Making Decisions Sample Clauses

Making Decisions. All decisions of the Management Committee shall be by majority vote by the two voting Representatives, who shall each have the number of votes equal to such Representative's respective Party's Joint Venture Interest from time to time. In the event of an equality of votes, the Operator's Representative shall have an additional and casting vote. Alternatively, the Management Committee may transact any business by a written instrument signed by a Representative of each Party. Each decision of the Management Committee shall be final and binding on the Parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Making Decisions. The Client shall ensure that his decisions, instructions, consents or approvals on or to all matters properly referred to him shall be given in such reasonable time so as not to delay or disrupt the performance of the Services by the Consulting Engineer.
Sample 1Sample 2
Making Decisions. MET’s member agencies decide policy. Ignore the policies themselves for a moment and consider how conflict in the decision- making process—delay, vote cycling, xxxxx- ing goals and/or partisan agenda setting— can raise transaction costs and destroy sur- plus.15 Decision-making at MET grew more costly in the 70s for three reasons: Xxxxxx’x 15These losses are over-and-above the basic transactions costs present in all organizations, e.g., internal negotiations, wrong decisions, etc.
Sample 1
Making Decisions a. Consensus: A consensus of the entire group present at any meeting will first be attempted, to see if everyone can live with the proposed decision. If that is not possible, decisions can be made over the dissent of a maximum of one person from each side present at the meeting. If more than one person from each side dissents, there is not a decision. (One person saying “no” does get paid attention to.) b. Decisions of the group will be supported by everyone in the group. No one person’s opinion will be identified outside the group.
Sample 1
Making Decisions. (a) Under Government Requirements no one who discussed a decision with the decision-maker or who took part in making a decision mentioned in section 5.4 (Kinds of Decisions under Government Requirements) can take part in the review of that decision. Under Government Requirements, anyone taking part in reviewing the decision must be knowledgeable about the relevant Government Requirements and Local Rules. When the Co-op is responsible for the reviews of any of the decisions mentioned in section 6.4, the original decisions will be made, in whole or in part, by:  a staff person  a support services agency (if applicable) or  another party. (b) Who makes the decision may be different depending on the type of decision. The board will decide who will make the decision. The board will ask the decision-maker to sign a confidentiality agreement, if the confidentiality provisions of the Co-op’s by-laws do not apply to them, unless they are bound by professional or other adequate confidentiality obligations.
Sample 1
Making Decisions. (a) The board will pass a motion to create a membership committee. The Organizational By-law sections will apply to it. (b) The board will decide how many members are on the committee. The committee could be a committee with only one member. (c) The board will decide who makes up the committee. The board can decide to include directors, non-directors, staff or any combination. Any volunteers must be approved by board motion. (d) The board will decide the duties of the committee. (e) The committee will report to the board on each application and will normally include a recommendation to accept or refuse the application. (f) The board can decide to accept or refuse the application. If a review is requested, it will be conducted by the board. Directors who were on the Membership Committee that made the original report to the board cannot participate in the review as directors.
Sample 1
Making Decisions. Decisions regarding the development of our CHR will all be made at Steering Group or Working Group meetings. The Steering Group will comprise of representatives from each of the partner organisations – up to a maximum of four representatives per organisation. Each of the CHR partners commits to always having at least one representative in attendance at Steering Group meetings. At key stages throughout the process we will open up attendance at the Steering Group to include Committee Members, in order to keep Committees involved in the process. When decisions require to be taken at Steering Group meetings, we will aim to make decisions on a consensual basis. However, we recognise that there will be occasions where views differ and a decision will require to be made on the basis of a vote. In these circumstances, each partner present will have one vote. On the rare occasion where partners are unable to send any representative, they will be allowed to inform the facilitator of the meeting (CHR Co-ordinator/ lead partner) of their position on issues, and their vote lodged in this way. This cannot be done more than once a year, and thereafter partners not in attendance will forfeit their right to vote. Where a vote is tied, the vote of all five partners will be sought in order to resolve the issue. The Steering Group may delegate responsibility for some decisions to ‘Working Groups’ focussed on particular issues. Decisions at Working Groups will be taken on the same basis as Steering Group decisions. When delegating responsibility, the Steering Group will produce a written statement of delegated authority, which states the matters for which the Working Group will have responsibility, and the Steering Group’s commitment to abide by Working Group decisions. We commit to working together to develop a Common Housing Register in Argyll and Bute by May 2006. This CHR will involve co-ordinated, holistic housing information and advice provision; a common database of applicants and a common form for gathering applicant data. The CHR will be developed through an equal partnership between all participating organisations.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Making Decisions

