Methodology Sample Clauses

Methodology. 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Methodology. The Contractor shall, at least 15 (fifteen) days prior to the commencement of the construction, submit to the Authority’s Engineer for review and consent the methodology proposed to be adopted for executing the Works, giving details of equipment to be deployed, traffic management and measures for ensuring safety. The Authority’s Engineer shall complete the review and convey its consent to the Contractor within a period of 10 (ten) days from the date of receipt of the proposed methodology from the Contractor.
Methodology. 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: (i) All known cash flows under swaps or forward exchange contracts shall be present valued to the swap zero coupon interest rate curve. (ii) All valuations shall employ prices and interest rates based on the actual frequency of rate reset or payment.
Methodology. CMS agrees to pay the MA Organization under this contract in accordance with the provisions of section 1853 of the Act and 42 CFR Part 422 Subpart G. [422.504(a)(9)]
Methodology. 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: (i) All known cash flows under swaps or forward exchange contracts shall be present valued to the swap zero coupon interest rate curve. (ii) All valuations shall employ prices and interest rates based on the actual frequency of rate reset or payment. (iii) Each tranche of amortizing contracts shall be separately valued. The total value of such amortizing contract shall be the sum of the values of its component tranches. (iv) For regularly traded contracts, valuations shall be at the midpoint of the bid and ask prices quoted by customary sources (e.g., The Wall Street Journal, Telerate, Reuters or other similar source) or regularly traded exchanges. (v) For all other Qualified Financial Contracts where published market quotes are unavailable, the adjusted price shall be the average of the bid and ask price quotes from three (3) securities dealers acceptable to the Receiver and Assuming Institution as of Bank Closing. If quotes from securities dealers cannot be obtained, an appraiser acceptable to the Receiver and the Assuming Institution will perform a valuation based on modeling, correlation analysis, interpolation or other techniques, as appropriate.
Methodology. British Columbia and UBCM will provide a description of the process used to collect data and information presented in the Housing Report. The methodology section should include the following information: • Scope of the report and related rationale. • Reporting process used to collect data from Ultimate Recipients. • Identification of baseline data and other data sets used for the purposes of the report and which data has been excluded. • How performance indicators were assessed in British Columbia.
Methodology. The Contractor shall, at least 15 (fifteen) days prior to the commencement of any construction activity, submit to the Authority Engineer for review the Method Statement proposed to be adopted for executing the Work, giving details of inspection checklist, quality parameters, equipment to be deployed, traffic management and measures for ensuring safety. The Authority Engineer shall complete the review and convey its comments, if any, to the Contractor within a period of 10 (ten) days from the date of receipt of the proposed method statement from the Contractor. The Contractor shall revise the method statements by incorporating these comments or else will advise the Authority Engineer reasons for not/partially including the same.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Methodology. 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: (i) All known cash flows under swaps or forward exchange contracts shall be present valued to the swap zero coupon interest rate curve. (ii) All valuations shall employ prices and interest rates based on the actual frequency of rate reset or payment. (iii) Each tranche of amortizing contracts shall be separately valued. The total value of such amortizing contract shall be the sum of the values of its component tranches. (iv) For regularly traded contracts, valuations shall be at the midpoint of the bid and ask prices quoted by customary sources (e.g., The Wall Street Journal, Telerate, Reuters or other similar source) or regularly traded exchanges. (v) For all other Qualified Financial Contracts where published market quotes are unavailable, the adjusted price shall be the average of the bid and ask price quotes from three (3) securities dealers acceptable to the Receiver and Assuming Institution as of Bank Closing. If quotes from securities dealers cannot be Module 1 — Whole Bank w/ Loss Share — P&A Peninsula Bank Version 2.06 Englewood, Florida May 24, 2010 obtained, an appraiser acceptable to the Receiver and the Assuming Institution will perform a valuation based on modeling, correlation analysis, interpolation or other techniques, as appropriate.] Module 1 — Whole Bank w/ Loss Share — P&A Peninsula Bank Version 2.06 Englewood, Florida May 24, 2010 EXHIBIT 4.13 INTERIM ASSET SERVICING ARRANGEMENT (a) With respect to each asset (or liability) designated from time to time by the Receiver to be serviced by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Arrangement, including any Assets sold by the Receiver but with respect to which the Receiver has an obligation to service or provide servicing support (such being designated as “Pool Assets”), during the term of this Arrangement, the Assuming Institution shall: (i) Promptly apply payments received with respect to any Pool Assets; (ii) Reverse and return insufficient funds checks; (iii) Pay (A) participation payments to participants in Loans, as and when received; and (B) tax and insurance bills on Pool Assets as t...
Methodology. CMS agrees to pay the M+C Organization under this contract in accordance with the provisions of section 1853 of the Act and subpart F of part 422. [422.502(a)(9)]
Methodology. At the time of the Triennial Study, historical costs (to include costs directly related to maintaining and administering policies, processing claims and reporting results) will be determined for the Policy Maintenance Factor identified above. For a given Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor the identified costs will be divided by the total historical number of units of measure for both the Reinsured Contracts and the retained block of business to derive an historical cost per unit. The historical cost per unit will be used as a prospective cost per unit for the next calendar year. For the two succeeding years in the period between the Triennial Studies the historical dollar amounts by Policy Maintenance Factor will be adjusted (rolled forward) for current year cost changes agreed to by the Reinsurer and the Company (in accordance with the procedures set forth below). This rolled forward historical cost will then be divided by the total historical number of units for the current period to determine a prospective cost per unit for the next calendar year. An additional adjustment, positive or negative, to the prospective cost per unit determined by either the Triennial Study or the two succeeding years may be negotiated between the parties. The additional adjustment is for special projected costs or benefits of productivity, process improvements, inflation, loss of scale, and any other cost variation which was not included in the prior Triennial Study or the succeeding roll forward. The combined prospective unit cost and additional adjustment is the Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor. The Expense Allowance will be determined quarterly and billed to the Reinsurer in three equal installments during the quarter at the end of the month. Each installment will be determined by multiplying the actual number of units at the beginning of the quarter covered by this Agreement times the Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor (divided by twelve).
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!