GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing CHOs are those that offer a service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable. 2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website. 2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013. 2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website. 2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee. 2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges. 2.7 The Technical Committee operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements are: a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes). b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions: (1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming to light in respect of a GTA claim; (2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute being formally raised in writing with the relevant subscriber, a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred; (3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.15; and (4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first being raised by a subscriber in relation to the relevant claim(s). c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint. d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee. e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider. f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply: (i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same. (ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee. (iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers. (iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply. g) Any decisions taken by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open to challenge by non-binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the independent adjudicator has reached his/her determination. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay to the adjudicator the advance paid by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). i) Any conclusion reached by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanism. j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.145. k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8. 2.8 Changes will only be made to the terms of the GTA (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI website) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis. a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply: (i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same. (ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives. (iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers. (iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply. (v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request. (vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraph
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: General Terms of Agreement, General Terms of Agreement, General Terms of Agreement
GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing First tier CHOs are those that offer a nationwide service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable.
2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing first tier CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing First tier CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website.
2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013The GTA website includes the names and contact details for second tier CHOs, who have agreed terms with one or more individual subscribing insurers for the settlement of disputes in accordance with the principles of the GTA and the GTA settlement rates. The relevant second tier CHO’s settlement rates will not exceed those of first tier CHOs under the GTA.
2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website.
2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee.
2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges.
2.7 The Technical Committee operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements are:
a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes).
b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions:
(1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming to light in respect of a GTA claim;
(2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute being formally raised in writing with the relevant subscriber, a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred;
(3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.156.14; and
(4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first being raised by a subscriber in relation to the relevant claim(s).
c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint.
d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee.
e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider.
f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
g) Any decisions taken by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open to challenge by non-binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the independent adjudicator has reached his/her determination. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay to the adjudicator the advance paid by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
i) Any conclusion reached by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanism.
j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate6.14. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 6.14 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.1456.14.
k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8.
2.8 Changes will only be made to the terms of the GTA (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI website) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis.
a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
(v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request.
(vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraph
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: General Terms of Agreement, General Terms of Agreement
GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing CHOs are those that offer a service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable.
2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website.
2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013.
2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website.
2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee.
2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges.
2.7 The Technical Committee operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements are:
a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes).
b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions:
(1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming to light in respect of a GTA claim;
(2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute being formally raised in writing with the relevant subscriber, a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred;
(3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.156.14; and
(4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first being raised by a subscriber in relation to the relevant claim(s).
c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint.
d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee.
e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider.
f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
g) Any decisions taken by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open to challenge by non-binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the independent adjudicator has reached his/her determination. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay to the adjudicator the advance paid by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
i) Any conclusion reached by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanism.
j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.145.
k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8.
2.8 Changes will only be made to the terms of the GTA (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI website) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis.
a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
(v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request.
(vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraphaccordance
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: General Terms of Agreement
GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing First tier CHOs are those that offer a nationwide service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable.
2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing first tier CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing First tier CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website.
2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013The GTA website includes the names and contact details for second tier CHOs, who have agreed terms with one or more individual subscribing insurers for the settlement of disputes in accordance with the principles of the GTA and the GTA settlement rates. The relevant second tier CHO’s settlement rates will not exceed those of first tier CHOs under the GTA.
2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website.
2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee.
2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges.
2.7 The Technical Committee operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements [A process map is available to summarise the arrangements] are:
a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol this paragraph 2.7 and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out in this paragraph 2.7 (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes).
b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions:
(1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming to light in respect of a GTA claim);
(2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute a Payment Pack being formally raised issued in writing with relation to the relevant subscriberclaim(s), and/or where the final dispute resolution contacts have been unable to reach a resolution within 30 days of a Payment Pack being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s), a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred;
(3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.156.14; and
(4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first of a Payment Pack being raised by a subscriber issued in relation to the relevant claim(s).
c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint.
d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee.
e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider.
f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
g) Any decisions taken by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open to challenge by non-non- binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-non- binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the independent adjudicator has reached his/her determination. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay to the adjudicator the advance paid by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
i) Any conclusion reached by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanism.
j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate6.14. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 6.14 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.1456.14.
k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8.
