Implication. The implication, simply called “implication” here, is a relation that indicates what conclusion can be drawn by which premises (or simply: when/if A, then B). This means that the premises are the source and the conclusion is the target of the relation. Using the previously described inclusion types it is possible to build 1 Everything that is denoted as a Split or Merge is also a Control element for a certain type of relation. A concept can also be a Control element for several different relations at once. complex premises and conclusions for implications. Also in most cases the implication is not used directly, but specialised first, because it is too vague by itself. Additionally there is a special type of implication called Prohibition. It is simply the implication of the negated conclusion. The inverse is simply called “inverse implication”
Implication. A statement of fact which, when read in isolation, appears to be true may be untrue in context in view of what it implies. This is the case of the half truth. For example, if a drink is simply stated to contain tomato juice, the implication is that it contains nothing else of any significance (such as vodka). Examples from the cases include Cazenove, in which Xxxxxxx CB pointed out that it is untrue ‘when a person is asked how old he is, and he states, in answer, a number of years less than his true age [and it is nonsense] to say that that is a true answer which requires something to be added to it to make it true’. In Xxxxxx, the seller’s solicitor, stating to the buyer that he was not aware of any covenants restricting the use of the land as a brickyard, implied that he had checked the matter. In Curwen, one person, who induced another to buy shares by stating that he was buying the shares too, failed to mention that he was part owner of land which the company was about to acquire. Just as misleading was the statement in Galle Gowns, that the insurance applicant had traded in the past under one name, without mentioning another. A prominent recent example is that of the cost of the payment protection insurance being sold along with a loan.” [115] In Chitty 31st ed at paragraph 6-020 it is also accepted that a partial non- disclosure may amount to misrepresentation: “Partial Nondisclosure. Although total nondisclosure does not amount to a misrepresentation, a partial nondisclosure may do so. This may happen in a number of different ways. Thus a statement may be a misrepresentation even though it is literally true if it implies certain additional facts which are themselves false. A striking instance of this possibility is Xxxxxxxxx v Xxxxxx in which the Defendant who was negotiating for the purchase of the plaintiff’s yacht, informed the plaintiff, after paying a visit to the yacht, that she had rot in her keel. The Court of Appeal held that this statement implied that the defendant had actually examined the keel, and as he had not done so, this was itself a misrepresentation, whether or not the yacht did have rot in her keel. Again, a statement may amount to a misrepresentation if facts are omitted which render that which has actually been stated false or misleading in the context in which it is made. So, for example, where a shop assistant told a customer that a receipt for the cleaning of a dress which she was required to sign excluded liability for dam...
Implication. The review results would be helpful for public health experts and researchers who intend to conduct interventions or research of the food-producing industry under the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, among the countries, there were common practices to prevent COVID-19 transmission such as hand washing with soap, but there were several differences including a defined physical distancing and conditions for face coverings. Thus, to comprehend similarities and differences in guidance among the target countries would be crucial to plan for intervention to the countries. Furthermore, further studies about the evidence behind the country’s guidance might be also useful for future interventions or research. Finally, the information and situation regarding COVID-19 has been updating rapidly, including the COVID-19 vaccine. For instance, CDC issued an interim guidance, “Interim Public Health Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People” [86]. Thus, continued monitoring of the guidance documents or guidelines among countries would be helpful to understand the impact of the vaccination on practices to prevent COVID-19 from food workers and food producing workplaces.
Implication. Both parties shall support their joint activities, whenever it is feasible. Each party shall bear the costs for its participation in activities unless both parties shall agree otherwise.
Implication. Monsanto receives a single sum of money for the seed that includes the [**].
