Common use of Procedure Regarding Reappointment and Non Clause in Contracts

Procedure Regarding Reappointment and Non. Reappointment 1. Faculty members, except those appointed with fixed length appointments, shall automatically be considered for reappointment unless they indicate in writing to the department chairperson or director their intent to resign at the end of the current appointment. 2. The department chairperson or director shall inform the appropriate peer committee that a faculty member is eligible for consideration for reappointment. Said committees shall be designated by the full-time faculty of the department, division or other appropriate unit and instructed by the University as to their responsibilities at least four weeks prior to the date for submission of the committee's recommendation in the case of first and second year faculty members and at least six (6) weeks prior to the date for submission of the committee's recommendation in the case of faculty members beyond their second year of service. Failure of the peer committee to comply with its responsibilities under this Article shall not constitute the basis for a grievance where such instructions have been timely provided by the University. No person to whom a peer committee makes a recommendation shall be a voting member of that peer committee nor shall any person serving on a regular, interim or acting basis in the following capacity: Assistant Xxxx, Associate Xxxx, Xxxx, Assistant Xxxxxxx, Associate Provost, Provost, Assistant Vice President, Associate Vice President, members of the classified staff and / or students, or Vice President. The functions of administrators attending peer committee meetings shall be to serve as a resource to the committee and/or to acquire discipline based knowledge. Administrators serving as a resource to the committee shall not have voting rights within the peer committee. 3. In its consideration of the faculty member for reappointment, the peer committee shall: a. have access to the faculty member's personnel file, as provided in Article 6, Personnel File; and b. provide the faculty member with an opportunity to meet with and address the committee. c. All reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members participating in the report. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 4. The peer committee shall then forward its written recommendation regarding reappointment to the faculty member and department chairperson or director at least two (2) months prior to that date for notice of non- reappointment which is appropriate to the faculty member's length of service, as described in Section D of this Article, except that in the case of faculty members in the first year of service, the peer committee shall forward its recommendations by no later than January 15. Within one (1) week of the receipt of the recommendation by the chairperson or director, the faculty member may prepare a written response to the recommendation. The response, if any, will go forward with the recommendation. There shall be no further opportunity to submit materials for the review process except: a. in extraordinary circumstances; b. to correct factual errors in the material submitted; c. to receive outside evaluations solicited during the review process which are received prior to the decision by the chief administrative officer. In the event of such additional materials, the reappointment consideration shall be remanded to the peer committee for reconsideration except by mutual agreement of the University and unit member involved. In such event, appropriate revisions will be made to any deadlines for peer committee and/or University actions described in this Article. The unit member will be informed in writing of the new deadlines. An effort will be made to adhere to the notice requirements of Article 7, Section D. d. as provided for in paragraph 5 below. 5. Such administrative officers as the University deems appropriate shall make recommendations to the chief administrative officer regarding the reappointment of the faculty member. Such recommendations will be communicated in writing to the unit member at the same time they are forwarded. Upon conclusion of the administrative levels of review and prior to review by the Chief Administrative Officer, the unit member shall have an opportunity to submit a response to these recommendations. The unit member shall be accorded five

Procedure Regarding Reappointment and Non. Reappointment 1. Faculty members, except those appointed with fixed length appointments, shall automatically be considered for reappointment unless they indicate in writing to the department chairperson or director their intent to resign at the end of the current appointment. 2. The department chairperson or director shall inform the appropriate peer committee that a faculty member is eligible for consideration for reappointment. Said committees shall be designated by the full-time faculty of the department, division or other appropriate unit and instructed by the University as to their responsibilities at least four weeks prior to the date for submission of the committee's recommendation in the case of first and second year faculty members and at least six (6) weeks prior to the date for submission of the committee's recommendation in the case of faculty members beyond their second year of service. Failure of the peer committee to comply with its responsibilities under this Article shall not constitute the basis for a grievance where such instructions have been timely provided by the University. No person to whom a peer committee makes a recommendation shall be a voting member of that peer committee nor shall any person serving on a regular, interim or acting basis in the following capacity: Assistant Xxxx, Associate Xxxx, Xxxx, Assistant Xxxxxxx, Associate Provost, Provost, Assistant Vice President, Associate Vice President, members of the classified staff and / or students, or Vice President. The functions of administrators attending peer committee meetings shall be to serve as a resource to the committee and/or to acquire discipline based knowledge. Administrators serving as a resource to the committee shall not have voting rights within the peer committee. 3. In its consideration of the faculty member for reappointment, the peer committee shall: a. have access to the faculty member's personnel file, as provided in Article 6, Personnel File; and b. provide the faculty member with an opportunity to meet with and address the committee. c. All reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members participating in the report. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 4. The peer committee shall then forward its written recommendation regarding reappointment to the faculty member and department chairperson or director at least two (2) months prior to that date for notice of non- non-reappointment which is appropriate to the faculty member's length of service, as described in Section D of this Article, except that in the case of faculty members in the first year of service, the peer committee shall forward its recommendations by no later than January 15. Within one (1) week of the receipt of the recommendation by the chairperson or director, the faculty member may prepare a written response to the recommendation. The response, if any, will go forward with the recommendation. There shall be no further opportunity to submit materials for the review process except: a. in extraordinary circumstances; b. to correct factual errors in the material submitted; c. to receive outside evaluations solicited during the review process which are received prior to the decision by the chief administrative officer. In the event of such additional materials, the reappointment consideration shall be remanded to the peer committee for reconsideration except by mutual agreement of the University and unit member involved. In such event, appropriate revisions will be made to any deadlines for peer committee and/or University actions described in this Article. The unit member will be informed in writing of the new deadlines. An effort will be made to adhere to the notice requirements of Article 7, Section D. d. as provided for in paragraph 5 below.D. 5. Such administrative officers as the University deems appropriate shall make recommendations to the chief administrative officer regarding the reappointment of the faculty member. Such recommendations will be communicated in writing to the unit member at the same time they are forwarded. Upon conclusion of the administrative levels of review and prior to review by the Chief Administrative Officer, the unit member shall have an opportunity to submit a response to these recommendations. The unit member has no right to respond to or grieve a negative recommendation until formally notified of the decision by the chief administrative officer. The grievance, if any, shall be accorded fivefiled at the administrative level where the first negative recommendation was made. 6. The decision as to whether the faculty member shall be reappointed shall rest with the chief administrative officer. The chief administrative officer shall inform the faculty member of his or her decision and shall promptly supply written reasons upon the request of the faculty member.