2.8 Changes will only be made to the terms of the GTA (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI website) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis.
a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
(v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request.
(vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraph
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: General Terms of Agreement
GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing First tier CHOs are those that are able to offer a nationwide service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable.
2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing first tier CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing First tier CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website.
2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013The GTA website includes the names and contact details for second tier CHOs, who have agreed terms with one or more individual subscribing insurers for the settlement of disputes in accordance with the principles of the GTA and the GTA settlement rates. The relevant second tier CHO’s settlement rates will not exceed those of first tier CHOs under the GTA.
2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website.
2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA a Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee.
2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes on issues of principle or interpretation of wordings in the GTA. Details are on the GTA website and can be obtained from the Secretary to the Technical Committee.
2.7 Changes will only be made to the GTA after full consultation with insurer and CHO subscribers. Changes will be considered first by the Technical Committee. Comments from all subscribers will be invited on any significant changes to the GTA and will only be introduced if they command general support and are endorsed by the Technical Committee.
2.8 The Technical Committee will oversee an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges.
2.7 The Technical Committee operates charges and agree a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements are:
a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes).
b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions:
(1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued position in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming any proposed changes. Any changes to light CHOs individual settlement rates that are in respect of a GTA claim;
(2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute being formally raised in writing line with the relevant subscriber, a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred;
(3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.15; and
(4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first being raised by a subscriber in relation to the relevant claim(s).
c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint.
d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee.
e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider.
f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
g) Any decisions taken position agreed by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open will take effect on 1 July on application by the CHO for amended settlement rates to challenge by non-binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of be included on the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. ABI GTA website.
2.9 The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the operate on a consensus basis with any disagreements being resolved, if necessary, by independent adjudicator has reached his/her determinationmediation. If mediation fails and significant opposition remains, it will not be introduced. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay take appropriate account of all applicable legislation, including competition law, and regulations and will take legal advice where it considers it appropriate.
2.10 The Technical Committee will have the right to arrange periodic CHO audits of adherence to the adjudicator the advance paid GTA by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
i) Any conclusion reached an appropriate person nominated by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator provided that such right of audit will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute extend to matters concerning hire and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanismrepair.
j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified 2.11 Applications from insurers and CHOs to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.145.
k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change subscribe to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8.
2.8 Changes will only should be made addressed to the terms of the GTA ABI by email (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI websiteXX.Xxxx@xxx.xxx.xx) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges by fax (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis0000 000 0000).
a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
(v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request.
(vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraph
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: General Terms of Agreement
GTA ADMINISTRATION ARRANGEMENTS. 2.1 Subscribing CHOs are those that offer a service from a range of vehicles, a hire vehicle to customers for delivery to the customer within four working hours under normal circumstances (exceptional circumstances could include non-standard vehicles or remote locations). They will have been vetted by an appropriate person(s) nominated by the Technical Committee and their documentation, scripts and work processes will have been deemed to be acceptable.
2.2 Subscribing insurers and subscribing CHOs are listed on the ABI’s website xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/tphire (“the ABI website”). Subscribing CHOs settlement rates are also listed on the ABI website.
2.3 Paragraph relating to 2nd Tier status deleted 1.1.2013.
2.4 All subscribers are required to have an up to date nominated contact(s) who will act as the final dispute resolution point for the subscriber. Their names and contact details are listed on the ABI GTA website.
2.5 Responsibility for the operation and wording of the GTA will be through the GTA Technical Committee. This will comprise an equal number of representatives of subscribing insurers and CHOs, nominated from the ABI Focus Group of insurers and CHO trade associations, plus an independent Chairman and Secretary, agreed by the Technical Committee. The Secretary shall not have any vote in the Technical Committee.
2.6 The purpose of the Technical Committee is to oversee the smooth running of the GTA including issues arising from its wording, operation, dispute resolution and adherence to its terms and the spirit of the agreement. It also undertakes an annual review of the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fee and any other additional charges.
