Probable Cause Determinations Clause Samples
A Probable Cause Determinations clause establishes the process by which a party or designated authority assesses whether sufficient grounds exist to believe a violation or breach has occurred. Typically, this involves a preliminary review of facts or evidence before proceeding with formal actions such as investigations, disciplinary measures, or legal proceedings. By setting clear criteria and procedures for making these determinations, the clause helps ensure fairness and prevents unwarranted or arbitrary actions, thereby protecting the interests of all parties involved.
Probable Cause Determinations. (i) Within 90 days of the Effective Date, JCMSC shall revise its policies, procedures, and practices to require that prior to detaining any Child, Juvenile Court Magistrates make a determination that there is probable cause that: (1) a delinquent act was committed, (2) the named Child committed the delinquent act alleged, and (3) the alleged delinquent act is one for which Tennessee statutes and JCMSC policy permit the use of detention.
(ii) Within 90 days of the Effective Date, JCMSC shall revise its policies, procedures, and practices to provide Children arrested without a warrant a Probable Cause Determination to detain within 48 hours of the warrantless arrest.
(iii) Within 90 days of the Effective Date, JCMSC shall revise its policies, procedures, and practices to ensure that no Child is detained for more than 48 hours prior to the Detention Hearing if the Court has not made a Probable Cause Determination.
(iv) Within 90 days of the Effective Date, JCMSC shall ensure that every Child has a meaningful opportunity to test the existence of probable cause during his or her Probable Cause Determination by revising its policies practices and procedures to:
a. Appoint a defense attorney to represent any indigent Child or Child whose indigence cannot be readily determined in advance of the Probable Cause Determination. Children must be presumed indigent unless information to the contrary is provided to JCMSC;
b. Require the government to prove the existence of probable cause with reliable evidence such as a live witness or an Affidavit of Complaint completed and sworn to by a law enforcement officer with firsthand knowledge of the incident leading to the arrest of the Child or by an officer who communicates with a reliable source who has firsthand knowledge of the incident leading to the child’s arrest;
c. Allow defense attorneys an opportunity to challenge the government’s evidence of probable cause, by cross-examining witnesses, presenting alternative testimony, or by any other appropriate means; and
d. Require that a record be maintained, reflecting when defense counsel was appointed, the forms of evidence used, and whether the defense attorney challenged such evidence or presented alternative evidence. Such record should be accessible from the information and recording system.
(v) Each month, the Judge, or his or her designee, shall review a sampling of Case Files to determine whether the procedures for Probable Cause Determinations are being followed as ...
Probable Cause Determinations. In addition to the enumerated acts set forth in CBA Article 21(G)(5), serious misconduct shall also include actions that would constitute a class A-I or A-II felony or any felony defined as a violent felony offense in NY Penal Law § 70.