Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager. b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition. c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change. d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign. e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager. f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager. g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: E3CAF342-1404-4A6C-B0C0-996184AD9D50
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E4A752-772F-4379-A290-87107DAE5C0E
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F50FF9CD9-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B8DBA-4C1D-830B-1D3FD05F957E
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F7400D0E8-EC074E51-48BC-8AD34C66-4877420D000B8168-834BC17080D8
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: F977C999-9391-4B1E-8882-3E74EBE07795
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F2A5FB8E4-EC07AAEE-4A51-48BC-8AD38B59-4877420D000BF7F585FE00C0
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F64016872-EC07DC4D-49C1-48BC-8AD38D18-4877420D000BFD7DFF98928F
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: E287E48D-8F33-4054-912A-C044092E62B0
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187FD390AF88-EC07486C-4A6C-48BC-8AD3BF23-4877420D000BD8805298920F
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F0854612D-7221-EC074710-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BA8BB-723E4CD1F1B1
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A04EEDE-3054-4F40-8564-D51EF478BFB7 DocuSign Envelope ID: B1672469-35E9-4BB1-9C3A-767FCDA38E1E
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F512EC1BA-27D1-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B47CD-8A7A-004BF8B3676E
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187FA9CF7CD5-EC07613A-45BD-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BABDD-6D74489F04DC
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F3821E038-EC0749E4-48BC-8AD3416B-4877420D000B
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due AD40-59739FF7B5D9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C0DB6A1-8255-47A6-9739-E507A96B9112 degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspectionbe changed.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: BB486DEE-180A-4C7A-86D9-81AA36566816
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187FD5C0651A-0082-EC07446C-94D2-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due 2FED883BC58A degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspectionbe changed.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. DocuSign Envelope ID: B6695AF6-F628-4ABD-BC02-4DF780668CEB Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Only the proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.state bridge coordinator
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures ; or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list needs to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerbe changed.
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to be changed. This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.DocuSign Envelope ID: 627F8358-8A7B-4817-B186-D6227793E3AE
g. e. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing important sheets such as a title sheet, layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document year built, design load, widenings, or other essential items. The Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans sets that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many For culverts may only that do not have layout sheets available the Engineer shall substitute the Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F-EC07-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000BSheet.
h. f. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date with delayed inspections — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, construction, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F364E1665-EC07C53D-43E3-48BC-8AD3B672-4877420D000B491A0BB3FA60
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. The Engineer shall provide the State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the each work authorization. The State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, The Engineer shall report this information to the list format must include State in the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as Excel spreadsheet titled “List of Structures” which is provided to the NBI number and Engineer by the data outlined belowState. Off-system System bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system On-System bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, the Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number. At the end of each work authorization the Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos (where required) to the State District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the State Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections Fracture Critical and/or Underwater Inspection — This list must shall include bridges to be added to the State’s current fracture critical or and underwater lists. Structures already coded for these types of inspections shall not be included in this list. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, the Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component the component(s) requiring a diving inspection. Engineer Photographs shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos be appended to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Managerlist using a format similar to that describe in Section 15.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, the Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. c. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will must be reported in decimal decimal-degree format, carried out to eight places. Engineer Proposed coordinates shall e-mail a copy of this list be reported to the TxDOT District State Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program ManagerCoordinator.
f. d. List of bridges with missing scour documentation or recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item NBI Items 113 and 113) — .
1. This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet with: 1) scour documentation that needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187F517DD8EC-82B3-EC074B01-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due B9ED-9BE0F8A2F1DA degradation); or 2) missing scour documents/improper documents; or 3) Scour coding that needs to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspectionbe changed.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
Lists of Structures. Engineer shall provide State with the following lists of structures, as both hard copies and as native Microsoft Excel files, updated with each submittal, and a cumulative version at the end of the work authorization. State will not accept Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. For each bridge, the list format must include the facility carried and feature crossed, as well as the NBI number and the data outlined below. Off-system bridges must be grouped by local jurisdiction. On- system bridge lists must be grouped by County and Maintenance Section Number. Within each grouping, Engineer shall list bridges in increasing order by NBI number.
a. List of bridges recommended for special inspections — This list must include bridges to be added to State’s current fracture critical or underwater lists. The list shall also identify structures that have those special inspections performed but have no corresponding reports in the folder. Engineer shall include a photo of the components that require the fracture critical or underwater inspection. The list must include a brief comment describing the fracture critical element to be inspected. For structures that require an underwater inspection, Engineer shall provide the depth of water at a component requiring a diving inspection. Engineer shall also list missing reports. Engineer shall email a copy of this list and photos to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
b. List of bridges with any condition rating of 4 or lower — This list shall include all bridges with any component rated 4 or lower. Engineer shall (1) report whether the condition rating is new or previously existed; (2) identify the component NBIS Item (e.g., 58, 59), its current condition rating, and previous condition rating; and (3) give a brief description of condition.
c. List of bridges requiring changes in Operational Status — This list includes all bridges that require changes in operational status (e.g., bridges that do not meet State Load Posting Policy and require load restrictions, bridges that no longer require posting, bridges that are newly under construction, bridges that are newly closed). Engineer shall provide the old and new coding for Operational Status (NBIS Item 41.0) and a brief description of the reason for the change.
d. List of bridges with recommended changes in vertical clearance signs (off-system bridges only) — For each proposed sign change, Engineer shall provide the existing signed clearance, the minimum measured clearance, and the clearance for the proposed sign.
e. List of bridges with missing or inaccurate GPS coordinates — Coordinates will be reported in decimal format, carried out to eight places. Engineer shall e-mail a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Office and the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
f. List of bridges with recommended coding changes for scour critical (NBIS Item 113) — This list includes structures whose analysis or Scour Summary Sheet needs to be reevaluated because of changes in site conditions (e.g., improvement, repair, degradation). This list must also identify structures that require a scour analysis, scour summary, or Plan of Action, where none exists. Engineer shall provide a copy of this list to the TxDOT District Bridge Inspection Coordinator and, by email, to the TxDOT Bridge Inspection Program Manager.
g. List of bridges needing plan sheets — This list includes bridges that have no plans in their folders or are missing sheets such as a layout, detail sheet, or other sheets that document design load, widenings, or other essential items. Engineer shall provide the year of construction, Control-Section-Job Number, and a brief description of sheets or plans that are needed. The goal is to document geometry, design load, and elemental quantities without unduly adding bulk to the folders. Many culverts may only have Plan and Profile and Standard sheets available. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1263187FEAF44E7D-EC07BD0D-46A2-48BC-8AD3-4877420D000B85EC-40F822A6F10D
h. List of bridges inspected after inspection due date — This list includes bridges whose routine inspection occurred after the inspection due date, due to unforeseen circumstances such as weather, scheduling, etc. The list must identify previous inspection date, current inspection date, and reason for the delayed inspection.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract for Engineering Services