2.7 The Technical Committee operates a dispute resolution facility to settle disputes arising between individual subscribers on issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. These arrangements are:
a) All subscribers to the GTA are required to abide by the dispute resolution procedures described in the protocol and all disputes between individual subscribers concerning claims made under the GTA must be resolved in accordance with the mechanism set out (unless the two subscribers at issue have agreed alternative bilateral arrangements for the resolution of their disputes).
b) This disputes mechanism will only be used in respect of any dispute which meets the following cumulative conditions:
(1) the dispute has been notified to the other subscriber involved within 30 days of a Payment Pack (as referred to in paragraph 6) being issued in relation to the relevant claim(s) or for a CHO within 30 days of the issue coming to light in respect of a GTA claim;
(2) deadlock has been reached and confirmed between the final dispute resolution contacts for the respective businesses as set out on the ABI website. In relation to any dispute where the dispute is not escalated by either subscriber to its final dispute resolution contacts within 30 days of the dispute being formally raised in writing with the relevant subscriber, a deadlock will be deemed to have occurred;
(3) in the opinion of either party to the dispute, the dispute raises issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Where the parties to the dispute agree that the dispute does not concern any issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA, the dispute shall be resolved by commercial settlement between those parties outside of this dispute mechanism, failing which the CHO may elect to invoke paragraph 6.14,6.15; and
(4) the dispute has been referred to the Technical Committee under sub-paragraph c) below within a strict time limit of 60 days from the dispute first being raised by a subscriber in relation to the relevant claim(s).
c) Formal complaints should be sent to the Independent Secretary, Joint Technical Committee (Email: xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) with supporting documentation and confirmation of the deadlock. The Secretary will check the complaint, ensure it is relevant to the GTA and refine it as necessary. The Secretary will check that the relevant complaint is not out of time and will indicate to the complainant if he/she considers that the complaint does not raise issues of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA. Such indication about the nature of the complaint will not be binding on the complainant who, having taking into account the views of the Secretary, may decide to proceed with the referral of the complaint.
d) The Secretary will agree a final version with the complainant and then send it to the subscriber being complained about with a x request for a detailed, rational response in writing within 30 days. The Secretary will use his/her best endeavours to resolve the complaint with advice or views to either party within that 30 day period. Either that will resolve the complaint or it will be clear there is no agreement between the two parties. They will be informed if this is the case and told it will then be sent to the Technical Committee for consideration. In the absence of information or a response from the subscriber to which a complaint is being made within that 30 day period, the complaining subscriber’s complaint will still be considered by the Technical Committee.
e) If a complaint is sent to the Technical Committee, the complaint and any response will be sent to the insurer and CHO representatives on the Technical Committee for views with the subscriber names omitted. Technical Committee members will be asked to use their best endeavours to give their comments (including as to whether the complaint raises an issue of principle or interpretation of operation or wording of the GTA) within a set period, usually 30 days. If there is no clear view the complaint will go to the next meeting of the Technical Committee to consider.
f) If the Technical Committee unanimously reaches a conclusion, then both subscribers will be informed of the decision and, if appropriate, the decision reached will be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted). If the Technical Committee is not able to reach a unanimous view, then the Chairman will be required to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be communicated to both subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives at the Technical Committee.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his decision in writing to the parties to the dispute, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his decision. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
g) Any decisions taken by the Technical Committee or Chairman are open to challenge by non-binding determination which shall proceed if at least one of the relevant subscribers requests such a determination, in which case the relevant subscribers will be required to pay the advance detailed below. Within 30 days of a subscriber notifying the Secretary of the Technical Committee of its request for a determination, the Technical Committee shall appoint an independent adjudicator from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. The subscribers will be required to lodge with the Secretary of the Technical Committee the full amount of the independent adjudicator’s costs before the non-binding determination proceeds. The Secretary of the Technical Committee will hold such advances until the independent adjudicator has reached his/her determination. The successful party will have their advance repaid and the Secretary of the Technical Committee will pay to the adjudicator the advance paid by the ‘losing’ subscriber. The decision of the independent adjudicator will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
h) If one subscriber fails to agree to or to lodge the advance required for the non-binding determination then, in the absence of insurer / CHO associations agreeing to act or to fund the advance for them, and provided that the other subscriber has lodged the advance required, there will be a presumption that the other subscriber is correct without the need for the non-binding determination to take place. In such event, the advance lodged by the other subscriber will immediately be repaid. This will then be publicised to subscribers for information (with the subscriber names omitted).
