Common use of Limitation on Acceleration Clause in Contracts

Limitation on Acceleration. a) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan or this Agreement, in the event it is determined by an independent nationally recognized public accounting firm, which is engaged and paid for by the Company prior to the consummation of any transaction constituting a Change in Control (which for purposes of this Section 7 shall mean a change in ownership or control as determined in accordance with the regulations promulgated under Section 280G of the Code), which accounting firm shall in no event be the accounting firm for the entity seeking to effectuate the Change in Control (the “Accountant”), which determination shall be certified by the Accountant and set forth in a certificate delivered to the Participant not less than ten (10) business days prior to the Change in Control setting forth in reasonable detail the basis of the Accountant’s calculations (including any assumptions that the Accountant made in performing the calculations), that part or all of the consideration, compensation or benefits to be paid to such Participant under this Agreement constitute “parachute payments” under Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, then, if the aggregate present value of such parachute payments, singularly or together with the aggregate present value of any consideration, compensation or benefits to be paid to such Participant under any other plan, arrangement or agreement which constitute “parachute payments” (collectively, the “Parachute Amount”) exceeds the maximum amount that would not give rise to any liability under Section 4999 of the Code, the amounts constituting “parachute payments” which would otherwise be payable to such Participant or for such Participant’s benefit shall be reduced to the maximum amount that would not give rise to any liability under Section 4999 of the Code (the “Reduced Amount”); provided that such amounts shall not be so reduced if the Accountant determines that without such reduction such Participant would be entitled to receive and retain, on a net after-tax basis (including, without limitation, any excise taxes payable under Section 4999 of the Code), an amount which is greater than the amount, on a net after-tax basis, that such Participant would be entitled to retain upon receipt of the Reduced Amount. In connection with making determinations under this Section 7, the Accountant shall take into account any positions to mitigate any excise taxes payable under Section 4999 of the Code, such as the value of any reasonable compensation for services to be rendered by the Participant before or after the Change in Control, including any amounts payable to such Participant following such Participant’s termination of employment hereunder with respect to any non-competition provisions that may apply to such Participant, and the Company shall cooperate in the valuation of any such services, including any non-competition provisions. b) If the determination made pursuant to this Section 7 results in a reduction of the payments that would otherwise be paid to the Participant except for the application of this Section 7, the Company shall promptly give such Participant notice of such determination. Such reduction in payments shall be first applied to reduce any cash payments that such Participant would otherwise be entitled to receive under this Agreement or otherwise and shall thereafter be applied to reduce other payments and benefits, in each case, in reverse order beginning with the payments or benefits that are to be paid the furthest in time from the date of such determination, unless, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, such Participant elects to have the reduction in payments applied in a different order; provided that, in no event may such payments be reduced in a manner that would result in subjecting such Participant to additional taxation under Section 409A of the Code. c) As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code at the time of a determination hereunder, it is possible that amounts will have been paid or distributed by the Company to or for the Participant’s benefit pursuant to this Agreement which should not have been so paid or distributed (each, an “Overpayment”) or that additional amounts which will have not been paid or distributed by the Company to or for the Participant’s benefit pursuant to this Agreement could have been so paid or distributed (each, an “Underpayment”), in each case, consistent with the calculation of the Reduced Amount hereunder. In the event that the Accountant, based upon the assertion of a deficiency by the Internal Revenue Service against either the Company or the Participant which the Accountant believes has a high probability of success, determines that an Overpayment has been made, any such Overpayment paid or distributed by the Company to or for such Participant’s benefit shall be repaid by such Participant to the Company together with interest at the applicable federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Code; provided, however, that no such repayment shall be required if and to the extent such deemed repayment would not either reduce the amount on which such Participant is subject to tax under Sections 1 and 4999 of the Code or generate a refund of such taxes. In the event that the Accountant, based on controlling precedent or substantial authority, determines that an Underpayment has occurred, any such Underpayment shall be promptly paid by the Company to or for such Participant’s benefit together with interest at the applicable federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Code. d) In the event of any dispute with the Internal Revenue Service (or other taxing authority) with respect to the application of this Section 7, the Participant shall control the issues involved in such dispute and make all final determinations with regard to such issues. The Company shall promptly pay, upon demand by such Participant, all legal fees, court costs, fees of experts and other costs and expenses which such Participant incurs in any actual, threatened or contemplated contest of such Participant’s interpretation of, or determination under, the provisions of this Section 7.