  • Major Decisions (A) Subject to Sections 7.3(C) and 7.3(D) with respect to the Company, all major decisions of the Company set forth below in clauses (A)(1) through (A)(6) (“Major Decisions”) shall be subject to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and joint approval by the Advisor and Sub-advisor. For the avoidance of doubt, Major Decisions specifically exclude any decisions regarding the day-to-day operations of the Company, the decision-making authority for which has been delegated to the Sub-advisor pursuant to this Agreement. Major Decisions shall consist of the following: (1) Decisions to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Company acquire or sell Properties, Loans and other Permitted Investments; (2) Retention of investment banks for the Company; (3) Marketing methods for the Company’s sale of Shares; (4) Extending, initiating or terminating the Initial Public Offering or any subsequent Offering of the Shares; (5) Issuing press releases involving the major decisions of the Company or the Advisor or Sub-advisor or their Affiliates with respect to the business or operations of the Company; provided, that the Sub-advisor need not obtain consent to any press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions of Properties, Loans or other Permitted Investments; and provided further, however, that notwithstanding the immediately preceding proviso, any mention of the Advisor or its Affiliates in such press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions shall be pre-approved by the Advisor; and (6) Merging or otherwise engaging in any change of control transaction for the Company. (B) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Parties do not agree to any action constituting a Major Decision that is described in any of clauses (A)(2) through (A)(6) above and that has been proposed by either Party, the Parties shall meet (in person or by phone) to discuss the issue in dispute in good faith over the five-business day period beginning with the delivery of notice of the proposed action to the other Party. (C) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to Major Decisions described in clause (A)(1) above (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), (1) joint approval shall not be required, (2) the Sub-advisor and the Advisor shall discuss the proposed transaction (either in person or by phone) prior to either Party making any recommendation of the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, and (3) the Sub-Advisor and the Advisor shall each give due consideration to the opinions of the other Party. Ordinarily, such discussions shall begin at least five business days before a recommendation is made to the Board of Directors; however, if in the sole discretion of the Sub-advisor it is in the best interest of the Company to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors more promptly, then the Sub-advisor may do so. In the event the Parties do not agree as to whether to recommend the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, the Sub-advisor’s decision shall govern. (D) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.3 or any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, in all events, including Major Decisions, the Company will be managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. (E) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), the Sub-advisor shall have sole authority to act on behalf of the Company regarding amending the Advisory Agreement.

  • Accounting Decisions All decisions as to accounting principles, except as specifically provided to the contrary herein, shall be made by the General Partner.

  • Credit Decisions Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such Lender’s review of the financial information of the Borrower, the Loan Documents (the terms and provisions of which being satisfactory to such Lender) and such other documents, information and investigations as such Lender has deemed appropriate, made its own credit decision to extend its Commitments. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such other documents, information and investigations as it shall deem appropriate at any time, continue to make its own credit decisions as to exercising or not exercising from time to time any rights and privileges available to it under the Loan Documents.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when: a) i. such decisions are made by the data importer in entering into or performing a contract with the data subject, and

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Effect of Decision The decision or award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the University, the UFF, and the grievant, provided that either party may appeal to an appropriate court of law a decision that was rendered by the arbitrator acting outside of or beyond the arbitrator's jurisdiction, pursuant to Section 682.13, Florida Statutes.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!