Common use of Lack of competition Clause in Contracts

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member.. Rate Contract for Selection of Logistic Partner for e-Bazaar c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a(i) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. 1) the Bid is technically qualified; b. 2) the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. 3) the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. 4) there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. 5) the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b(ii) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c(iii) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d(iv) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) a. A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. i. the Bid is technically qualified; b. ii. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. iii. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. iv. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. v. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) b. The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts account’s member. c) c. In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) d. If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. Rate contract for Printing and Delivery of PVC Cards and other documents (After Pre-Bid) were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide RISL Rate Contract for Security Audit of Website(s) / Web Application(s) / portal(s) publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.. Final RFP-Rate Contract for Selection of Logistic Partner for e-Bazaar

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were etcwere fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In Xxxxxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bidsbids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bidsbids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bidbid, provided that: - a. the Bid bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid bid or re-re- invite Xxxx bids after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. Rate Contract for Setting up of Interactive Digital Amusement Gallery during various events a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry industry-friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. 1. the Bid is technically qualified; b. 2. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. 3. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. 4. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. 5. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of the bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in the delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, the market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria criteria, and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. ‌ a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-end- up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member.. Rate Contract for GPU based Workstations for WS&APS with Five Years O&M c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding documentdocument Rate Contract for Supply, installation and commissioning of additional Edge equipment’s under Surveillance and Incident Response Project in the State of Rajasthan (After Pre-bid) b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member.. Rate contract for Printing and Delivery of PVC Cards and other documents (Before Pre-Bid) c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.. RISL Final Rate Contract for Establishing Smart Classroom (After Pre-bid)

Lack of competition. a) A situation may arise where, if after evaluation of Bids, the bid evaluation committee may end-up with one responsive Bid only. In xxxx.Xx such situation, the bid evaluation committee would check as to whether while floating the NIB all necessary requirements to encourage competition like standard bid conditions, industry friendly specifications, wide publicity, sufficient time for formulation of Bids, etc etc. were fulfilled. If not, the NIB would NIBwould be re-floated after rectifying deficiencies. The bid process shall be considered valid even if there is one responsive Bid, provided that: - a. the Bid is technically qualified; b. the price quoted by the bidder is assessed to be reasonable; c. the Bid is unconditional and complete in all respects; d. there are no obvious indicators of cartelization amongst bidders; and e. the bidder is qualified as per the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria in the bidding document b) The bid evaluation committee shall prepare a justification note for approval by the next higher authority of the procuring entity, with the concurrence of the accounts member. c) In case of dissent by any member of bid evaluation committee, the next higher authority in delegation of financial powers shall decide as to whether to sanction the single Bid or re-re- invite Xxxx after recording reasons. d) If a decision to re-invite the Bids is taken, market assessment shall be carried out for estimation of market depth, eligibility criteria and cost estimate.