Ideal Scheduler Clause Samples

Ideal Scheduler. The goal of an ideal scheduler would be to serve as many UEs as possible for a given set of spatial degree of freedom, with the highest possible throughput. This means being able to use a high-rate modulation and coding scheme (MCS), without too high packet error rate. In case of LTE Advanced, the highest modulation scheme is 64QAM. For evaluation of some main scheduling effects, we will below use a 4x2 MIMO system, i.e. each cell has 4 Tx- and each UE 2 Rx-antennas. Otherwise the simulation parameters are as in Table 5.1. Optimization of CoMP scheduling represents – similar as for MU-MIMO scheduling - a multi dimensional non-convex optimization problem. The goal is, in general, to maximize the spectral efficiency while keeping a predefined degree of fairness or, even better, to improve the degree of fairness as this is one of the main ARTIST4G goals. This is equivalent to maximizing the sum rate over all NDS simultaneously served data streams per CA, constrained by the intended degree of fairness. For JP CoMP, the following aspects have to be taken into account: - Setup of cooperation areas that allow a high penetration rate of user-centric served UEs - User grouping that provides a high mutual orthogonality for users who share each subcarrier or physical resource block PRBi. This means, in particular, that different users should have their strongenst channels to different transmit antennas or beams. - Allocation of numbers of streams per UE, per cell and in the end per CA. This is a trade- off because when increasing the number of streams per cooperation area, NDS, the goodput (GP) per stream will typically decrease. (Note that GP counts the throughput of correctly received retransmission blocks and therefore represents the throughput excluding the overhead for hybrid ARQ retransmissions.) - For each potential user group, the optimum cooperation-area wide precoder matrix W and UE individual beamformers or filters Fk ∈ CNUE x 1 – including phase and power - have to be derived, which in general is a non convex optimization problem by itself. - Scheduling of UE sets to PRBs or subcarriers, to maximize overall capacity by exploiting multi- user scheduling gains, while ensuring at least proportional fairness for all UEs. Taking all these scheduling dimensions into account, one can formulate the overall optimization problem for maximum spectral efficiency SEmax as follows: SE = arg(max( ∑∑GP(CAopt,UEopt ,Wopt,Fopt , PRB ) / N ) (5.2.1) nDS NPRB b 1..K
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Ideal Scheduler

  • Submittal Schedule Within sixty days after the Effective Date of the Contract, the Contractor shall prepare and submit a Submittal Schedule for review and approval of the Design Professional. In establishing the Submittal Schedule the Contractor shall take into account large submittal documents that will require longer review times, e.g., submittals with over fifty sheets of drawings. The Design Professional’s approval shall be based on conformance of the Submittal Schedule with the Overall Project Schedule, subject to change from time to time in accordance with the progress of the Work.

  • Supplemental Schedules To Agent, supplemental disclosures, if any, required by Section 5.6.

  • DELIVERY SCHEDULES In accordance with the "Non-State Agencies Participation in Centralized Contracts” and “Extension of Use” clauses herein, this Contract is extended to local governments, political subdivisions and others authorized by law as well as State agencies. The Delivery Schedules (based on Requirement Letter RL182) are available as a guide to indicate proposed delivery points and estimated annual requirements. Delivery Schedules may be revised or clarified as necessary. Any specific questions regarding the site conditions should be directed to the end-user at the telephone number shown on the Delivery Schedule. The Delivery Schedules are available upon request. Contractors shall be obligated to deliver under the Contract to any State agency which places a purchase order under the Contract, whether or not such delivery location is identified in the Delivery Schedules. Any political subdivision or other non-State entity which has not filed a requirement with OGS as of the date of the bid opening shall be eligible to receive deliveries at Contractor's option only, upon placement of a valid purchase order to the Contractor's address as indicated in the award. Contracts created by OGS in response to receipt of Filed Requirements are considered to be binding. At Contractor's request, Contractor will be advised in writing regarding political subdivisions or other Non-State entities which have filed on a timely basis but do not appear on the Delivery Schedule. Where “Standby” is indicated in the Delivery Schedule, this reflects those facilities which normally use a fuel supply (i.e. natural gas) other than fuel oil and will only use fuel oil when alternate fuel is unavailable.

  • Schedule Updates the Contractor agrees to maintain the Work duration schedule updates on an ongoing basis and, when the County requests it, include the updates in its payment request. The Contractor may be required to submit a narrative report with each monthly update which shall include a description of current and anticipated problem areas, delaying factors and their impact, and an explanation of corrective action taken or proposed. Failure to do so may be considered a material breach of the Contract. Any additional or unanticipated costs or expense required to maintain the schedules shall be solely the Contractor’s obligation and Contractor agrees not to charge the County.

  • Delivery Schedule The Goods specified in the List of Goods are required to be delivered within the acceptable time range (after the earliest and before the final date, both dates inclusive) specified in Section V, Schedule of Requirements. No credit will be given to deliveries before the earliest date, and Tenders offering delivery after the final date shall be treated as non-responsive. Within this acceptable period, an adjustment of [insert the adjustment factor], will be added, for evaluation purposes only, to the Tender price of Tenders offering deliveries later than the “Earliest Delivery Date” specified in Section V, Schedule of Requirements.