Common use of Opinion of Counsel Concerning Organization and Loan Documents Clause in Contracts

Opinion of Counsel Concerning Organization and Loan Documents. Each of the Lenders and the Administrative Agent shall have received favorable opinions addressed to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent from (a) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx LLP, as counsel to the Borrower, the Subsidiary Guarantors, MCRC and their respective Subsidiaries, with respect to New York and New Jersey law and certain matters of Delaware law, (b) Ballard, Spahr, Xxxxxxx and Ingersoll, as counsel to MCRC, with respect to Maryland and District of Columbia law, (c) Xxxxxxx & Xxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Connecticut law, (d) XxXxxxxxxx, Keen & Xxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Pennsylvania law, (e) Xxxxx, Day, Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Texas and California law, and (f) Sallquist & Xxxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Arizona law.

Opinion of Counsel Concerning Organization and Loan Documents. Each of the Lenders and the Administrative Agent shall have received favorable opinions addressed to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent from (a) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Pxxxx Cxxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx Fxxxx LLP, as counsel to the Borrower, the Subsidiary Guarantors, MCRC and their respective Subsidiaries, with respect to New York and New Jersey law and certain matters of Delaware law, (b) Ballard, Spahr, Bxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx and Ingersoll, LLP, as corporate counsel to MCRC, with respect to Maryland and District of Columbia law, (c) Xxxxxxx Wxxxxx & XxxxDxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Connecticut law, (d) XxXxxxxxxxMxXxxxxxxx, Keen & XxxxxxxBxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Pennsylvania law, and (e) XxxxxJxxxx, Day, Xxxxxx Rxxxxx & XxxxxPxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Texas and California law, and (f) Sallquist & Xxxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Arizona law.

Opinion of Counsel Concerning Organization and Loan Documents. Each of the Lenders and the Administrative Agent shall have received favorable opinions addressed to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent from (a) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Pryor, Cashman, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx LLPXxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower, and the Subsidiary Guarantors, Guarantors MCRC and their respective Subsidiaries, Subsidiaries with respect to New York and New Jersey law and certain matters of Delaware law, (b) Ballard, Spahr, Xxxxxxx and Ingersoll, as counsel to MCRC, with respect to Maryland and District of Columbia law, (c) Xxxxxxx Xxxx & XxxxXxxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Connecticut law, (d) XxXxxxxxxx, Keen Eckell Sparks Levy Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx & XxxxxxxXxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Pennsylvania law, (e) Xxxxx, Day, Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Texas and California law, and (f) Sallquist Gunster, Yoakley, Xxxxxx-Xxxxx & XxxxxxxxXxxxxxx P.A., as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Arizona Florida law, and (g) Battle Xxxxxx LLP as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to California law.

Opinion of Counsel Concerning Organization and Loan Documents. Each of the Lenders and the Administrative Agent shall have received favorable opinions addressed to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Lenders and the Administrative Agent from (a) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx LLP, as counsel to the Borrower, the Subsidiary Guarantors, MCRC and their respective Subsidiaries, with respect to New York and New Jersey law and certain matters of Delaware law, (b) Ballard, Spahr, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx and Ingersoll, LLP, as corporate counsel to MCRC, with respect to Maryland and District of Columbia law, (c) Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Connecticut law, (d) XxXxxxxxxx, Keen & Xxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Pennsylvania law, and (e) Xxxxx, Day, Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Texas and California law, and (f) Sallquist & Xxxxxxxx, as counsel to the Borrower and the Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to Arizona law.