Moving Forward. To the extent the parties have other specific changes that they wish to make to the contract, they can be set forth on separate pages, which is the practice for other trading contracts. If market practice demonstrates widespread adoption of certain changes, the working group will examine whether to revise the contract accordingly. This is a dynamic contract, for a dynamic market. We fully expect the market to rapidly develop beyond the contract as currently written, but hope to set forth what parties should keep in mind when they seek to transact in RECs, while at the same time providing a functioning document that enables parties to transact in RECs right now. The drafters recognize that this market is nascent and we hope it will mature on our watch into a robust market mechanism to allocate resources to achieve the goals of renewable resource development.
Moving Forward. SSI and its Subsidiaries agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts to allow moving forward any scheduled delivery of Co-branded Product as may be reasonably necessary to meet the needs of any Distributor or End User or its Subsidiaries. In the event that StorageTek or any of its Subsidiaries requests expedited delivery, SSI or its Subsidiaries shall use reasonable efforts to accommodate such request and advise StorageTek or its Subsidiaries whether SSI or its Subsidiaries can accept the Contract in the time requested and of any additional costs associated with expedited delivery. If StorageTek or its Subsidiaries accepts such additional costs, in writing, then SSI or its Subsidiaries shall use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the Co-branded Products in the expedited time requested, and StorageTek or its Subsidiaries shall pay for such expedited products at their price plus the agreed to additional costs of expediting.
Moving Forward. The Parties agree in principle to move forward to: • establish a Cooperative System reflecting the principles set out in this Agreement; • use their best efforts to cause their respective legislatures to enact or approve the legislation, legislative amendments or regulations necessary to implement the Cooperative System; and • enter into all agreements and take all actions necessary to give effect to this Agreement including an agreement for the integration of a capital markets regulatory body or function of a provincial Participating Jurisdiction with an integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority that would contemplate: • a services agreement for the interim provision of services (which will include the full secondment to the CMR of authority employees involved in capital markets regulation) on a cost-recovery basis by the integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction to the CMR to assist in administering the Cooperative Legislation and delivering capital markets regulatory services within national standards in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction for a period of three years commencing on the operational launch date of the CMR. Employees of an integrated financial regulatory consumer protection authority who are seconded to the CMR and are delivering on behalf of the CMR capital markets regulatory services pursuant to the services agreement shall be identified as working on behalf of the CMR, shall work in premises identified with the CMR and shall be under the sole control and direction of the CMR on all matters relating to capital markets regulation under, and the interpretation and application of, the Cooperative Legislation and shall be fully accountable to the CMR with respect to all such activities. The CMR may audit costs and monitor service levels for all services provided pursuant to the services agreement; and • an agreement being reached no later than one year prior to the expiry date of the services agreement setting forth the terms of the staged transfer and/or assignment of all employees, assets and contracts of the integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority involved in or relating to capital markets regulation in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction to the CMR on the basis of certain stipulated benchmarks to be agreed to with all such transfers and/or assignments being completed by the expiry date of the services agreement.
Moving Forward. Xxxxx’ work has major implications for the study of inaugurated resurrection. Although his focus was not first and foremost resurrection, he offers a fruitful way forward in the study of inaugurated resurrection in early Christianity. In many ways, this present study builds upon his thesis, particularly his emphasis on the way that Xxxxxxx 36–37 played a key role in influencing Xxxx’s understanding of the Spirit. As noted above, the battleground for demonstrating that Xxxx did or did not believe in inaugurated resurrection is usually Romans 6.1–14, since it is the only passage in the undisputed Xxxxxxx letters that seems to explicitly describe rising with Xxxxxx in the present, though it has also been interpreted to refute such a notion, as we 93 Ibid., 159 note 2. 94 Ibid., 162 emphasis in original. have seen. The challenge for interpreters is to show that Romans 6.1–14 does in fact describe or imply inaugurated resurrection. However, we have also noted above that scholarship is at something of an exegetical impasse on the issue, with some confidently proclaiming that Romans 6 does imply present resurrection and others claiming with equal confidence that it clearly does not. Fresh exegesis is clearly required, but we cannot simply rehash the arguments of previous scholars.
Moving Forward. The Parties agree in principle to move forward to: establish a Cooperative System reflecting the principles set out in this Agreement; use their best efforts to cause their respective legislatures to enact or approve the legislation, legislative amendments or regulations necessary to implement the Cooperative System; and enter into all agreements and take all actions necessary to give effect to this Agreement.
Moving Forward. As part of the Lancashire Growth Deal, the LEP will review and strengthen supporting resources for the LEP, in relation to improving local authority partnership arrangements to deliver LEP priorities, including the pooling and aligning of resources across all of Lancashire's local authorities.
Moving Forward. EU-JORDAN TRADE AGREEMENT AS PART OF THE JORDAN COMPACT
Moving Forward. Gaps and Future Research
Moving Forward. In Alberta, the journey to a competitive wholesale electricity market is unfolding positively. Indicators of success include the number and diversity of players, both in generation and as market participants. As of June 2003 there were approximately 240 participants, including small and independent power producers, retailers, self-retailers, marketers and consumers in fields as diverse as forestry, education, manufacturing and health care. “The AESO’s role has been clarified by the new Act, and their new mandate definitely offers opportunities for efficiency and improve- ment,” says Xxxx Xxxxx. “Still, there are lots of issues on the AESO’s plate, in particular a dynamic debate about transmission expansion. It's going to be something of a baptism by fire, but they have good people in place, and a strong Board.” Creating a competitive market is a complex and unpredictable process, but the mid-course review that created the AESO holds tremendous potential. “Alberta is in the global forefront,” says Tapics, “and I think we are one of the leaders in terms of facilitating innovative solutions, both on the technical and market sides of the business.” “As Canada’s first competitive, customer-focused exchange for electric- ity, we take a leadership role in planning and operating Alberta’s electricity system safely, reliably, and at a reasonable cost,” Tapics con- cludes. “Our aim is to strike a balance between the diverse interests of customers, stakeholders and market participants. We are not going to build transmission lines, or implement market enhancements, before we have listened and discussed our plans with customers, stakeholders, and the public (see sidebars on next page).” In 1970, he joined the Shawinigan Engineering Company, Montreal Quebec where his early experience consisted of work on the Xxxxxx River HVDC transmission system in Mani- toba. This was followed by experience on 400/ 500 kV transmission systems in Iran and Pakistan. During this time, he gained industrial experience in pulp and paper xxxxx in Ontario, Newfoundland and the former Yugoslavia. His utility background consisted of employment with SaskPower in increas- ingly responsible positions from 1979 to 1995. From 1995 to 1998, he was self-employed as a consulting engineer. He is Prin- cipal Engineer with the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO). He has been associated with the deregulated electric industry in Alberta since 1997. Xxxx is a registered professional engineer in the provin...
Moving Forward. In this final chapter, we will return to the initial question regarding the legality of the Apprentice agreement, and by extension, confidentiality agreement in general. Before we discuss the implication of our analysis, let me briefly summarize our conclusions thus far. In the first chapter on the current law’s status, we have concluded that it is highly unlikely for a court to rule in favor of disclosing the Apprentice outtakes based on existing law. After having examined the current law’s status, we turned to the normative question of whether non-disclosure is indeed what the court should do. To answer this question, we have applied three social political theories to the Xxxxx Tape case.
