Impact Evaluation Sample Clauses

Impact Evaluation. The M&E Plan will include a description of the methods to be used for impact evaluations and plans for integrating the evaluation method into Project design. Based on in-country consultation with stakeholders, the strategies outlined below were jointly determined as having the strongest potential for rigorous impact evaluation. The M&E Plan will further outline in detail these methodologies. Final impact evaluation strategies are to be included in the M&E Plan. The following is a summary of the potential impact evaluation methodologies:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impact Evaluation. The WINcentive Savings program is part of an ongoing effort by MnCUN and Commonwealth, formerly D2D Fund, Inc. (D2D) to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers. Non-personally identifiable information provided to Trulync by the credit unions about account holders under the WINcentive program will be shared with D2D for research purposes D2D will be permitted to compile and analyze the data, and to share the data and analysis in furtherance of its charitable purposes. In the event that the data includes any personally identifiable information, D2D will not disclose that personally identifiable information to any third party; provided, however, that, if an individual program participant has authorized disclosure of such information in writing to one or more third parties, D2D may disclose such information in accordance with such participant's written authorization.
Impact Evaluation. The WinStrong Savings program is part of an ongoing effort by MnCUN and Commonwealth, formerly D2D Fund, Inc. (Commonwealth) to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers. Non-personally identifiable information provided to TruLync by the credit unions about account holders under the WinStrong program will be shared with Commonwealth for research purposes Commonwealth will be permitted to compile and analyze the data, and to share the data and analysis in furtherance of its charitable purposes. In the event that the data includes any personally identifiable information, Commonwealth will not disclose that personally identifiable information to any third party; provided, however, that, if an individual program participant has authorized disclosure of such information in writing to one or more third parties, Commonwealth may disclose such information in accordance with such participant’s written authorization.
Impact Evaluation. The granting authority may carry out impact evaluations of the action, measured against the objectives and indicators of the EU programme funding the grant. Such evaluations may be started during implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiaries and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent outside experts. The coordinator or beneficiaries must provide any information relevant to evaluate the impact of the action, including information in electronic format.
Impact Evaluation. The WINcentive Savings program is part of an ongoing effort by MnCUN and Commonwealth (formerly D2D Fund, Inc., “D2D”) to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers in Minnesota. Non-personally identifiable information provided to TruLync by the credit unions about account holders under the WINcentive program will be shared with D2D for research purposes D2D will be permitted to compile and analyze the data, and to share the data and analysis in furtherance of its charitable purposes. In the event that the data includes any personally identifiable information, D2D will not disclose that personally identifiable information to any third party; provided, however, that, if an individual program participant has authorized disclosure of such information in writing to one or more third parties, D2D may disclose such information in accordance with such participant’s written authorization.
Impact Evaluation. The WSA program is part of an ongoing effort by MnCUN and Commonwealth (formerly D2D Fund, Inc. “D2D”) to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers. Non-personally identifiable information provided to TruLync by the credit unions about account holders under the WSA program will be shared with Commonwealth for research purposes either their own or partner project organizations, including the Pew Charitable Trust. Commonwealth will be permitted to compile and analyze the data, and to share the data and analysis in furtherance of its
Impact Evaluation. The Bucks for Buckeyes Savings program is part of an ongoing effort by the Ohio Credit Union League and its research partners to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers. Non-personally identifiable information provided to TruLync by the credit unions about account holders under the Bucks for Buckeyes program will be shared for research purposes, which includes compiling and analyzing the data, and sharing the data and analysis in furtherance of charitable purposes to enhance financial literacy and savings habits. In the event that the data includes any personally identifiable information, such personally identifiable information will not be disclosed to any third party.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impact Evaluation. The Lucky Lagniappe Savings program is part of an ongoing effort by Louisiana Credit Union League (“LCUL”) and Commonwealth (formerly D2D Fund, Inc., “D2D”) to assess the impact of prize-linked savings programs on consumers in Louisiana. Non-personally identifiable information provided to TruLync by the Credit Union about account holders under the Lucky Lagniappe program will be shared with D2D for research purposes D2D will be permitted to compile and analyze the data, and to share the data and analysis in furtherance of its charitable purposes. In the event that the data includes any personally identifiable information, D2D will not disclose that personally identifiable information to any third party; provided, however, that, if an individual program participant has authorized disclosure of such information in writing to one or more third parties, D2D may disclose such information in accordance with such participant’s written authorization.
Impact Evaluation. In addition to SSP’s attention to results-based monitoring, SSP seeks to conduct a rigorous impact evaluation to determine, to the extent possible, the effects of its interventions on outcomes. Put simply, SSP will seek to answer the question, “To what change did SSP directly or indirectly contribute? Framed by SSP’s theory of change and the intended outcomes across the program’s Intermediate Results, SSP will coordinate with its various M&E partners at the MoEHE to use a mixed-methods and quasi-experimental evaluation design in order to test whether changes in specific outcomes can be attributed to the program. This framework compares data and findings collected from SSP beneficiaries (primarily principals, teachers, counselors, students and parents) against control groups (“counterfactuals“) who did not participate in the program. To meet its staffing needs for 3Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation model is described at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/pages/article/xxxxxxxxxxx.htm. fieldworkers and data collection, SSP, in partnership with LTD, will use its resources to provide researchers with advanced training in theories and methods of qualitative research. The following set of key research questions are derived from SSP’s Theory of Change (described above). Organized around SSP’s three Intermediate Results, these questions provide the conceptual framework that guides the development of research protocols and instruments for the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and findings, the sum of which will establish a logically coherent, systematic, and robust impact evaluation of SSP’s interventions and outcomes.
Impact Evaluation. 5.1. It is expected that applicants will work collaboratively with the DCHM programme and other providers to share lessons and capture learning in a structured way. This would include (but not limited to) scheme development with suppliers, being open and transparent about risks and opportunities, supporting proactive communications and celebrating achievements. Information shared will be strictly controlled and only used for the betterment of DCHM programmes or other NHSX schemes or other appropriate NHS bodies that would benefit from such learning or where it could support working at scale. 5.2. Where further understanding is required from applicants either during the scheme or post delivery applicants will work with the DCHM teams and their agents to achieve this.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!