Common use of MECA Interpretation Clause in Contracts

MECA Interpretation. It is agreed that consistent interpretation and application of the national MECA is in the interests of both parties and their respective constituencies. The parties acknowledge that there may be legitimate differences in interpretation and application of the clauses of the MECA given the often imprecise nature of industrial documents, and the inability of the parties to these documents to foresee all circumstances and situations that might arise in the course of an RMO’s employment. The NREG will sponsor a standing group on MECA interpretation comprising an agreed number of nominees. Each party will put forward its own nominees. This group will identify clauses in the current MECA that are subject of differing interpretation and application, will collate and review these differing interpretations, and endeavour to recommend a common agreed interpretation and application. The group can also provide pro-active recommendations on anticipated issues. NZRDA or a DHB can bring any clause to the Group for discussion. Where a common interpretation and application is agreed by the Group, this will be provided to NREG for endorsement. NREG may agree to publish a joint interpretation guideline to DHBs and RMOs and/or recommend a variation to the current wording of the MECA clause to address any uncertainty. Any such variations shall be subject to the relevant MECA process (MECA clause 3.1).