Common use of Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative Clause in Contracts

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissions.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and there would be no potential for surface effects from underground mining activity associated with of the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissionstract.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 GHG emissions.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and there would be no mining activity potential for property value or quality of life effects associated with the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissionstract.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and there would be no mining activity potential for economic effects associated with the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissionstract.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground movement, quality, and no mining activity associated with availability of groundwater across the LBA tract would occur. Because no mining activity associated with not change from the LBA tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissionsexisting state as a function of mining.

Impacts of Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the BLM would not lease the coal contained within the LBA tract. As a result, federal coal deposits would remain in the ground and no mining activity associated with coal contained within the LBA tract would occurnot contribute to Oklahoma's bituminous coal production. Because no mining activity associated with Further, the LBA coal contained within the tract would occur under this alternative there would likewise be no PM10 emissions.not contribute to the availability of bituminous coal in the international market place