Common use of Kohinoor Relators Pvt Clause in Contracts

Kohinoor Relators Pvt. Ltd., (2) Active Highrise Pvt. Ltd. and (3) Xxxxx Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 25.2 Decimal 39 Surpati Sales Pvt. Ltd. 2.80 Decimal THE SIXTH SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO: (Pending Litigation) There is a pending litigation in connection with the the said Property being suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the Plaintiff, Xx. Xxxxx Xxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxx, being T.S. No. 496 of 2015 in the Court of the Learned 1st Civil Judge Xx. Div. Plaintiff also filed an injunction application in the said Suit. Plaintiff sought for temporary order of injunction to restrain the defendant making any construction upon or beneath the suit property and also from lying any underground high tension line in portion thereof. By filing such injunction application, Plaintiff has also sought to restrain the defendant from interfering with the alleged enjoyment of the suit roads / paths in common from changing the nature and character thereof. The application of the plaintiff was rejected by order No. 33 dated on 21.07.2016 The Plaintiff have preferred misc. appeal no. 11502 of 2016 against the said order and the same is pending.

Kohinoor Relators Pvt. Ltd., (2) Active Highrise Pvt. Ltd. and (3) Xxxxx Ayush Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 25.2 Decimal 39 Surpati Sales Pvt. Ltd. 2.80 Decimal THE SIXTH SEVENTH SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO: (Pending Litigation) There is a pending litigation in connection with the the said Property being suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the Plaintiff, Xx. Xxxxx Xxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxx, being T.S. No. 496 of 2015 in the Court of the Learned 1st Civil Judge Xx. Div. Plaintiff also filed an injunction application in the said Suit. Plaintiff sought for temporary order of injunction to restrain the defendant making any construction upon or beneath the suit property and also from lying any underground high tension line in portion thereof. By filing such injunction application, Plaintiff has also sought to restrain the defendant from interfering with the alleged enjoyment of the suit roads / paths in common from changing the nature and character thereof. The application of the plaintiff was rejected by order No. 33 dated on 21.07.2016 The Plaintiff have preferred misc. appeal no. 11502 of 2016 against the said order and the same is pending.. Annexure “A” Unless, in this agreement, there be something contrary or repugnant to the subject or context:

Kohinoor Relators Pvt. Ltd., (2) Active Highrise Pvt. Ltd. and (3) Xxxxx Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 25.2 Decimal 39 Surpati Sales Pvt. Ltd. 2.80 Decimal THE SIXTH SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO: (Pending Litigation) There is a pending litigation in connection with the the said Property being suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the Plaintiff, Xx. Xxxxx Xxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxx, being T.S. No. 496 of 2015 in the Court of the Learned 1st Civil Judge Xx. Jr. Div. Plaintiff also filed an injunction application in the said Suit. Plaintiff sought for temporary order of injunction to restrain the defendant making any construction upon or beneath the suit property and also from lying any underground high tension line in portion thereof. By filing such injunction application, Plaintiff has also sought to restrain the defendant from interfering with the alleged enjoyment of the suit roads / paths in common from changing the nature and character thereof. The application of the plaintiff was rejected by order No. 33 dated on 21.07.2016 The Plaintiff have preferred misc. appeal no. 11502 of 2016 against the said order and the same is pending.

Kohinoor Relators Pvt. Ltd., (2) Active Highrise Pvt. Ltd. and (3) Xxxxx Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 25.2 Decimal 39 Surpati Sales Pvt. Ltd. 2.80 Decimal THE SIXTH SEVENTH SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO: (Pending Litigation) There is a pending litigation in connection with the the said Property being suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the Plaintiff, Xx. Xxxxx Xxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxx, being T.S. No. 496 of 2015 in the Court of the Learned 1st Civil Judge Xx. Jr. Div. Plaintiff also filed an injunction application in the said Suit. Plaintiff sought for temporary order of injunction to restrain the defendant making any construction upon or beneath the suit property and also from lying any underground high tension line in portion thereof. By filing such injunction application, Plaintiff has also sought to restrain the defendant from interfering with the alleged enjoyment of the suit roads / paths in common from changing the nature and character thereof. The application of the plaintiff was rejected by order No. 33 dated on 21.07.2016 The Plaintiff have preferred misc. appeal no. 11502 of 2016 against the said order and the same is pending.. Annexure “A” Unless, in this agreement, there be something contrary or repugnant to the subject or context: