Operator Services Call Processing Sample Clauses

Operator Services Call Processing. AT&T will provide OS to CARRIER’s End Users where technically feasible and available to AT&T-21STATE retail End Users served, in accordance with OS methods and practices that are in effect at the time the CARRIER’s LWC End User makes an OS call. Whether manual or automated, AT&T-21STATE will provide the following services when originating a 0+ or 0- call from a LWCAL, regardless of whether 1-411-dialed DA usage is also requested from that LWCAL:
Operator Services Call Processing. Whether manual or automated, AT&T will provide the following services on behalf of the ILEC when processing a 0-dialed call from an ILECs end user’s line, regardless of whether Directory Assistance is also requested:
Operator Services Call Processing. 3.4.2.1 AT&T-21STATE will provide OS to CLEC’s end users where technically feasible and/or available to AT&T-21STATE retail End Users served, in accordance with OS methods and practices that are in effect at the time the CLEC’s End User makes an OS call. AT&T-21STATE will provide the following OS services to CLEC End Users:
Operator Services Call Processing. Whether manual or automated, AT&T-13STATE will provide the following services when originating a 0+ or 0- call from a LWCAL, regardless of whether 1-411-dialed DA usage is also requested from that LWCAL:
Operator Services Call Processing. Whether manual or automated, AT&T-13STATE will provide the following services when processing a 0-dialed call from CLEC’s line, regardless of whether Directory Assistance is also requested:
Operator Services Call Processing. AT&T will provide OS to ILEC end users where available and technically feasible to AT&T retail end users served in accordance with OS methods and practices that are in effect at the time the ILEC end user makes an OS call.

Related to Operator Services Call Processing

  • Sub-processing 11.1 The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the sub-processor which imposes the same obligations on the sub- processor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the sub-processor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the sub-processor’s obligations under such agreement. 11.2 The prior written contract between the data importer and the sub-processor shall also provide for a third-party beneficiary clause as laid down in Clause 3 for cases where the data subject is not able to bring the claim for compensation referred to in paragraph 1 of Clause 6 against the data exporter or the data importer because they have factually disappeared or have ceased to exist in law or have become insolvent and no successor entity has assumed the entire legal obligations of the data exporter or data importer by contract or by operation of law. Such third-party liability of the sub-processor shall be limited to its own processing operations under the Clauses. 11.3 The provisions relating to data protection aspects for sub-processing of the contract referred to in paragraph 1 shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the data exporter is established, namely ........................................ 11.4 The data exporter shall keep a list of sub-processing agreements concluded under the Clauses and notified by the data importer pursuant to Clause 5(j), which shall be updated at least once a year. The list shall be available to the data exporter’s data protection supervisory authority.