement would not have occurred but for such combination (except to the extent (a) where the sale or use of the Product would constitute contributory infringement by Supplier; (b) the combination is pursuant to Supplier’s information and instructions applicable to the Product, or (c) there is no commercially reasonable non-infringing use for the Product other than in such combination); (ii) any alteration or modification of the Product not undertaken or authorized by Supplier, if the infringement would not have occurred but for such alteration or modification (the parties agree that incorporation of the Product into a Cisco product shall not be an alteration or modification of the Product); (iii) Supplier’s compliance with Cisco’s unique written specifications if the infringement would not have occurred but for such unique written specifications excepting any implementation thereof by Supplier; or (iv) Cisco’s failure to comply with written instructions provided by Supplier identified by Supplier as necessary to render the Product non-infringing and which would have rendered the Product non-infringing.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Master Purchase Agreement, Master Purchase Agreement (Netlogic Microsystems Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Exceptions to Supplier’s Indemnity. Supplier shall will have no obligation under Section 14.1 12.1(a)(i)or (b) to the extent any claim the alleged infringement arises out of infringement is caused by (i) use or sale of the Product in combination with any other products not intended by provided or provided combinations that may not be reasonably anticipated by Supplier if the infringement would not have occurred but for such combination (except to the extent (a) where the sale or use of the Product would constitute contributory infringement by Supplier; (b) the combination is pursuant to Supplier’s information and instructions applicable to the Product, or (c) there is no commercially reasonable non-infringing use for the Product other than in such combination); (ii) any alteration or modification of the Product not undertaken intended, authorized by Supplier, or authorized subsequently incorporated into the Product by Supplier, if the infringement would not have occurred but for such alteration or modification (the parties agree that incorporation of the Product into a Cisco product shall not be an alteration or modification of the Product)modification; (iii) Supplier’s compliance with Cisco’s unique written specifications if the infringement would not have occurred but for such unique written specifications excepting any implementation thereof by Supplier; or (iv) Cisco’s failure to comply with Supplier’s reasonable written instructions provided by Supplier identified by Supplier as necessary to render the Product non-infringing and which if implemented would have rendered the Product non-infringing, provided that a sufficient time period is given to Cisco to enable it to implement the written instructions and that Supplier remains obligated under Section 12.1 with respect to any infringement occurring up to the end of such time period; (v) the continuing use of any version of the Product after Cisco is provided modifications or replacements that would have avoided or remedied the alleged infringement; or (vi) any intellectual property right in which Cisco or any of its Affiliates has an interest and a right to provide Supplier with a license thereto.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Master Purchase Agreement (Acacia Communications, Inc.), Master Purchase Agreement (Acacia Communications, Inc.)

Exceptions to Supplier’s Indemnity. Supplier shall have no obligation under Section 14.1 18.1 to the extent any claim of infringement is caused by (i) use of the Product in combination with any other products not intended by or provided by Supplier if the infringement would not have occurred but for such combination (except to the extent (a) where the sale or use of the Product would constitute contributory infringement by Supplier; (b) the combination is pursuant to Supplier’s information and instructions applicable to the Product, or (c) there is no commercially reasonable non-infringing use for the Product other than in such combination); (ii) any alteration or modification of the Product not undertaken or authorized by Supplier, if the infringement would not have occurred but for such alteration or modification (the parties agree that incorporation of the Product into a Cisco product shall not be an alteration or modification of the Product); (iii) Supplier’s compliance with Cisco’s unique written specifications if the infringement would not have occurred but for such unique written specifications excepting any implementation thereof by Supplier; or (iv) Cisco’s failure to comply with written instructions provided by Supplier identified by Supplier as necessary to render the Product non-infringing and which would have rendered the Product non-infringing, provided that a reasonable time period is given to Cisco to enable it to implement the written instructions and that Supplier remains obligated under Section 18.1 with respect to any infringement occurring up to the end of such time period.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Master Purchase Agreement (Gsi Technology Inc), Master Purchase Agreement (Gsi Technology Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Exceptions to Supplier’s Indemnity. Supplier shall have no obligation under Section 14.1 18.1 to the extent any claim of infringement is caused by (i) use of the Product in combination with any other products not intended by or provided by Supplier if the infringement would not have occurred but for such combination (except to the extent (a) where the sale or use of the Product would constitute contributory infringement by Supplier; (b) the combination is pursuant to Supplier’s information and instructions applicable to the Product, or (c) there is no commercially reasonable non-infringing use for the Product other than in such combination); (ii) any alteration or modification of the Product not undertaken or authorized by Supplier, if the infringement would not have occurred but for such alteration or modification (the parties agree that incorporation of the Product into a Cisco product shall not be an alteration or modification of the Product); (iii) Supplier’s compliance with Cisco’s unique written specifications if the infringement would not have occurred but for such unique written specifications excepting any implementation thereof by Supplier; or (iv) Cisco’s failure to comply with written instructions provided by Supplier identified by Supplier as necessary to render the Product non-infringing and which would have rendered the Product non-infringing., provided that a reasonable time period is given to Cisco to enable it to implement the written instructions and that Supplier remains obligated under Section 18.1 with respect to any infringement occurring up to the end of such time period. 18.5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Master Purchase Agreement

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.