Common use of Limits on Indirect Costs Clause in Contracts

Limits on Indirect Costs. The technical assistance provider’s indirect costs associated with administering the technical assistance portion of the Tribal Allocation Subaccount shall not exceed 30.9% of the overall costs in providing technical assistance under subparagraph 2.1.1.1 (i.e., of the 5% portion that will be used for technical assistance, no more than 30.9% of the 5% portion may consist of indirect costs). For purposes of this subparagraph, “indirect costs” are those costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. As required by subparagraph 2.1.1.2, the technical assistance provider shall separately set forth the indirect costs in each annual budget submitted to the Trustee. These indirect costs are subject to the limitations in the Federal Acquisition Regulations at 48 C.F.R. § 31.205.

Limits on Indirect Costs. The technical assistance provider’s indirect costs associated with administering the technical assistance portion of the Tribal Allocation Subaccount shall not exceed 30.9% of the overall costs in providing technical assistance under subparagraph 2.1.1.1 (i.e., of the 5% portion that will be used for technical assistance, no more than 30.9% of the 5% portion may consist of indirect costs). For purposes of this subparagraph, “indirect costs” are those costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. As required by subparagraph 2.1.1.22.1.1.3, the technical assistance provider shall separately set forth the indirect costs in each annual budget submitted to the Trustee. These indirect costs are subject to the limitations in the Federal Acquisition Regulations at 48 C.F.R. § 31.205.