Force factor Sample Clauses

Force factor. Since the frequency-weighted ®lter does not account for force, ®ltered angular outputs must be adjusted by a force factor in order to comply with the discomfort model. The adjustment (dB) for a given exertion E was determined by: aE 5 AE F 2 A¢F where aE is the adjustment (dB) for exertion E (Newtons), AE,F is the angular attenuation level (dB) for exertion E and frequency F (Hz) based on the discomfort model for a given discomfort level and wrist flexion angle as a reference, and A¢F is the angular attenuation level (dB) for frequency F of the frequency-weighted ®lter (table 6). The 758 wrist flexion was used as a reference in order to cover the female range of wrist motion (NASA 1978). The diSerence between AE,F and A¢F can be determined by: aE 5 AE F 2 A¢ 5 20 3 log XFE F X¢F where XFE was the angle from the discomfort model for frequency F and exertion E, and X¢F was the ®lter angle without accounting for force. Since the discomfort model is linear and the ®lter attenuation slope is a constant, the necessary adjustment (dB) for a given exertion is constant and independent of frequency. The linear equation between a given exertion level and its force adjustments for discomfort level 10 was: aE 5 34 .88 log E 258 .67 The adjustment aE was derived by solving a linear equation between the points (logE1, aE1) and (logE2, aE2), where aE1 (dB) was the force adjustment for E1 (N) and aE2 (dB) was the force adjustment for E2 (N). The force factor for a given exertion level was determined by converting the force adjustment (dB) into a ratio: Substituting, fE 5 XFE X¢F and solving, aE 5 20 3log ( fE ) aE fE 5 10 20 Therefore the force factor fE for exertion level E was equal to:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Force factor

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will:

  • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS The Contractor will perform any or all Tasks in the Construction Task Catalog for the Unit Price appearing therein multiplied by the following Adjustment Factors. See the General Terms and Conditions for additional information.

  • Non pre-priced Adjustment Factor To be applied to Work determined not to be included in the CTC but within the general scope of the work: 1.2750.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.