Illustrating scenario Sample Clauses

Illustrating scenario. ‌ To illustrate the IRM method, extended with the above-described concepts, we elaborate on a scenario from the Science Cloud Case Study, which itself is an extension of the base scenario already described in [BGeH+12]. In this scenario, several heterogeneous network nodes, forming an open-ended cloud platform, run a third-party service, such us a user’s program which involves computational-intensive scientific calculations. This way, the client running e.g., on a smartphone, can take advantage of the nearby available computational power (laptops, tablets, servers, etc.) by offloading parts of the application into other nodes that handle the back-end application logic. These nodes can be part of a traditional cloud infrastructure, if available, and thus leased on demand while the system is running and its demand for resources grows. The general assumptions are that a) the application’s back-end can be partitioned into several nodes (allows ”scaling out”) and b) the mechanism of effectively migrating application parts across different nodes exists. Given the above scenario, the goal of the system under development is twofold: i) guarantee an upper limit in the rendering delay observed by the user, ii) distribute the off-loaded computation according to the capacity and current load of every contributing node. Figure 3 shows a possible IRM graph for the above scenario. The design starts with the identified top-level invariant stating that ”Load is balanced while expected QoS is kept”. The ”expected QoS” has been quantified by the SPL formula that specifies an upper bound on the application’s response time (500 ms). This invariant can be decomposed into two possible sub-invariants, based on the situation the system resides in and specifically based on whether extra computational power from a cloud data center is needed. In the first case (Cloud not needed situation) invariant (2) is decomposed into one assumption
View Source

Related to Illustrating scenario

  • Illustration If DTH OPERATOR has opted for Zee TV on A-▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ Basis and the Monthly Average Active Subscriber Level for a particular month reported by the DTH OPERATOR is 10,000 subscribers for Zee TV, then the Subscription Fee payable by the DTH OPERATOR for that particular month for Zee TV will be calculated as: MRP of ZEE TV = Rs. 22.00 Monthly Average Active Subscriber Level for Zee TV reported by DTH OPERATOR = 10,000 subscribers for that month = Rs. 17.60 x 10,000 = Rs. 1,76,000 Note: The MRP and Subscription Fee mentioned hereinabove is exclusive of applicable taxes and levies.

  • Examples (A) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. §6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights. (B) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. §6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights. (C) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. §6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment. (D) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. §362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Example The ASCII label “EXAMPLE” shall be withheld from registration or allocated to Registry Operator at the second level and at all other levels within the TLD at which Registry Operator offers registrations (such second level and all other levels are collectively referred to herein as, “All Levels”). Such label may not be activated in the DNS, and may not be released for registration to any person or entity other than Registry Operator. Upon conclusion of Registry Operator’s designation as operator of the registry for the TLD, such withheld or allocated label shall be transferred as specified by ICANN. Registry Operator may self-­‐allocate and renew such name without use of an ICANN accredited registrar, which will not be considered Transactions for purposes of Section 6.1 of the Agreement.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: