Performance Test Tool Design Sample Clauses

Performance Test Tool Design. 11 2.1.1 General Principles 11 2.1.2 Generic Design 11 2.1.3 Communication Bus 11 2.2 Instantiation Process 12 2.2.1 Performance Testing Tool Container 12 2.2.2 Orchestration Process with Performance Test Tool 12 2.2.3 Session Teardown 14 2.3 Test Execution Process 14 2.4 Communication between modules 15 2.5 Test Tool Configuration 16 3 Performance Test Tool Modules Functionalities 18 3.1 CoAP Server 18 3.2 Passive Monitoring 18 4 Conclusion 20 5 References 21 6 Annex 22
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Test Tool Design. 11 2.1.1 General Principles 11 2.1.2 Generic Design 12 2.1.3 Communication Bus 12 2.2 Instantiation Process 12 2.2.1 Performance Testing Tool Container 12 2.2.2 Orchestration Process with Performance Test Tool 13 2.2.3 Session Teardown 14 2.3 Test Execution Process 14 2.4 Communication between modules 15 2.5 Test Tool Configuration 16 2.5.1 Static Configuration Parameters 17 2.5.2 Dynamic Configuration Parameters 18 2.5.3 Configuration with the F-Interop GUI 19 3 Performance Test Tool Modules Functionality 211 3.1 Timeline Controller 21 3.2 CoAP Client Emulation 21 3.3 Impairment Generator 21 3.4 Passive Monitoring 22 4 Future Developments 23 5 References 24 6 Annex 25 6.1 Configuration Files 25 6.2 Example of a Test Session 35 List of Figures Figure 1 - F-Interop remote testing architecture 10 Figure 2 - Timeline Example 11 Figure 3 - Orchestration process of a Test Tool 13 Figure 4 - Message flow during test execution 15 Figure 5 - Example of the message format 16 Figure 6 – Example of Timeline with disabled parameters 20 Figure 7 – New Test Session 35 Figure 8Test Selection 36 Figure 9Resource Management 37 Figure 10 - Test Configuration 38 Figure 11 – Deploying the Test 39 Figure 12Test Start 40 Figure 13 – Test and Verdict 41 List of Tables Table 1 - F-Interop Session 9 Table 2 - Messages used by the Performance Test Tool 16 Table 3 - Static Configuration Parameters 17 Table 4 - CoAP Request Parameters 18 Table 5 - Dynamic Configuration Parameters 18 Table 7 - CoAP Client Emulation Statistics 21 Table 7 - Impairment Statistics 21 Table 8 - Passive Monitoring Statistics 22 List of Acronyms ABC Attribute Based Credential CA Consortium Agreement CoAP Constrained Application Protocol ComSoc Communications Society DESCA Development of a Simplified Consortium Agreement DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol DHT Distributed Hash Tables DNS Domain Name System DNSSec Domain Name System Security Extensions DPA Data Protection Authorities DPO Data Protection Officer EC European Commission ENISA European Union Agency for Network and Information Security ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute EU European Union FP7 Seventh Framework Programme GA Grand Agreement GA General Assembly GPS Global Positioning System HTTPS Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure ICT Information and Communication Technologies ID Identifier IEC International Electrotechnical Commission IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IERC European Research Cluster ...

Related to Performance Test Tool Design

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority

  • Acceptance/Performance Test 4.7.1 Prior to synchronization of the Power Project, the SPD shall be required to get the Project certified for the requisite acceptance/performance test as may be laid down by Central Electricity Authority or an agency identified by the central government to carry out testing and certification for the solar power projects.

  • Performance Improvement Xxxxxx Permanente and the Coalition are competing in a challenging market that is characterized by a limited workforce, changes in technology, changes in clinical practice, cultural diversity, changing demographics and high demand for quality service. The parties are committed to the enhancement of organizational performance so that working in Partnership is the way Xxxxxx Permanente does business. Under this Agreement, the parties will work together to: » develop and invest in people, including the development of and investment in managers, supervisors and union stewards; » engage employees at all levels; » align the systems and processes that support the achievement of organizational and Partnership goals; » enhance the ability of Coalition unions to advance their social mission and the welfare of their members; » recognize and reduce parallel structures; » ensure joint management-union accountability for performance; » grow membership; » redesign work processes to improve effectiveness, efficiency and work environment; » develop and xxxxxx unit-based teams; » share and establish expectations regarding broad adoption of successful practices in areas such as service, attendance, workplace safety, workforce development, cost structure reduction, scope of practice and performance-based pay; and » communicate with employees on an ongoing basis regarding performance goals and targets, as well as performance results at all levels of the organization. Each regional LMP council shall develop approaches aimed at reducing variation between medical centers, facilities and departments in the resources available for partnership. In particular, such a plan should: » ensure at a regional level there is adequate time for teams to review performance, identify opportunities for improvement, and develop and test changes to drive improvement; and » provide regional or facility support to departments as needed to cross-cover or backfill and jointly determine the most cost-effective manner to provide the support.

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • Software Components At any time during the contract period of performance, the Government may require the Contractor to remedy any failure of the software to comply with the requirements of this contract. Support shall consist of correction of errors, provision of modifications, improvements, and other products the original manufacturer makes available to the Government without charge. The Government shall also be provided full documentation of changes and/or modifications to the software provided to meet the Government's requirements.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.