Conclusions. There is no basis for finding that the agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Conclusions. Based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), applicable Treasury Department regulations in effect as of the date hereof, current published administrative positions of the Internal Revenue Service contained in revenue rulings and procedures, and judicial decisions, and upon the assumptions and representations referred to herein and the documents provided to us by you (including the Proxy Statement and the Reorganization Agreement), it is our opinion for Federal income tax purposes that:
Conclusions. Stanxxx xxxcluded that, based upon and subject to its analysis, assumptions, limitations and qualifications cited in its opinion, and as of the date of the fairness opinion, the merger value to be paid in cash for the limited partner interests in connection with the mergers is fair from a financial point of view to the limited partner of each respective partnership. Compensation and Material Relationships. Stanxxx xxx been paid a fee of $200,000 in connection with the rendering of the fairness opinion. Such fee was not conditioned on Stanxxx'x xxxdings and is payable whether or not the mergers are consummated. In addition, Stanxxx xxxl be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including legal fees, and will be indemnified against certain liabilities including certain liabilities under the securities laws. During the past two years, the partnerships had engaged Stanxxx xx render financial advisory services in connection with proposed transactions which were withdrawn and never consummated. In connection with such assignments Stanxxx xxx paid fees aggregating $125,000. ALTERNATIVE TRANSACTIONS TO THE MERGERS We considered the following alternative types of transactions before selecting the merger transaction described in this document. As discussed below, we believe that the mergers are the best available alternative for the partnerships to maximize the value of the partnerships' property interests.
Conclusions. There is no basis for finding that the amendment to the previously approved agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Conclusions. Following the instructions above and providing accurate and readable text, tables, figures, and citations will help to make your report useful to readers. Scientists may read your report, as well as water planners, utility providers, and interested citizens. If your report successfully conveys accurate scientific information and explanations to these readers, we can help to create more informed decisions about the use, development, and management of water in the state.
Conclusions. The IN NRAs have consulted and closely cooperated and coordinated to reach agreement that they request an amendment to the IN cost sharing submitted by IN TSOs pursuant to Article 74 of CACM. The amended proposal should take into account the IN NRAs position stated above, and should be submitted by TSOs no later than 2 months after the last national decision to request an amendment has been made, in accordance with Article 9(12) of CACM.
Conclusions. If the College concludes that the charge of harassment is meritorious, it will provide timely notification to the accused of any corrective action proposed by the College.
Conclusions. In conclusion, we have developed a green version of organo- phosphorus-catalysed amide bond formation between unacti- vated aromatic carboxylic acids and amines. The commercially available pre-catalyst 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-phospholene oxide 4 is reduced in situ by inexpensive and environmentally benign poly(methylhydrosiloxane) and bis( p-nitrophenyl) phosphate. With our newly developed method a wide variety of secondary and tertiary amides could be synthesised in very good to excel- lent yields. It is envisioned that organophosphorus catalysis will be a subject of extensive investigations in the upcoming years. Moreover, we believe that poly(methylhydrosiloxane) will find practical applications in several other common reactions in organic chemistry. Experimental A Radleys tube equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with carboxylic acid (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), phosphine oxide 4 (0.075 mmol or 0.125 mmol; 0.15 or 0.25 equiv.), and Published on 17 July 2017. Downloaded by Radboud University Nijmegen on 3/8/2019 8:23:31 AM. bis( p-nitrophenyl) phosphate (0.025 mmol, 0.05 equiv.). Subsequently toluene (2.5 mL, 0.2 M) was added, and to the formed suspension were added benzylamine (0.65 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), CCl4 (1.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), and poly(methyl- hydrosiloxane) (Mw 2450 Da, 0.12 mmol, 9 Si–H equiv.). The reaction was stirred at 110 °C for 20 hours. After cooling to room temperature, toluene was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was resuspended in ethyl acetate (20 mL). The organic phase was washed with sat. aqueous NaHCO3 (2 × 20 mL), brine (1 × 20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The crude product was puri- fied by silica column chromatography (ethyl acetate and n-heptane) to afford the desired amide. Conflict of interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Acknowledgements We thank Dr Xxxx Xxxxx for technical assistance with in situ VT 1H NMR and 31P NMR experiments. Notes and references 1 (a) X. X. xxx Xxxxxxxx, X. X. xxx Xxxxx and F. P. J. T. Rutjes, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 1615–1624; (b) X. Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxx, Tetrahedron Lett., 2016, 57, 4443–4451. 2 (a) X. X. Xxxxxxx, X. X. XxXxxxxxx and X. XxXxxxxx-Xxxxx, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2589–2591; (b) X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxx, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 7340–7343; (c) X. Xx, X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxx and X. X. Xxxxxx, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 8769– 8776; (d) X. X. Xxxxxx, X. Xx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxx and A. M. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxx....
Conclusions. The Regulatory Authorities have consulted and closely cooperated and coordinated to reach the agreement that they approve the RR exchange & sharing proposals submitted by Continental Europe TSOs pursuant to Article 178(1) and Article 179(1) of SO GL. The Regulatory Authorities must take their national decisions, on the basis of this agreement, by 2 April 2019.
Conclusions. All six POCT urine analysers in our study have good xxx- lytical performance for diagnosing UTI (nitrite, leuco- cytes and erythrocytes). All but one POCT urine analyser showed perfect agreement with the laboratory standard concerning nitrite test results. Concerning leucocytes and erythrocytes most POCT urine analysers showed high specificity, but sensitivity was lower. User-friendliness was judged as good for all analysers. Acknowledgements The authors thank all participating GPs and GP assistants who collected the urine samples for our study. They thank Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxx xxx Xxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx from Saltro Diagnostic Centre for the analysis of the urine samples with the laboratory reference standards. Contributors MJCS contributed to data collection, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. SvD and RMH contributed to study design, data collection, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. XXXX contributed to data analysis and writing of the manuscript. NJdW contributed to critical revision of the manuscript and provided study support. Funding This study was equally funded by the five manufacturers of the six automatic urine strip POCT analysers and by Saltro Diagnostic Centre. Each manufacturer funded 1/6 of the total sum; Saltro Diagnostic Centre funded the remaining 1/6 share. Competing interests None declared. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Data sharing statement Additional data can be accessed via the Dryad data repository at xxxx://xxxxxxxxx.xxx/ with the doi:10.5061/dryad.kv3q7. Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx/xx-xx/0.0/ REFERENCES
