Mother’s decision Sample Clauses

Mother’s decision making autonomy and grandparent(s) in the household Mother’s high decision-making autonomy was 77.2% in the study population and 81.5% among mothers of children excluded from this analysis. Roughly half of children from both the study population (54.3%) and those excluded (54.7%) lived with paternal grandparent(s) in the household, where 38.3% and 41.9% of household heads were a grandparent, respectively. High decision-making autonomy was higher among mothers who lived in households with no grandparents present (84%) than mothers who lived in households with any type of grandparent (e.g., 67%-74% for mothers who lived with a child’s grandparent) (Table 2). Table 3 presents the unadjusted and adjusted associations of maternal decision-making autonomy, the presence of grandparents in the household as (1) co-residents of the household and (2) head of the household, as well as other socio-demographic factors with child XXX. In the unadjusted analysis, we observed no statically significant association between high decision- making autonomy and child HAZ in comparison to low decision-making autonomy (unadjusted: -0.08 [-0.25, 0.095]; adjusted: 0.04 [-0.21, 0.14]). Relative to children with no grandparents in the home, children with paternal grandparent(s) only in the household had 0.33 SD higher height-for-age. This association remained positive but was weaker and no longer statistically significant in the adjusted model, suggesting that the value of grandparents may be mediated through the socio-demographic variables. No other types of grandparents were statistically significantly associated with child HAZ. Children from households where a grandparent was the household head had higher HAZ scores (0.36, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.49) in comparison to children from households where their father was the head. This association was positive but not statistically significant in the adjusted model (0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, 0.35). When individual maternal autonomy indicators were observed separately in relation to HAZ (see Supplemental Table 2), only action taken when the mother herself falls sick was significantly, but negatively, associated with height-for-age in the unadjusted models (-0.13, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.01). When adjusted for all other variables and covariates, the indicator was still negatively and significantly associated with height-for-age (-0.34, 95% CI: -0.50, -0.17). Two other indicators were also significant, but positively: decisions to buy land or property (0.25, 9...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Mother’s decision

  • Arbitrator’s Decision 27.3.3.1 The arbitrator's decision and award shall be in writing and shall state concisely the reasons for the award, including the arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Advice of Minister’s decision (2) The Minister shall within two months after receipt of proposals pursuant to subclause (1) of Clause 7 or where the proposals are to be assessed under section 40(1)(b) of the EP Act then within two months after service on him of an authority under section 45(7) of the EP Act give notice to the Company of his decision in respect to the proposals. Consultation with Minister

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Failure to Comply with Arbitrator’s Decision 10.6.1 The award of such Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.