i) Any conclusion reached by the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator will apply, albeit in a non-binding manner, as between only those subscribers that have referred the dispute and in respect only of that particular dispute as referred. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any such conclusion will not apply to any similar claims, whether past or present, between those same subscribers or to any similar claims, whether past or present, between any other subscribers, all of which would need to be separately referred to the Technical Committee under this dispute resolution mechanism.
j) If the insurer prevails in the dispute before the Technical Committee, Chairman or independent adjudicator, the relevant claim(s) will be treated for the purposes of paragraph 6 as being as old as at the date the complaint was notified to the Secretary of the Technical Committee under paragraph 2.7(c), so that the insurer can still fully settle the claim(s) in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims) without incurring any late payment charges. If the CHO prevails and the claim(s) and any late payment charges is (are) not paid in full in accordance with the GTA (as clarified in relation to those claims), the CHO may choose to pursue the claim(s) outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14 or 6.15 as appropriate. Subscribers acknowledge that, in either case, the GTA terms and conditions, including the dispute resolution arrangements, are accepted by subscribers as having no relevance in law in relation to any claim(s) that are taken outside the scope of the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.15 and cannot be cited in any legal proceedings. Nothing in the dispute resolution arrangements will limit or restrict the right of a CHO to remove a claim from the GTA in accordance with paragraph 6.14/6.145.
k) Whether the complaint is resolved by the Technical Committee, Chairman or by an independent adjudicator and whether or not it is pursued by the relevant subscribers outside the scope of the GTA, if the Technical Committee considers that a “FAQ” (as published on the ABI website) or other change to the GTA is required to clarify the issue that was in dispute between the relevant subscribers for the future, they may take appropriate steps to issue a FAQ and/or amend the GTA as described in paragraph 2.8.
2.8 Changes will only be made to the terms of the GTA (including the “FAQs” published on the ABI website) or the range of daily settlement rates, late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) following discussions in the Technical Committee and, where required under this paragraph 2.8 or agreed desirable by the Technical Committee, comments invited from all subscribers on any significant changes. Subscribers may agree separate arrangements in relation to the acceptance of all such changes on a bilateral basis.
a) Changes to the terms of the GTA or late payment penalties, administration fees or any other additional charges (including any charges that are to be expressly stipulated as non-payable) will be introduced if they are unanimously endorsed by the Technical Committee. Where the Technical Committee is not unanimous, the Chairman will use his/her best endeavours to seek an agreed view, taking into account the views of all parties and, if necessary, mediate back and forth between the parties to assist in reaching an agreed resolution. If unanimity proves impossible, the Chairman will be empowered to make a decision on behalf of the Technical Committee that will be binding on the Technical Committee and all subscribers. If the Chairman is required to make a binding decision in this manner, the following additional provisions shall apply:
(i) Subject to the following provisions, the Chairman will in his absolute discretion decide the procedure to be adopted to determine the matter and the timetable for the same.
(ii) The Chairman will be required to take into account the debates of the Technical Committee and any submissions made by insurer and/or CHO representatives.
(iii) The Chairman will have the power to conduct such surveys, tests and/or investigations as he reasonably believes appropriate or to request further information or submissions from the Technical Committee or subscribers.
(iv) The Chairman will make his determination in writing to the parties, setting out what he has considered and taken into account in reaching his conclusion. He will not be required, however, to give reasons for his determination. In so doing, the Chairman will not be acting as arbitrator and the provisions of the Arbitration Xxx 0000 (or any subsequent modification or replacement of that Act) will not apply.
(v) The Chairman may on his own initiative or at the written request of either party, correct any clerical mistake, error or ambiguity within his determination. Any corrections will be made within 3 days of any such request.
(vi) The Chairman will receive no additional or special remuneration for making this decision, and any costs incurred by the subscribers and their representatives on the Technical Committee shall be borne by them. Any costs incurred by any third parties required to participate pursuant to sub-paragraph
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: General Terms of Agreement
