Patent Liaisons Sample Clauses

Patent Liaisons. Promptly after the Effective Date, each Party shall appoint an individual to act as a patent liaison for such Party (each, a “Patent Liaison”). The Patent Liaisons shall be the primary point of contact for the Parties regarding intellectual property-related activities and matters contemplated by this Agreement, as and to the extent requested by Celgene from time to time. The name and contact information for each Party’s Patent Liaison, as well as any replacement(s) chosen by such Party, in its sole discretion, from time to time, shall be promptly provided to the other Party in accordance with Section 11.2.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Liaisons. Prior to the end of the Phase 1 Option Term for the Licensed Program, the Patent Committee under the Master Collaboration Agreement shall remain established, and shall continue to perform the functions set forth in Section 4.3 and Article 7 of the Master Collaboration Agreement with respect to the Prothena Licensed Collaboration Patents and Licensed Program Patents. Following the end of the Phase 1 Option Term for the Licensed Program, the Patent Committee under the Master Collaboration Agreement shall no longer oversee or review any matters with respect to the Prothena Licensed Collaboration Patents or Licensed Program Patents, and promptly following the end of the Phase 1 Option Term for the Licensed Program, each Party shall appoint an individual to act as a patent liaison for such Party pursuant to this Agreement (each, a “Patent Liaison”). The Patent Liaisons shall be the primary point of contact for the Parties regarding intellectual property-related activities and matters contemplated by this Agreement, as and to the extent requested by Celgene from time to time. The name and contact information for each Party’s Patent Liaison, as well as any replacement(s) chosen by such Party, in its sole discretion, from time to time, shall be promptly provided to the other Party in accordance with Section 11.2. [***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
Patent Liaisons. Promptly after the Effective Date, each Party shall appoint an individual to act as a patent liaison for such Party, which may be one of the representatives of such Party on the Patent Committee (each, a “Patent Liaison”). The Patent Liaisons shall be the primary point of contact for the Parties regarding intellectual property-related activities and matters contemplated by this Agreement and shall facilitate all such activities and matters hereunder. The Patent Liaisons shall attend all meetings of the Patent Committee and shall be responsible for assisting the Patent Committee in performing its oversight responsibilities. The name and contact information for each Party’s Patent Liaison, as well as any replacement(s) chosen by such Party, in its sole discretion, from time to time, shall be promptly provided to the other Party in accordance with Section 12.2.
Patent Liaisons. Promptly (but no later than [**] days) after the Effective Date, the Parties shall each designate representative(s) to consult with the other Party’s representative(s) with respect to Patent prosecution and enforcement matters (the “Patent Liaisons”) as more fully described in this Section 4.4. The Patent Liaisons shall discuss, at such times, places and frequencies as either Patent Liaison determines is necessary, material issues and provide input to each other regarding the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of Collaboration IP, EPIZYME IP, EPIZYME Diagnostic IP, GSK IP and Joint IP. The Patent Liaisons shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of each Party’s strategies for the protection of the foregoing intellectual property rights related to Licensed Compounds and EPIZYME Compounds, as applicable; provided, that such strategy for both Parties shall require the filing and prosecution of [**] with respect to [**] reasonably possible, with the [**] (the foregoing referred to herein as the “Patent Strategy”). All final decisions related to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of any Collaboration IP, EPIZYME IP, EPIZYME Diagnostic IP, GSK IP and Joint IP shall be made by the Party with the right to control such prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense, as applicable, as set forth in Article 8.
Patent Liaisons. Promptly following and in no event later than [***] after the Effective Date, the Parties shall each designate representative(s) to consult with the other Party’s representative(s) with respect to Patent prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense matters (the “Patent Liaisons”) as more fully described in this Section 3.6. The Patent Liaisons shall discuss, at such times, places and frequencies as either Patent Liaison determines is necessary, material issues and provide input to each other regarding determination of inventorship of Know-How hereunder, and the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of Patents comprising [***] as more fully described in Article 8. All final decisions related to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of any Patents comprising [***] shall be made by the Party with the right to control such prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense, as applicable, as set forth in Article 8.
Patent Liaisons. Promptly (but in no event later than [**]) following the Effective Date, the Parties shall each designate a representative to consult with the other Party’s representative with respect to the Prosecution of the Licensed Patent Rights, Hutchmed Patent Rights, and Joint Combination Therapy Patent Rights (such representatives, the “Patent Liaisons”). The Patent Liaisons shall discuss and provide input to each other, at such times, places and frequencies as mutually agreed, on all material issues with respect to the Prosecution of such Patent Rights; provided that all final decisions related to the Prosecution, enforcement or defense of the Licensed Patent Rights, Hutchmed Patent Rights, and Joint Combination Therapy Patent Rights shall be made by the Party with the right to control such Prosecution, enforcement or defense, as applicable as set forth in this Article 11.
Patent Liaisons. No later than [***] after the Effective Date, the Parties shall each designate representative(s) to consult with the other Party’s representative(s) with respect to Patent prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense matters (the “Patent Liaisons”) as more fully described in this Section 7.9 (Patent Liaisons). The Patent Liaisons shall discuss, at such times, places and frequencies as either Patent Liaison determines is necessary, material issues and provide input to each other regarding determination of inventorship of Know-How hereunder, and the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of Patents included in the ITEOS Technology, Joint Arising Technology, or GSK Arising Technology as more fully described in Article 11 (Intellectual Property). All final decisions related to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of any Patents included in the ITEOS Technology, Joint Arising Technology or GSK Technology shall be made by the Party with the right to control such prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense, as applicable, as set forth in Article 11 (Intellectual Property) and subject to the terms and conditions therein.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Liaisons. No later than [**] following the Effective Date, the Parties shall each designate representative(s) to consult with the other Party’s representative(s) with respect to Patent prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense matters (the “Patent Liaisons”) as more fully described in this Section 10.10 (Patent Liaisons). The Patent Liaisons shall discuss, at such times, places and frequencies as either Patent Liaison determines is necessary, material issues and provide input to each other regarding determination of whether any given Know-How or Patent qualifies as Platform-Specific Arising Know-How, a Platform-Specific Arising Patent, Product-Specific Arising Know-How, a Product-Specific Arising Patent, GSK Arising Technology, Mersana Arising Technology or Joint Arising Technology, and the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of Patents included in the GSK Prosecuted Patents, Mersana Product-Related Patents or Joint Arising Technology, as more fully described in Article 13 (Intellectual Property). In addition, the Patent Liaisons shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of each Party’s [**], as applicable (the foregoing referred to herein as the “Patent Strategy”); provided, however, for clarity, all final decisions related to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense of any Patents included in the GSK Prosecuted Patents, Mersana Product-Related Patents or Joint Arising Technology shall be made by the Party with the right to control such prosecution, maintenance, enforcement or defense, as applicable, as set forth in Article 13 (Intellectual Property) and subject to the terms and conditions therein. Any dispute regarding whether any given Know-How or Patent qualifies as Platform-Specific Arising Know-How, a Platform-Specific Arising Patent, Product-Specific Arising Know-How, a Product-Specific Arising Patent, GSK Arising Technology, Mersana Arising Technology or Joint Arising Technology shall be resolved pursuant to Article 18 (Dispute Resolution).

Related to Patent Liaisons

  • Patent Listings Licensee shall have the right and responsibility to make all filings with Regulatory Authorities in the Territory with respect to the AstraZeneca Patents, including as required or allowed (i) in the United States, in the FDA’s Orange Book and (ii) in the European Union, under the national implementations of Article 10.1(a)(iii) of Directive 2001/EC/83 or other international equivalents; provided that Licensee shall consult with AstraZeneca to determine the course of action with respect to such filings.

  • Joint Patents With respect to any potentially patentable Joint Invention, AstraZeneca shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to prepare patent applications based on such Joint Invention, to file and prosecute (including defense of any oppositions, interferences, reissue proceedings and reexaminations) such patent applications, and to maintain any Joint Patents issuing therefrom, in any jurisdictions throughout the Territory. FibroGen shall have the corresponding first right, but not the obligation, in any jurisdictions outside of the Territory other than China, in respect of which the China Agreement shall govern. If AstraZeneca determines in its sole discretion to abandon, cease prosecution or otherwise not file or maintain any Joint Patent anywhere in the Territory, then AstraZeneca shall provide FibroGen written notice of such determination at least thirty (30) days before any deadline for taking action to avoid abandonment (or other loss of rights) and shall provide FibroGen with the opportunity to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain such Joint Patent. The Party that is responsible for preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining a particular Joint Patent (the “Prosecuting Party”) shall provide the other Party reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such prosecution efforts regarding such Joint Patent, and such other Party shall provide the Prosecuting Party reasonable assistance in such efforts. The Prosecuting Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of all material communications from any patent authority in the applicable jurisdictions regarding the Joint Patent being prosecuted by such Party, and shall provide drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities a reasonable amount of time in advance of submitting such filings or responses. In particular, each Party agrees to provide the other Party with all information necessary or desirable to enable the other Party to comply with the duty of candor/duty of disclosure requirements of any patent authority. Either Party may determine that it is no longer interested in supporting the continued prosecution or maintenance of a particular Joint Patent in a country or jurisdiction, in which case: (i) the disclaiming Party shall, if requested in writing by the other Party, assign its ownership interest in such Joint Patent in such country or jurisdiction to the other Party for no additional consideration; and (ii) if such assignment is effected, any such Joint Patent would thereafter be deemed a FibroGen Patent in the case of assignment to FibroGen, or a AstraZeneca Patent in the case of assignment to AstraZeneca; provided, however, that the disclaiming party would have an immunity from suit under such FibroGen Patent or AstraZeneca Patent, as the case may be, in the applicable country or jurisdiction. In addition, any Joint Patent that becomes a FibroGen Patent pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be excluded from the license granted to AstraZeneca in Section 7.1. Each Party shall bear its own internal costs in respect of the prosecution of Joint Patents. Out-of-pocket costs incurred in respect of the prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patents in the Territory shall be borne equally by AstraZeneca and FibroGen. In the event a Party elects to disclaim its interest in a Joint Patent, the costs incurred with respect to such Patent after the date of such disclaimer shall thereafter be borne exclusively by the other Party, without reimbursement or credit.

  • Patent Applications It is understood by the parties that, pursuant to the Baylor Technology Transfer Agreement, MAS has the initial responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of Patents and Patent Applications covering the Baylor Technology. The parties agree that, as between MAS and CTI, MAS shall be responsible for deciding whether and how to file, prosecute and maintain the Patents and Patent Applications, provided that:

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

  • Patents and Inventions The Contractor shall promptly and fully report to the Department any discovery or invention arising out of or developed in the course of performance of this Agreement. If the services under this Agreement are supported by a federal grant of funds, the Contractor shall promptly and fully report to the federal government for the federal government to make a determination as to whether patent protection on such invention shall be sought and how the rights in the invention or discovery, including rights under any patent issued thereon, shall be disposed of and administered in order to protect the public interest.

  • Joint Patent Rights With respect to any potentially patentable Joint Invention, the Parties shall confer and agree upon which Party, if any, shall prepare, file, Prosecute (including any interferences, reissue proceedings, and other administrational proceedings) and Maintain patent applications covering such Joint Invention (any such patent application and any patents issuing therefrom a “Joint Patent Right”), at the responsible Party’s expense. It is the intention of the Parties that, unless otherwise agreed in writing, ATI would prepare, file, Prosecute and Maintain any Joint Patent Rights. The Party that Prosecutes a patent application in the Joint Patent Rights (the “Prosecuting Party”) shall provide the other Party reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such Prosecution efforts regarding the applicable Joint Patent Rights in the particular jurisdictions, and such other Party shall provide the Prosecuting Party reasonable assistance in such efforts. The Prosecuting Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of all material communications from any patent authority in the applicable jurisdictions regarding the Joint Patent Rights being Prosecuted by such Party, and shall provide drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities a reasonable amount of time in advance of submitting such filings or responses. In particular, each Party agrees to provide the other Party with all information necessary to enable the other Party to comply with the duty of candor/duty of disclosure requirements of any patent authority. Should ATI determine that it will no longer support the continued Prosecution or Maintenance of a particular Joint Patent Right in a country or jurisdiction, ATI shall provide Rigel with written notice of such determination at least thirty (30) Business Days prior to any deadline for taking action to avoid abandonment of such Joint Patent Right. Rigel shall have the right, but not ***Text Omitted and Filed Separately Confidential Treatment Requested Under 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and 230.406 obligation, to file, Prosecute and Maintain such Joint Patent Rights in the applicable jurisdiction at Rigel’s expense.

  • Patent Prosecution 7.1 UFRF shall diligently prosecute and maintain the Licensed Patents using counsel of its choice. UFRF shall provide Licensee with copies of all patent applications amendments, and other filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and foreign patent offices. UFRF will also provide Licensee with copies of office actions and other communications received by UFRF from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and foreign patent offices relating to Licensed Patents. Licensee agrees to keep such information confidential.

  • Patent Costs Within 30 days after receiving a statement from Stanford, ***** will reimburse Stanford:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.