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Special Retention Rsu Agreement (Time Warner Inc.), Special Retention Restricted Stock Units Agreement (Time Warner Inc.), Special Retention Rsu Agreement (Time Warner Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Limitation on Acceleration. a) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan or this Agreement, in the event it is determined by an independent nationally recognized public accounting firm, which is engaged and paid for by the Company prior to the consummation of any transaction constituting a Change in Control (which for purposes of this Section paragraph 7 shall mean a change in ownership or control as determined in accordance with the regulations promulgated under Section 280G of the Code), which accounting firm shall in no event be the accounting firm for the entity seeking to effectuate the Change in Control (the “Accountant”), which determination shall be certified by the Accountant and set forth in a certificate delivered to the Participant not less than ten (10) business days prior to the Change in Control setting forth in reasonable detail the basis of the Accountant’s calculations (including any assumptions that the Accountant made in performing the calculations), that part or all of the consideration, compensation or benefits to be paid to such Participant under this Agreement constitute “parachute payments” under Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, then, if the aggregate present value of such parachute payments, singularly or together with the aggregate present value of any consideration, compensation or benefits to be paid to such Participant under any other plan, arrangement or agreement which constitute “parachute payments” (collectively, the “Parachute Amount”) exceeds the maximum amount that would not give rise to any liability under Section 4999 of the Code, the amounts constituting “parachute payments” which would otherwise be payable to such Participant or for such Participant’s benefit shall be reduced to the maximum amount that would not give rise to any liability under Section 4999 of the Code (the “Reduced Amount”); provided that such amounts shall not be so reduced if the Accountant determines that without such reduction such Participant would be entitled to receive and retain, on a net after-tax basis (including, without limitation, any excise taxes payable under Section 4999 of the Code), an amount which is greater than the amount, on a net after-tax basis, that such Participant would be entitled to retain upon receipt of the Reduced Amount. In connection with making determinations under this Section paragraph 7, the Accountant shall take into account any positions to mitigate any excise taxes payable under Section 4999 of the Code, such as the value of any reasonable compensation for services to be rendered by the Participant before or after the Change in Control, including any amounts payable to such Participant following such Participant’s termination of employment hereunder with respect to any non-competition provisions that may apply to such Participant, and the Company shall cooperate in the valuation of any such services, including any non-competition provisions. b) If the determination made pursuant to this Section paragraph 7 results in a reduction of the payments that would otherwise be paid to the Participant except for the application of this Section paragraph 7, the Company shall promptly give such Participant notice of such determination. Such reduction in payments shall be first applied to reduce any cash payments that such Participant would otherwise be entitled to receive under this Agreement or otherwise and shall thereafter be applied to reduce other payments and benefits, in each case, in reverse order beginning with the payments or benefits that are to be paid the furthest in time from the date of such determination, unless, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, such Participant elects to have the reduction in payments applied in a different order; provided that, in no event may such payments be reduced in a manner that would result in subjecting such Participant to additional taxation under Section 409A of the Code. c) As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code at the time of a determination hereunder, it is possible that amounts will have been paid or distributed by the Company to or for the Participant’s benefit pursuant to this Agreement which should not have been so paid or distributed (each, an “Overpayment”) or that additional amounts which will have not been paid or distributed by the Company to or for the Participant’s benefit pursuant to this Agreement could have been so paid or distributed (each, an “Underpayment”), in each case, consistent with the calculation of the Reduced Amount hereunder. In the event that the Accountant, based upon the assertion of a deficiency by the Internal Revenue Service against either the Company or the Participant which the Accountant believes has a high probability of success, determines that an Overpayment has been made, any such Overpayment paid or distributed by the Company to or for such Participant’s benefit shall be repaid by such Participant to the Company together with interest at the applicable federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Code; provided, however, that no such repayment shall be required if and to the extent such deemed repayment would not either reduce the amount on which such Participant is subject to tax under Sections 1 and 4999 of the Code or generate a refund of such taxes. In the event that the Accountant, based on controlling precedent or substantial authority, determines that an Underpayment has occurred, any such Underpayment shall be promptly paid by the Company to or for such Participant’s benefit together with interest at the applicable federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Code. d) In the event of any dispute with the Internal Revenue Service (or other taxing authority) with respect to the application of this Section paragraph 7, the Participant shall control the issues involved in such dispute and make all final determinations with regard to such issues. The Company shall promptly pay, upon demand by such Participant, all legal fees, court costs, fees of experts and other costs and expenses which such Participant incurs in any actual, threatened or contemplated contest of such Participant’s interpretation of, or determination under, the provisions of this Section paragraph 7.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Restricted Stock Units Agreement (Time Warner Inc.), Performance Stock Units Agreement (Time Warner Inc.), Performance Stock Units Agreement (Time Warner Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!