PRIORITY POOL Sample Clauses

PRIORITY POOL. 12.03.1 (i) Priority in the allocation of available teaching assistantships shall be given to full-time Ph.D. students who, at the time of hiring, have held one teaching assistantship or portion thereof, whether as a Masters student or as a Ph.D. student, but not more than five full teaching assistantships as a Ph.D. student. Priority shall be granted for no more than one full teaching assistantship in a twelve-month period; possible exceptions are noted below. Teaching assistantship appointments shall be counted as part of an individual’s Priority Pool entitlement in proportion to a full teaching assistantship as defined in Article 10.02.1, to a maximum of one full teaching assistantship in any academic year. NOTE: Priority per (i) entitles a qualified full-time Ph.D. student to a maximum of one full teaching assistantship (subject to availability) in each of up to six years while a full-time Ph.D. student, provided that the student is successful in obtaining an initial teaching assistantship. Any teaching assistantship(s) held while a Masters student will not reduce the priority while a Ph.D. student. Such priority is subject to (ii) and (iii) below.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PRIORITY POOL. 12 .03 .1 (i) Priority in the allocation of available teaching assistantships shall be given to full‑time Ph .D . students who, at the time of hiring, have held one teaching assistantship or portion thereof, whether as a Masters student or as a Ph .D . student, but not more than five full teaching assistantships as a Ph .D . student . Priority shall be granted for no more than one full teach‑ ing assistantship in a twelve‑month period; possible exceptions are noted below . Teaching assistantship appointments shall be counted as part of an individual’s Priority Pool entitlement in proportion to a full teach‑ ing assistantship as defined in Article 10 .02 .1, to a maximum of one full teaching assistantship in any academic year . NOTE: Priority per (i) entitles a qualified full‑time Ph .D . student to a maximum of one full teaching assistantship (subject to availability) in each of up to six years while a full‑time Ph .D . student, provided that the student is successful in obtaining an initial teaching assistantship . Any teaching assistantship(s) held while a Masters student will not reduce the priority while a Ph .D . student . Such priority is subject to (ii) and (iii) below .
Sample 1Sample 2
PRIORITY POOL. 13.01.01 A priority pool for hiring of Invigilators shall be established based on the following categories:
Sample 1
PRIORITY POOL. 28 Right of First Refusal.......................................................... 28 Notification of Applicants for Positions.............................. 29 Written Offer of Appointment............................................. 29
Sample 1
PRIORITY POOL. 13.01.01 A priority pool for hiring of Invigilators shall be established based on the following categories: ⮚ Category 1. New applicants who have never previously worked as an Invigilator at XxXxxx University. ⮚ Category 2. Returning applicants from other Hiring Units. ⮚ Category 3. Returning applicants who have previously invigilated in the Hiring Unit. ⮚ Category 4. Returning applicants who have passed their probationary period in the Hiring Unit. Hiring priority shall be given by Hiring Unit; Category 4 applicants have the highest hiring priority, followed by Category 3, and finally Category 2. Only after these categories are exhausted may new applicants (Category 1) be appointed. In selecting new applicants, preference may be given to McGill students. If not all Category 4 applicants can be offered a job, priority shall be given based on number of shifts previously invigilated in that Hiring Unit during the last examination period from most to least.
Sample 1

Related to PRIORITY POOL

  • Seniority Roster The District shall maintain an updated seniority roster, indicating employee's class seniority and hire date seniority. Such rosters shall be available to CSEA.

  • Priority If the Managing Underwriter or Underwriters of any proposed Underwritten Offering advise the Partnership that the total amount of Registrable Securities that the Selling Holders and any other Persons intend to include in such offering exceeds the number that can be sold in such offering without being likely to have an adverse effect on the price, timing or distribution of the Common Units offered or the market for the Common Units, then the Common Units to be included in such Underwritten Offering shall include the number of Registrable Securities that such Managing Underwriter or Underwriters advise the Partnership can be sold without having such adverse effect, with such number to be allocated (i) first, to the Partnership, (ii) second, to Teekay and its Affiliates pursuant to any registration rights existing as of the date of this Agreement and (iii) third, pro rata among the Selling Holders who have requested participation in such Underwritten Offering and any other holder of securities of the Partnership (other than Teekay and its Affiliates) having rights of registration that are neither expressly senior nor subordinated to the Registrable Securities (the “Parity Securities”). The pro rata allocations pursuant to clause (iii) above for each Selling Holder who has requested participation in such Underwritten Offering shall be the product of (a) the aggregate number of Registrable Securities proposed to be sold in such Underwritten Offering multiplied by (b) the fraction derived by dividing (x) the number of Registrable Securities owned on the Closing Date by such Selling Holder by (y) the aggregate number of Registrable Securities owned on the Closing Date by all Selling Holders who have requested participation in such Underwritten Offering plus the aggregate number of Parity Securities owned on the Closing Date by all holders of Parity Securities that are participating in the Underwritten Offering.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.