Newfoundland and Labrador. Civic Holiday (St. John's Regatta Day in locality)
Newfoundland and Labrador. Pension Benefits Act, 1997, S.N.L. 1996, c. P-4.01.
Newfoundland and Labrador. In the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, in the period to contract termination, the Company may contract out work to meet the demands of the business. The following cities are defined as Major Metropolitan areas: Aldergrove, XX Xxxxxxxx, ON Burnaby, BC Kitchener, ON Greater Vancouver, BC London, ON Kamloops, XX Xxxxxxx, ON Victoria, BC Xxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxx, XX Sudbury, ON Edmonton, AB Greater Montreal, QC Winnipeg, MB Xxxxxx Xxxx, XX Xxxxxxxx, XX St. Laurent, QC Etobicoke, ON Halifax, NS Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX Moncton, NB In the period to contract termination the Company will endeavor to only consider contracting out in remote areas where it is economically feasible provided that said areas are unmanned or where a natural vacancy occurs through attrition. Where the Company is considering contracting out in remote areas that are currently manned, the Company and the Union will meet to discuss the impact and mutually agreed on how to proceed. Any layoff notices issued as a result of the above noted policy will be considered a T.O.O. layoff and all applicable articles of the Collective Agreement and Job Security Agreement that deal with T.O.O. will apply: • The Company agrees to offer Early Retirement Separation Allowance/Voluntary Severance Allowance packages to affected employees. • If there are vacancies elsewhere in the Company, these employees will have the option of bidding on the vacancies. • The Company will, upon the employee’s request and with Union agreement, rebalance his position to a major metropolitan area within his District. • An employee affected by such a layoff will have the option, if unable to maintain a job within his JSET, of accepting the layoff with full JSA benefits and recall rights. These layoff provisions will also apply to any employees within Newfoundland and Labrador that may be affected by contracting out in their area.
Newfoundland and Labrador. In February 2011, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the General Trial Division of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation passed in Newfoundland in 2001 and proclaimed in February 2011, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Newfoundland government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Newfoundland court. A decision is pending. • Quebec—In June 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Quebec, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, District of Montreal. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation enacted in Quebec in 2009, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Quebec government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial actions described above based on analogous theories of liability. RJR Tobacco and its affiliate have brought a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Quebec court, which was dismissed on July 4, 2013. An application to appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal has been filed. Separately, in August 2009, certain Canadian manufacturers filed a constitutional challenge to the Quebec statute, and that challenge is pending. • Manitoba—In May 2012, a case was filed on behalf of the Province of Manitoba, Canada, against Canadian and non-Canadian tobacco-related entities, including RJR Tobacco and one of its affiliates, in the Court of Queen’s Bench, Winnipeg Judicial Centre, Manitoba. The claim is brought pursuant to legislation assented to in 2006 and proclaimed in 2012, which legislation is substantially similar to the revised British Columbia statute described above. In this action, the Manitoba government seeks to recover essentially the same types of damages that are being sought in the British Columbia and other provincial action...
Newfoundland and Labrador. All Departments of the Province.
Newfoundland and Labrador. Hydro 20
Newfoundland and Labrador. Tender Description Awarded Amount 400433006 Tender Description Awarded Amount 400952003 Tender Description Awarded Amount 400964001 Tender Description Awarded Amount 411405005 Tender Description Awarded Amount
Newfoundland and Labrador. In connection with the purchase of the Shares, the Subscriber hereby represents, warrants, covenants and certifies that the Subscriber is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of NI 45-106, by virtue of satisfying one of the following criteria (YOU MUST ALSO INITIAL OR PLACE A CHECK-XXXX ON THE APPROPRIATE LINE BELOW):
Newfoundland and Labrador. It is understood and agreed by the parties to this letter, that all work performed by the companies who’s signatures are affixed thereto shall be governed by the Quality Control Council agreement and the terms and conditions of the appendix for the above captioned Provinces. 0 - 1000 hours 15.07 15.52 16.07 16.71 1000 - 2500 hours 18.59 19.15 19.82 20.61 2500 - 4000 hours 23.52 24.22 25.07 26.07 4000 - 6000 hours 25.03 25.78 26.68 27.75 Thereafter Training: 31.11 32.04 33.16 34.49 The parties further agree that when the trade of Heat Treating Technician is designated and the criterion for certification is in place the parties will meet and amend the agreement accordingly. The parties agree that some technicians may require additional on the job training in order to have confidence and proficiency as a level II or in advanced specialty methods of inspection. In an effort to make that additional training available to the Technicians the parties agree to implement a “Voluntary Mentoring Program”. All technicians will be provided fair and reasonable access to the mentoring program. Technicians interested in improving their advanced practical skills may request that their employer provide them with additional training through the mentoring program. Technician must sign “Mentoring Agreement” recording, the inspection method, the individuals CGSB qualifications, the length of the training period and the rate of pay. A copy of the agreement must be provided to the QCC regional office for authorization and registration. Technicians registered in the Mentoring program participating in on the job training must be under the constant and immediate supervision of the designated Mentor to which they have been assigned. No mentor may train more than one technician at a time. The technician will receive 80% of the rate to which the employee would otherwise be entitled for the time spent in the registered mentoring program. This voluntary program can be cancelled upon either party providing 30 day written notice and unless both parties agree to renew or extend expires April 30, 2011. For the QCCC For the NDTMA • All shifts worked offshore from 1 to 21 days will be paid at ST for the first twelve
Newfoundland and Labrador. Miawpukek
