Common use of FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS Clause in Contracts

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency shall coordinate the federal EA process, to the extent possible, with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA to ensure that joint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permit. Annex I contains a Xxxxx chart outlining the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency shall seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs shall confirm any regulatory or other decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA, should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If no EA trigger remains, the CEA Agency shall terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency shall will coordinate the federal EA processreview with provincial processes, to the extent possible, with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be undertaken whenever circumstances permitdone. Annex I contains shows a Xxxxx chart outlining of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency shall seek will work together with the participation of RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulationsformer CEAA. The type of EA required is a screening. During the EA process, RAs shall will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EISEA report, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not requireddecision, it will end it’s participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from the CEA Agency an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA, FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If In the event that no triggers for the EA trigger remainsremain, the CEA Agency shall RAs will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency shall has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal EA process, to the extent possible, process with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 Ontario Ministry of the JBNQA Environment, to ensure that joint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permitthe respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I contains shows a Xxxxx chart outlining of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency shall will seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs shall will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency Agency, continue to participate as an expert FA, FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If In the event that no triggers for the EA trigger remainsremain, the CEA Agency shall will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject In addition, and under the discretionary powers afforded to a federal environmental assessment studyRAs in s.15 of the CEAA, the proposed scope of the Project as described by the Proponent was enlarged to include wharf upgrades at PAPA and the operation of vessels associated with the Project within Alberni Inlet and Xxxxxxx Sound to the Cape Xxxxx Pilot Station. The CEA Agency shall has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal EA process, to the extent possible, process with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA BC EAO, to ensure that joint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permitthe respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I contains shows a Xxxxx chart outlining of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. Annex V shows the milestones and service standards for TC as an FA with a regulatory responsibility to the project. The CEA Agency shall will seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs shall will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA, FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If In the event that no triggers for the EA trigger remainsremain, the CEA Agency shall will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment study. The CEA Agency shall has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal EA process, to the extent possible, process with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA NL - ENVC to ensure that joint steps be undertaken whenever circumstances permitthe respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a coordinated manner. Annex I contains shows a Xxxxx chart outlining of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency shall will seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs shall will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA, FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If In the event that no triggers for the EA trigger remainsremain, the CEA Agency shall will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The project is subject to a federal environmental assessment studyManitoba Hydro. The CEA Agency shall and the Manitoba Conservation will coordinate the federal and provincial EA processreview processes, to the extent possible, with the provincial environmental review under Chapter 22 of the JBNQA to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be undertaken whenever circumstances permitdone pursuant to the Canada-Manitoba Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I contains shows a Xxxxx chart outlining of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as for Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the EA and for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency shall seek will work together with the participation of RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulationsCEAA. The type of EA required is a screening. During the EA process, RAs shall will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not requireddecision, it will end its participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from the CEA Agency an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA, FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. If no EA trigger remains, the CEA Agency shall terminate the EA.