Common use of FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS Clause in Contracts

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will shall coordinate the federal process EA process, to the extent possible, with BCEAO, the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperationjoint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permit. Annex I shows contains a Xxxxx chart of outlining the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will shall seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA will RAs shall confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA FA, should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that If no triggers for the EA remaintrigger remains, the CEA Agency will shall terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOManitoba, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Manitoba Agreement for on Environmental Assessment CooperationCooperation (2007). Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency Agency, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate seek the federal process with BCEAO, participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the respective federal EA process results in an efficient and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent effective EA that complies with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperationrequirements and regulations of the former CEAA. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV Xxxxxxx XX and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with the BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with the BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV Xxxxxxx XX and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe MDDEP, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Quebec Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Province, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the CanadaDonkin Export Coking Coal Project Federal-British Columbia Agreement for Provincial Environmental Assessment CooperationAgreement. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe MDDEP, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Quebec Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Assessment; Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe MDDEP, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Quebec Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Assessment; Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe MDDEP, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Quebec Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV Xxxxxxx XX and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of the Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOManitoba, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Manitoba Agreement for on Environmental Assessment CooperationCooperation (2007). Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with the BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate seek the federal process with BCEAO, participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the respective federal EA process results in an efficient and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent effective EA that complies with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperationrequirements and regulations of the former CEAA. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Province, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the CanadaDonkin Export Coking Coal Project Federal-British Columbia Agreement for Provincial Environmental Assessment CooperationAgreement. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of the Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will shall coordinate the federal process EA process, to the extent possible, with BCEAO, the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperationjoint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permit. Annex I shows contains a Xxxxx chart of outlining the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will shall seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA will RAs shall confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA FA, should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that If no triggers for the EA remaintrigger remains, the CEA Agency will shall terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAOthe Ontario Ministry of Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Ontario Agreement for on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes Annex IV and V show shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency Agency, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Project Agreement

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.