Common use of Functionality Criteria Clause in Contracts

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Very good Points allocated for turn- 10 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- Good around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( (SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points cash flow Poor submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Excellent Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer Bider. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 28 Good 9 21 Satisfactory 14 Poor 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 20 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tendererBider/bidder in consideration 10 20 Good 9 18 Satisfactory 7 14 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 8 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good 25 Excellent Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 25 Good 20 Fair 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 10 Very poor 5 BID 8 T1.1 Part T1: Bidding procedures Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( (SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Very good Points allocated for the 10 Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the Good availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 15 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer tenderer. 35 15 Good 31.5 12.5 Satisfactory 24.5 10 Poor 14 5 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Client References 20 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 5 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 15 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 15 Good 12.5 Satisfactory 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 5 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 3 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Current Commitments 10 Very good Points allocated for previous client references specifying Current Commitments 10 Good 7,5 Satisfactory 5 Poor 3 Unacceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 13,5 9 Satisfactory 10,5 7 Poor 6 Unacceptable 4 Not acceptable 0 Notes: