Common use of Necessary Study Agreement Clause in Contracts

Necessary Study Agreement. A Project Developer that has entered into a GIA that plans to undertake modifications pursuant to that GIA to its Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall be required to enter into a Necessary Study Agreement with Transmission Provider in the form set forth in Tariff, Part IX, Subpart G. The Necessary Study Agreement provides the terms, conditions, Study Deposit, and cost responsibility for Project Developer to pay Transmission Provider’s actual costs to perform the Necessary Study(ies) to determine: (a) the type and scope of the permanent material impact, if any, the change will have on the Transmission System; (b) the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change; and (c) a good faith estimate of the cost of the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change. A. Site Control Evidentiary Requirements Site Control is evidence provided by the Project Developer to Transmission Provider in relation to Project Developer’s New Service Request demonstrating Project Developer’s interest in and control over one or more parcels of land for the purpose of constructing a Generating Facility, Merchant Transmission Facilities, Interconnection Facilities, and, if applicable, the Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades at the Point of Interconnection. Specific Site Control phase requirements are set forth in the following Tariff, Part VII, Subpart C, section 306, and Subpart D, sections 309 and 312. 1. Site Control consistent with the requirements herein is required for a project to have a valid position within a Cycle. 2. Proof of Site Control can be in the form of one of the following: (1) deed; (2) lease; (3) option to lease or purchase; or (4) as deemed acceptable by the Transmission Provider, any other contractual or legal right to possess, occupy and control one or more parcels of land. a. Memorandums are not acceptable. b. Documentation solely evidencing an intent to purchase or control land is not acceptable. c. Rights of Way are only acceptable for Project Developer Interconnection Facilities up to the Point of Interconnection. 3. Demonstration of Site Control must include verification, to PJM’s satisfaction, that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility, as set forth in the PJM Manuals. a. The Project Developer must submit a Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Plan map and data files acceptable to PJM demonstrating the arrangement of the resource-specific proposed facilities for the amount of MW requested. b. Any GIS Site Plan map and data files submitted in accordance with this section must be consistent with all other modeling data submitted in connection with Project Developer’s New Service Request. c. In the event of a disagreement between the Transmission Provider and the Project Developer, Transmission Provider will accept a Professional Engineer (PE) stamped site plan drawing (licensed in the state of the facility location) that depicts the proposed generation arrangement and specified the Maximum Facility Output for that arrangement. i. Failure to verify to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall result in the New Service Request being deemed terminated and withdrawn. 4. Site Control must be in the name of the Project Developer identified on the corresponding New Service Request. Otherwise, the Project Developer must demonstrate to PJM’s satisfaction the relationship between the owner with Site Control and the Project Developer identified on the New Service Request. 5. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control that utilizes the same land for multiple New Service Requests unless the total acreage amount of such land is adequate to support all such New Service Requests. a. To the extent that multiple New Service Requests are submitted by a Project Developer using the same Site Control evidence and the total acreage amount of such land is not adequate to support all such New Service Requests, all such New Service Requests shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. b. To the extent that a Project Developer submits a New Service Request with Site Control evidence utilizing land that is also the subject of Site Control in New Service Requests submitted by other Project Developer’s, such Project Developer shall include with its New Service Request evidence, to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction, demonstrating that the project referenced in the Project Developer’s New Service Request is concurrently feasible with the development of any other projects that will share the land identified in the Site Control. Such proof of concurrent feasibility shall include: i. Identification of any other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the land identified in the Site Control; and ii. Identification of the proposed location and space utilization of all projects that will share the land, including acreage and boundaries for all projects sharing the land identified in the Site Control; and iii. Any related technical information required by the Transmission Provider to enable the Transmission Provider to determine that development of the project referenced in the submitted New Service Request is not inconsistent with development of any of the other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the same land. 6. Multiple projects may share Project Developer Interconnection Facilities. A shared facilities agreement is required if jointly owned common Interconnection Facilities are proposed. 7. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnect request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system. To the extent that Project Developers submit evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnection request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system, the relevant New Service Request submitted to Transmission Provider shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn.

Necessary Study Agreement. A Project Developer that has entered into a GIA that plans to undertake modifications pursuant to that GIA to its Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall be required to enter into a Necessary Study Agreement with Transmission Provider in the form set forth in Tariff, Part IX, Subpart G. The Necessary Study Agreement provides the terms, conditions, Study Depositstudy deposit, and cost responsibility for Project Developer to pay Transmission Provider’s actual costs to perform the Necessary Study(ies) to determine: (a) the type and scope of the permanent material impact, if any, the change will have on the Transmission System; (b) the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change; and (c) a good faith estimate of the cost of the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change. A. . Tariff, Part VII, Subpart A.3, section 302 Site Control Evidentiary Requirements Site Control is evidence provided by the Project Developer to Transmission Provider in relation to Project Developer’s New Service Request demonstrating Project Developer’s interest in and control over one or more parcels of land for the purpose of constructing a Generating Facility, Merchant Transmission Facilities, Interconnection Facilities, and, if applicable, the Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades at the Point of Interconnection. Specific Site Control phase requirements are set forth in the following Tariff, Part VII, Subpart CApplication Phase, section 306, Decision Point I and Subpart D, sections 309 and 312. 1Decision Point III sections. 1a. Site Control consistent with the requirements herein is required for a project to have a valid position within a Cycle. 2. 2b. Proof of Site Control can be in the form of one of the following: (1) deed; (2) lease; (3) option to lease or purchase; or (4) as deemed acceptable by the Transmission Provider, any other contractual or legal right to possess, occupy and control one or more parcels of land. a. . ai. Memorandums are not acceptable. b. . bii. Documentation solely evidencing an intent to purchase or control land is not acceptable. c. . ciii. Rights of Way are only acceptable for Project Developer Interconnection Facilities up to the Point of Interconnection. 3. Demonstration of Site Control must include verification, to PJM’s satisfaction, that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility, as set forth in the PJM Manuals. a. The Project Developer must submit a Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Plan map and data files acceptable to PJM demonstrating the arrangement of the resource-specific proposed facilities for the amount of MW requested. b. Any GIS Site Plan map and data files submitted in accordance with this section must be consistent with all other modeling data submitted in connection with Project Developer’s New Service Request. c. In the event of a disagreement between the Transmission Provider and the Project Developer, Transmission Provider will accept a Professional Engineer (PE) stamped site plan drawing (licensed in the state of the facility location) that depicts the proposed generation arrangement and specified the Maximum Facility Output for that arrangement. i. Failure to verify to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall result in the New Service Request being deemed terminated and withdrawn. 4. Site Control must be in the name of the Project Developer identified on the corresponding New Service Request. Otherwise, the Project Developer must demonstrate to PJM’s satisfaction the relationship between the owner with Site Control and the Project Developer identified on the New Service Request. 5. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control that utilizes the same land for multiple New Service Requests unless the total acreage amount of such land is adequate to support all such New Service Requests. a. To the extent that multiple New Service Requests are submitted by a Project Developer using the same Site Control evidence and the total acreage amount of such land is not adequate to support all such New Service Requests, all such New Service Requests shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. b. To the extent that a Project Developer submits a New Service Request with Site Control evidence utilizing land that is also the subject of Site Control in New Service Requests submitted by other Project Developer’s, such Project Developer shall include with its New Service Request evidence, to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction, demonstrating that the project referenced in the Project Developer’s New Service Request is concurrently feasible with the development of any other projects that will share the land identified in the Site Control. Such proof of concurrent feasibility shall include: i. Identification of any other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the land identified in the Site Control; and ii. Identification of the proposed location and space utilization of all projects that will share the land, including acreage and boundaries for all projects sharing the land identified in the Site Control; and iii. Any related technical information required by the Transmission Provider to enable the Transmission Provider to determine that development of the project referenced in the submitted New Service Request is not inconsistent with development of any of the other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the same land. 6. Multiple projects may share Project Developer Interconnection Facilities. A shared facilities agreement is required if jointly owned common Interconnection Facilities are proposed. 7. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnect request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system. To the extent that Project Developers submit evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnection request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system, the relevant New Service Request submitted to Transmission Provider shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn.

Necessary Study Agreement. A Project Developer that has entered into a GIA that plans to undertake modifications pursuant to that GIA to its Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall be required to enter into a Necessary Study Agreement with Transmission Provider in the form set forth in Tariff, Part IX, Subpart G. The Necessary Study Agreement provides the terms, conditions, Study Depositstudy deposit, and cost responsibility for Project Developer to pay Transmission Provider’s actual costs to perform the Necessary Study(ies) to determine: (a) the type and scope of the permanent material impact, if any, the change will have on the Transmission System; (b) the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change; and (c) a good faith estimate of the cost of the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change. A. Site Control Evidentiary Requirements Site Control is evidence provided by the Project Developer to Transmission Provider in relation to Project Developer’s New Service Request demonstrating Project Developer’s interest in and control over one or more parcels of land for the purpose of constructing a Generating Facility, Merchant Transmission Facilities, Interconnection Facilities, and, if applicable, the Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades at the Point of Interconnection. Specific Site Control phase requirements are set forth in the following Tariff, Part VIIVIII, Subpart CApplication Phase, section 306, Decision Point I and Subpart D, sections 309 and 312Decision Point III sections. 1. Site Control consistent with the requirements herein is required for a project to have a valid position within a Cycle. 2. Proof of Site Control can be in the form of one of the following: (1) deed; (2) lease; (3) option to lease or purchase; or (4) as deemed acceptable by the Transmission Provider, any other contractual or legal right to possess, occupy and control one or more parcels of land. a. Memorandums are not acceptable. b. Documentation solely evidencing an intent to purchase or control land is not acceptable. c. Rights of Way are only acceptable for Project Developer Interconnection Facilities up to the Point of Interconnection. 3. Demonstration of Site Control must include verification, to PJM’s satisfaction, that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility, as set forth in the PJM Manuals. a. The Project Developer must submit a Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Plan map and data files acceptable to PJM demonstrating the arrangement of the resource-specific proposed facilities for the amount of MW requested. b. Any GIS Site Plan map and data files submitted in accordance with this section must be consistent with all other modeling data submitted in connection with Project Developer’s New Service Request. c. In the event of a disagreement between the Transmission Provider and the Project Developer, Transmission Provider will accept a Professional Engineer (PE) stamped site plan drawing (licensed in the state of the facility location) that depicts the proposed generation arrangement and specified the Maximum Facility Output for that arrangement. i. Failure to verify to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall result in the New Service Request being deemed terminated and withdrawn. 4. Site Control must be in the name of the Project Developer identified on the corresponding New Service Request. Otherwise, the Project Developer must demonstrate to PJM’s satisfaction the relationship between the owner with Site Control and the Project Developer identified on the New Service Request. 5. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control that utilizes the same land for multiple New Service Requests unless the total acreage amount of such land is adequate to support all such New Service Requests. a. To the extent that multiple New Service Requests are submitted by a Project Developer using the same Site Control evidence and the total acreage amount of such land is not adequate to support all such New Service Requests, all such New Service Requests shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. b. To the extent that a Project Developer submits a New Service Request with Site Control evidence utilizing land that is also the subject of Site Control in New Service Requests submitted by other Project Developer’s, such Project Developer shall include with its New Service Request evidence, to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction, demonstrating that the project referenced in the Project Developer’s New Service Request is concurrently feasible with the development of any other projects that will share the land identified in the Site Control. Such proof of concurrent feasibility shall include: i. Identification of any other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the land identified in the Site Control; and ii. Identification of the proposed location and space utilization of all projects that will share the land, including acreage and boundaries for all projects sharing the land identified in the Site Control; and iii. Any related technical information required by the Transmission Provider to enable the Transmission Provider to determine that development of the project referenced in the submitted New Service Request is not inconsistent with development of any of the other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the same land. 6. Multiple projects may share Project Developer Interconnection Facilities. A shared facilities agreement is required if jointly owned common Interconnection Facilities are proposed. 7. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnect request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system. To the extent that Project Developers submit evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnection request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system, the relevant New Service Request submitted to Transmission Provider shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn.

Necessary Study Agreement. A Project Developer that has entered into a GIA that plans to undertake modifications pursuant to that GIA to its Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall be required to enter into a Necessary Study Agreement with Transmission Provider in the form set forth in Tariff, Part IX, Subpart G. The Necessary Study Agreement provides the terms, conditions, Study Depositstudy deposit, and cost responsibility for Project Developer to pay Transmission Provider’s actual costs to perform the Necessary Study(ies) to determine: (a) the type and scope of the permanent material impact, if any, the change will have on the Transmission System; (b) the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change; and (c) a good faith estimate of the cost of the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change.. Tariff, Part VII, Subpart A.3, section 302 Site Control A. Site Control Evidentiary Requirements Site Control is evidence provided by the Project Developer to Transmission Provider in relation to Project Developer’s New Service Request demonstrating Project Developer’s interest in and control over one or more parcels of land for the purpose of constructing a Generating Facility, Merchant Transmission Facilities, Interconnection Facilities, and, if applicable, the Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades at the Point of Interconnection. Specific Site Control phase requirements are set forth in the following Tariff, Part VII, Subpart CApplication Phase, section 306, Decision Point I and Subpart D, sections 309 and 312Decision Point III sections. 1. Site Control consistent with the requirements herein is required for a project to have a valid position within a Cycle. 2. Proof of Site Control can be in the form of one of the following: (1) deed; (2) lease; (3) option to lease or purchase; or (4) as deemed acceptable by the Transmission Provider, any other contractual or legal right to possess, occupy and control one or more parcels of land. a. Memorandums are not acceptable. b. Documentation solely evidencing an intent to purchase or control land is not acceptable. c. Rights of Way are only acceptable for Project Developer Interconnection Facilities up to the Point of Interconnection. 3. Demonstration of Site Control must include verification, to PJM’s satisfaction, that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility, as set forth in the PJM Manuals. a. The Project Developer must submit a Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Plan map and data files acceptable to PJM demonstrating the arrangement of the resource-specific proposed facilities for the amount of MW requested. b. Any GIS Site Plan map and data files submitted in accordance with this section must be consistent with all other modeling data submitted in connection with Project Developer’s New Service Request. c. In the event of a disagreement between the Transmission Provider and the Project Developer, Transmission Provider will accept a Professional Engineer (PE) stamped site plan drawing (licensed in the state of the facility location) that depicts the proposed generation arrangement and specified the Maximum Facility Output for that arrangement.the i. Failure to verify to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall result in the New Service Request being deemed terminated and withdrawn. 4. Site Control must be in the name of the Project Developer identified on the corresponding New Service Request. Otherwise, the Project Developer must demonstrate to PJM’s satisfaction the relationship between the owner with Site Control and the Project Developer identified on the New Service Request. 5. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control that utilizes the same land for multiple New Service Requests unless the total acreage amount of such land is adequate to support all such New Service Requests. a. To the extent that multiple New Service Requests are submitted by a Project Developer using the same Site Control evidence and the total acreage amount of such land is not adequate to support all such New Service Requests, all such New Service Requests shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. b. To the extent that a Project Developer submits a New Service Request with Site Control evidence utilizing land that is also the subject of Site Control in New Service Requests submitted by other Project Developer’s, such Project Developer shall include with its New Service Request evidence, to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction, demonstrating that the project referenced in the Project Developer’s New Service Request is concurrently Req feasible with the development of any other projects that will share the land identified in the Site Control. Such proof of concurrent feasibility shall include: i. Identification of any other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the land identified in the Site Control; and ii. Identification of the proposed location and space utilization of all projects that will share the land, including acreage and boundaries for all projects sharing the land identified in the Site Control; and iii. Any related technical information required by the Transmission Provider to enable the Transmission Provider to determine that development of the project referenced in the submitted New Service Request is not inconsistent with development of any of the other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the same land. 6. Multiple projects may share Project Developer Interconnection Facilities. A shared facilities agreement is required if jointly owned common Interconnection Facilities are proposed. 7. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnect request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system. To the extent that Project Developers submit evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnection request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system, the relevant New Service Request submitted to Transmission Provider shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. 8. Site Control must demonstrate three key elements: conveyance, term, and exclusivity: a. Term Term is the minimum duration required to evidence Site Control. The Term requirements vary, and are established in the following Tariff, Part VII rules, at various points within a Cycle. The Term cannot be satisfied by an agreement with an initial term shorter than the requisite required term that has extensions, including unilateral extensions, unless those extensions have been exercised and any requisite conditions fulfilled, including any payment obligations, by the Project Developer at the time evidence of Site Control is provided to the Transmission Provider.

Necessary Study Agreement. A Project Developer that has entered into a GIA that plans to undertake modifications pursuant to that GIA to its Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall be required to enter into a Necessary Study Agreement with Transmission Provider in the form set forth in Tariff, Part IX, Subpart G. The Necessary Study Agreement provides the terms, conditions, Study study depositStudy Deposit, and cost responsibility for Project Developer to pay Transmission Provider’s actual costs to perform the Necessary Study(ies) to determine: : (a) the type and scope of the permanent material impact, if any, the change will have on the Transmission System; (b) the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change; and (c) a good faith estimate of the cost of the additions, modifications, or replacements to the Transmission System required to accommodate the change. . Tariff, Part VII, Subpart A.3, section 302 Site Control A. Site Control Evidentiary Requirements Site Control is evidence provided by the Project Developer to Transmission Provider in relation to Project Developer’s New Service Request demonstrating Project Developer’s interest in and control over one or more parcels of land for the purpose of constructing a Generating Facility, Merchant Transmission Facilities, Interconnection Facilities, and, if applicable, the Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades at the Point of Interconnection. Specific Site Control phase requirements are set forth in the following Tariff, Part VII, Application Phase, Decision Point I and Decision Point III sections.Subpart C, section 306, and Subpart D, sections 309 and 312. 1. Site Control consistent with the requirements herein is required for a project to have a valid position within a Cycle. 2. Proof of Site Control can be in the form of one of the following: (1) deed; (2) lease; (3) option to lease or purchase; or (4) as deemed acceptable by the Transmission Provider, any other contractual or legal right to possess, occupy and control one or more parcels of land. a. iii. a.Memorandums are not acceptable... iv. b. Documentation solely evidencing an intent to purchase or control land is not acceptable. c. Rights of Way are only acceptable for Project Developer Interconnection Facilities up to the Point of Interconnection. 3. Demonstration of Site Control must include verification, to PJM’s satisfaction, that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility, as set forth in the PJM Manuals. a. The Project Developer must submit a Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Plan map and data files acceptable to PJM demonstrating the arrangement of the resource-specific proposed facilities for the amount of MW requested. b. Any GIS Site Plan map and data files submitted in accordance with this section must be consistent with all other modeling data submitted in connection with Project Developer’s New Service Request. c. In the event of a disagreement between the Transmission Provider and the Project Developer, Transmission Provider will accept a Professional Engineer (PE) stamped site plan drawing (licensed in the state of the facility location) that depicts the proposed generation arrangement and specified the Maximum Facility Output for that arrangement. i. Failure to verify to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction that the total acreage of land is adequate for the resource-specific technology and MWs requested for a proposed Generating Facility or Merchant Transmission Facility shall result in the New Service Request being deemed terminated and withdrawn. 4. Site Control must be in the name of the Project Developer identified on the corresponding New Service Request. Otherwise, the Project Developer must demonstrate to PJM’s satisfaction the relationship between the owner with Site Control and the Project Developer identified on the New Service Request. 5. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control that utilizes the same land for multiple New Service Requests unless the total acreage amount of such land is adequate to support all such New Service Requests. a. To the extent that multiple New Service Requests are submitted by a Project Developer using the same Site Control evidence and the total acreage amount of such land is not adequate to support all such New Service Requests, all such New Service Requests shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn. b. To the extent that a Project Developer submits a New Service Request with Site Control evidence utilizing land that is also the subject of Site Control in New Service Requests submitted by other Project Developer’s, such Project Developer shall include with its New Service Request evidence, to Transmission Provider’s satisfaction, demonstrating that the project referenced in the Project Developer’s New Service Request is concurrently feasible with the development of any other projects that will share the land identified in the Site Control. Such proof of concurrent feasibility shall include: i. Identification of any other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the land identified in the Site Control; and ii. Identification of the proposed location and space utilization of all projects that will share the land, including acreage and boundaries for all projects sharing the land identified in the Site Control; and iii. Any related technical information required by the Transmission Provider to enable the Transmission Provider to determine that development of the project referenced in the submitted New Service Request is not inconsistent with development of any of the other New Service Requests that will share all or a portion of the same land. 6. Multiple projects may share Project Developer Interconnection Facilities. A shared facilities agreement is required if jointly owned common Interconnection Facilities are proposed. 7. Project Developers are prohibited from submitting evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnect request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system. To the extent that Project Developers submit evidence of Site Control for land which is also the subject of an interconnection request submitted in an adjacent Regional Transmission Organization, Independent System Operator, or other system, the relevant New Service Request submitted to Transmission Provider shall be deemed terminated and withdrawn...