Missed Deadlines Clause Samples
The Missed Deadlines clause establishes the consequences and procedures that apply when a party fails to meet agreed-upon timeframes in a contract. Typically, this clause outlines what constitutes a missed deadline, the notification process, and any grace periods or penalties that may be triggered, such as late fees or the right to terminate the agreement. Its core practical function is to ensure accountability and provide a clear framework for addressing delays, thereby minimizing disputes and keeping the project or transaction on schedule.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 5 times
Missed Deadlines. In the event that we miss a deadline for submission of ACH Entries, whether due to our delay or delay by you, we shall not be liable to you for such delay, but shall use reasonable efforts to meet the next succeeding ACH deadline.
Missed Deadlines. If the Director or Chancellor does not provide a decision within the specified time, the grievance shall be deemed denied, and the Union may file at the next step. If an A/P staff member, group of A/P staff members, or the Union fails to timely file the grievance or an appeal, it shall be considered automatically withdrawn.
Missed Deadlines. Parties failed to meet the September 1, 1997 deadline for including technical barriers with policy implications within the scope and coverage of Chapter 9. Recognizing the difficulties encountered when attempting to dismantle trade barriers on a case by case basis, agriculture ministers agreed at a meet ing in July 1997 to work instead at developing a set of principles to be included in the Chapter 9 that wo uld discourage the establishment of new barriers and ensure t he same treatment for producers in all provinces and territories. This proposal will be discussed with stakeholders in the coming year and reconsidered by Ministers in 1998. Under pr essu re fr om its dairy lobby, Quebec decided to ignore a commitment made in the AIT to eliminate its requirements governing margarine colouring by September 1, 1997. As a result, Unilever Canada Ltd., which sells ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇, Monarch and Becel margarine, has prompted a challenge of the Quebec restrictions under both the NAFTA and AIT. Quebec’s longst ▇▇▇▇▇▇ reg ulations prevent margarine sold in the province from being butter-coloured. Until recently, Ontario and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ had similar requirements on margarine colour. However, they have not enforced them since provincial and territorial Ministers of Agriculture agreed in 1994 to eliminate the restrictions, a commitment that was later made part of the AIT. The AIT commitment was made, not because Ministers were particularly intent on removing internal barriers to ▇▇ ▇▇▇ in agricultural products, but because they believed that such restrictions were in violation of Canada’s international trade obligations and would have to be removed in any event. As a result of Quebec’s regulations, manufacturers are forced to maintain separate inventor ies for the pro ▇▇▇▇▇, which increases t heir cost of doing business. Manufacturers and oilseed producers see the Quebec measures as both an internal trade restriction and as another example of the lengt hs to which the go vernment will go to pro tect dairy pro ducers against fair compet ition from non-dairy substitutes. The Quebec market for margarine is estimated to be $60 million. The AIT challenge was brought in November 1997 by the Government of Ontario, since Unilever, as a business entity, does not have direct access to the Agreement’s dispute sett lement provisions. The next stage in the resolution of the disput e is formal consultat ions between the t wo go vernments. If nego tiatio ns fail to resolve the issue, ei...
Missed Deadlines. (a) Unless otherwise modified by Terna and the Company, if Terna fails to meet any of the following deadlines, other than for a reason representing a Justifiable Delay Event, each such deadline will constitute an “NI Level 1 Missed Deadline”: