Common use of FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS Clause in Contracts

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency will coordinate the federal EA review with provincial processes, to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be done. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will work together with the RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA. The type of EA required is a screening. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EA report, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decision, it will end it’s participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the RAs will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. In addition, and under the discretionary powers afforded to RAs in s.15 of the CEAA, the proposed scope of the Project as described by the Proponent was enlarged to include wharf upgrades at PAPA and the operation of vessels associated with the Project within Alberni Inlet and Xxxxxxx Sound to the Cape Xxxxx Pilot Station. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal EA review process with provincial processesthe BC EAO, to ensure that joint steps the respective federal and provincial requirements are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be donemet in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. Annex V shows the milestones and service standards for TC as an FA with a regulatory responsibility to the project. The CEA Agency will work together with seek the participation of RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA. The type of EA required is a screeningCEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EA reportEIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decisiondecision or other trigger decision is not required, it will end it’s participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the RAs CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal EA review process with provincial processes, the NL - ENVC to ensure that joint steps the respective federal and provincial requirements are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be donemet in a coordinated manner. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will work together with seek the participation of RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA. The type of EA required is a screeningCEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EA reportEIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decisiondecision or other trigger decision is not required, it will end it’s participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the RAs CEA Agency will terminate the EA.

FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project described in the Project Description as provided by the ProponentManitoba Hydro. The CEA Agency and the Manitoba Conservation will coordinate the federal and provincial EA review with provincial processes, to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be donedone pursuant to the Canada-Manitoba Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annex IV Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will work together with the RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA. The type of EA required is a screening. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may is not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EA reportEIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decision, it will end it’s its participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the RAs will terminate the EA.