Other Outcomes. If the aggregate number of Cash Election Shares is equal to or less than the Cash Number and the aggregate number of Stock Election Shares is equal to or less than Stock number, then all Stock Election Shares shall be converted into the right to receive Parent Common Stock, all Cash Election Shares shall be converted into the right to receive cash and all Non-Election Shares (if any) shall be converted into the right to receive Parent Common Stock or the right to receive cash in the following manner:
(i) the Exchange Agent will select from among the holders of Non-Election Shares, on a pro rata basis, a sufficient number of such shares (“Stock Exchanged Shares”) such that the number of Stock Exchanged Shares will, when added to the number of Stock Election Shares, be equal as closely as practicable to the Stock Number, and all such Stock Exchanged Shares shall be converted into the right to receive Parent Common Stock; and
(ii) the Non-Election Shares not so selected as Stock Exchanged Shares shall be converted into the right to receive cash.
Other Outcomes. 20
2.1 Services to assist homeless people with mental health issues 20 to secure or maintain stable accommodation.
2.2 Support to assist young people aged 12-18 years. 22
2.3 Improvements in service coordination and provision. 24
2.4 Support to women and children experiencing domestic. 27 violence and family violence to stay in their housing.
Other Outcomes. If HACKERS AT UPC is unable to determine that cheating did not occur based on publicly available resources, organizers will then communicate with the alleged cheater. Informing them of what has been reported about them. Allow the alleged cheater to give their side of the story to the staff. After this point, if the report stands, let the alleged cheater know what actions will be taken against them. The following actions will be considered: Depending on the cheating allegation, HACKERS AT UPC may decide to make one or more public announcements. If necessary, this will be done with a short announcement. No one other than CopenHacks directors should make any announcements. If some attendees were angered by the cheating, it is best to apologize to them that the cheating occurred to begin with.
Other Outcomes. COFTS Survey results are being used and integrated into multiple school food and FTS efforts, including in the ARRA-funded School Food Primer and school food procurement report, FTS Task Force efforts, and more. XXXXX has maintained consistent and frequent contact with all six district partners and their community partners, providing on-going links to new funding opportunities and other resources vie email and phone. The COFTS website has also been developed as the go-to site for FTS resources. To support these efforts, COFTS developed a comprehensive inventory of districts, producers, and other stakeholders interested in FTS by region of the state. In response to multiple requests for peer learning and sharing of best practices, Colorado FTS brought on two interns (one to conduct interviews and one to write up the case studies) and hired a professional graphic designer to develop a series of FTS case studies that address some of the most critical issues of FTS, including food safety, establishing contracts, developing schools gardens, and more. Each case study included an interview of a school district partner as well as extensive lists of best practices and other resources from across Colorado and the country. These case studies were then placed on the COFTS website, emailed to all school districts, shared through many e-newsletters, and disseminated nationally through national listservs and National Farm to School. CO FTS has provided TA for local schools and local producers to participate in various local food awareness events such as Colorado Proud Day and Apples Days in southwestern Colorado. This has resulted in new FTS contracts between school and producers. For example Xxxxxxx and Durango schools made first time purchase of apples from Chimney Rock Farms in Pagosa Springs. Specific products developed towards this task in year one included: • FTS Contacts & Stakeholders • COFTS website development • Completion of 7 farm to school case studies • Provide technical assistance for sites (example, Colorado Proud School Meal Day at Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx, Local Apple Days in Southwestern Colorado) • On-going sharing of funding, resources, and other tools Based on these activities, primary conclusions include: • A primary challenge to consistent and efficient communication with partners has been the season, in that summer is not the optimal time to engage either districts or producers. On October 13, 2010, Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx 6 school district in partnership with Far...
Other Outcomes. The Local Government and the Jagera, Yuggera and Ugarapul People agree on a range of other things to help them meet mutual aspirations, benefit the local community and ensure ongoing communication between the Parties. Details are recorded in this Part. To help the Parties understand and implement the Agreement, this document uses plain language. Because it is also a legal document, the meanings of words and phrases in the Agreement need to be very clear. Some words and phrases are shown in italics and their meanings are contained in Schedule 1. Upon its registration by the National Native Title Tribunal, this Agreement will constitute an "area agreement" indigenous land use agreement under the Native Title Act. It has been entered into between the Parties before the Native Title Claim is finalised. The Local Government will support the Jagera, Xxxxxxx and Ugarapul People, in the way described in the Agreement, in seeking an outcome to the Native Title Claim which recognises Native Title. There are several ways in which the Native Title Claim could be finalised. The Agreement provides for all possibilities in the following ways:- First Possibility - The Federal Court of Australia might make a final order by consent of all the required parties to the Native Title Claim recognising that Native Title exists. In that event Part 2 will cease to apply, but Part 1, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5 will continue to apply indefinitely. Second Possibility - The Native Title Claim may proceed to a final contested hearing and the Federal Court of Australia will make a final order in relation to the Native Title Claim. In that event, Part 2 will cease to apply, upon an Unsuccessful Determination Part 3 will cease to apply, but Part 1, Part 4 and Part 5 will continue to apply unless another native title claim is entered in the Register of Claims over the ILUA Area. Third Possibility - Before or after the Native Title Claim is decided by order of the Federal Court of Australia, the Native Title Party might surrender any Native Title within the ILUA Area to the State of Queensland. In that event Part 2 and Part 3 would cease to apply but Part 1, Part 4 and Part 5 would continue to apply indefinitely. Fourth Possibility - Before the Native Title Claim is finally decided by the Federal Court of Australia, it might be discontinued by the Native Title Party, or struck out or dismissed by order of the Court. In that event Part 2 will cease to apply but Part 1, Part 3, Part 4 and Part ...
Other Outcomes. Introduction - Other Parts of this Agreement contain outcomes on technical aspects of Native Title and Aboriginal Cultural Heritage. However the Parties believe that, by working together, they can achieve additional, practical outcomes on issues which affect the lives and values of the Jagera, Yuggera and Ugarapul People and the local community. In negotiating agreed outcomes to the Native Title Claim, the Native Title Act recognises that the Agreement "may involve matters other than Native Title".15 This Part contains the agreed commitment of the Parties to develop and implement policies and programs relating both to the Jagera, Yuggera and Ugarapul People and the wider community in Ipswich City. It also contains arrangements for ongoing communication between the Jagera, Yuggera and Ugarapul People and the Local Government.
