PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. 2. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Certification bodies: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification, — members of the IECEE CB Scheme — accredited by the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand (XXX-ANZ), or — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreement, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.
Appears in 2 contracts
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New ZealandAustralia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification Inspection bodies operating according to in accordance with the requirements of EN 45011 45004 or ISO Guides 28 and 40Guide 39, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. 2. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Certification bodies: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification, — members of the IECEE CB Scheme — accredited by the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand (XXX-ANZ), or — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreementNATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. (b) Testing laboratories operating according to the requirements of EN 45001 or ISO Guide 25, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Testing laboratories: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing, or — recognised within the IECE CB scheme, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. (b) Certification bodies — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification — membership of the IECEE CB scheme — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreement, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme.
Appears in 2 contracts
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New ZealandAustralia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives directives, and be are designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. 2. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Certification bodiesTesting laboratories operating according to the requirements of ISO Guide 25 or EN 45001, and either: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on CertificationCalibration and Testing, — members or (a) For the purposes of Article 10(5) of Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the IECEE CB Scheme laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, inspection bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39, and either: — accredited by the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand (XXX-ANZ)NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. (b) Inspection bodies operating according to the requirements of ISO Guide 39 or EN 45004, and either: — accredited by an accreditation body with bodies which XXX-ANZ has are signatories to a mutual recognition agreementEuropean Multilateral Agreement, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreementunder an equivalent accreditation scheme.
Appears in 2 contracts
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s regulatory requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New ZealandAustralia’s regulatory requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined principles set out in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies operating according Agreement The principles set out in the Annex to the requirements Agreement For testing laboratories: For testing laboratories: — The Administrator of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 Vehicle Standards may authorise officers from the Federal Office of Road Safety to supervise testing of vehicle components and 40vehicle systems specified in Section I of this Sectoral Annex. — The Administrator of Vehicle Standards, following advice from the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA) may designate laboratories to conduct tests on the vehicle and either: 1vehicle components specified in Section I of this Sectoral Annex. The following procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will are deemed to be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. 2. The following procedures are deemed — Technical services appointed under the provisions of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to be consistent with those set out the type approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, as amended by Council Directive 92/53/EEC, to conduct tests specified in the Annex to Australian Design Rules for Motor Vehicles and Trailers. — Laboratories accredited under national accreditation systems or recognised under the Agreement: (a) Certification bodies: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to provisions of the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification, Calibration and Testing. — members Bodies able to demonstrate competence and designated by the authorities listed in Section III. Conformity of Production: Conformity of Production: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. — The Administrator of Vehicle Standards may authorise suitably qualified officers of the IECEE CB Scheme Federal Office of Road Safety to conduct conformity assessments of vehicle component manufacturers in accordance with the requirements of Annex X of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type approval of motor vehicles and their trailers. — A certification body complying with harmonised standard EN 45012, and either qualified as such by the approval authority of a Member State itself, or accredited as such by a national accreditation organisation of a Member State and recognised by that Member State’s approval authority to conduct assessments to the ISO 9001 quality management standard as defined in Administrator’s Circular 0-13-2. — Further, the Administrator of Vehicle Standards may designate Conformity Assessment Bodies that have been accredited by the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand (XXX-ANZ), or — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreement, or — able ) to demonstrate competence by other means conduct assessments in accordance with Sections A and B the requirements of Annex X of Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the Annex laws of the Member States relating to the Agreementtype approval of motor vehicles and their trailers. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Appears in 2 contracts
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New ZealandAustralia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies Certification Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. 2. (a) Testing laboratories: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Certification bodies: — accredited accreditation by an accreditation bodies body which are signatories is a signatory to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification, — members of the IECEE CB Scheme — accredited by the Joint Accreditation System of Australia Calibration and New Zealand (XXX-ANZ)Testing, or — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreementANZ, or — ability to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements (b) Quality System Certification Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45012 or ISO Guide 62, and either: — accredited by XXX-ANZ, or (b) Certification Bodies: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. — able to demonstrate competence accreditation by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex an accreditation body which is a signatory to the Agreement.European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification;
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Agreement
