Proposed Award Sample Clauses

Proposed Award. A Tribunal shall, at the request of a disputing party, submit to the disputing parties a proposed award, before making an award, except an award issued pursuant to Article
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Award. The proposed award of Contract C18017 is the result of the evaluation of the following lots: • #1- National Representation: HUD regulatory and programmatic issues related to Public Housing Authorities, Public Housing Authority programs, and federal procurement guidelines. • Lot #2- National Representation (RAD): HUD regulatory and programmatic issues related to the Rental Assistance Demonstration Program. • Lot #3- National Representation (Section 18): HUD regulatory and programmatic issues related to Section 18 of the Housing Act of 1937, as amended. Xxxxxxx, Delafield & Wood LLP of Washington DC was the highest rated proposer for all three lots, thus MHA is requesting authorization to award one contract to the firm to provide legal services in the three specialty practice areas specified in Lots #1, #2 and #3. Following is listed all proposers, where each placed as the result of our evaluation, and Total Calculated Costs proposed for Lot #1: [Table No. 1] (1) Name of Proposer (2) Final Rank (3) Average Points Awarded (4) Total Calculated Proposed Costs* Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxx 1 83 $40,350 Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx 2 79 $32,000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxx LLP 3 77 $42,250 Proposer #4 4 76 $39,450 Proposer #5 5 74 $38,100 Proposer #6 6 71 $17,050 Proposer #7 7 67 $25,450 Proposer #8 8 65 $28,750 Proposer #9 9 63 $46,250 *Top-rated Responsive and Responsive Proposer Following is listed all proposers, where each placed as the result of our evaluation, and Total Calculated Costs proposed for Lot #2: [Table No. 2] (1) Name of Proposer (2) Final Rank (3) Average Points Awarded (4) Total Calculated Proposed Costs* Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxx 1 84 $40,350 Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx 2 80 $32,000 Fox Rothschild 3 78 $39,450 Proposer #4 4 77 $42,250 Proposer #5 5 75 $38,100 Proposer #6 6 67 $17,050 Proposer #7 7 67 $25,450 Proposer #8 8 65 $28,750 Proposer #9 9 59 $46,250 *Top-rated Responsive and Responsive Proposer Following is listed all proposers, where each placed as the result of our evaluation, and Total Calculated Costs proposed for Lot #3: [Table No. 3] (1) Name of Proposer (2) Final Rank (3) Average Points Awarded (4) Total Calculated Proposed Costs* Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxx 1 83 $40,350 Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx 2 79 $32,000 Fox Rothschild 3 76 $39,450 Proposer #4 4 75 $42,250 Proposer #5 5 74 $38,100 Proposer #6 6 71 $17,050 Proposer #7 7 67 $25,450 Proposer #8 8 59 $46,250 *Top-rated Responsive and Responsive Proposer Prepared By: 10.10.18
Sample 1

Related to Proposed Award

  • Award Award shall be made on an all-or-none total estimated bid basis to the lowest responsive and responsible Bidder.

  • Grant Award On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Triumph hereby agrees to make a grant (the “Grant”) to Grantee in the aggregate maximum amount of up to Two Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($200,000.00) (the “Maximum Grant Amount”) to provide partial funding for the Project.

  • Notice of Award Written notice documenting the award date that is posted on the County's web site (xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxx) and on the bulletin board located in the Division of Procurement, 4th floor, Xxx Xxxxxxxx Xx, SE, Leesburg, 20175.

  • Notification of Award 2.28.1 Prior to the expiration of the period of tender validity, the Procuring entity will notify the successful tenderer in writing that its tender has been accepted.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • Service Award Named Plaintiff may apply to the Court for a service award of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000). Subject to the Court’s approval, the service award shall be paid from the Settlement Fund ten (10) days after the Effective Date.

  • Award of Contract ITT 41.1 The maximum percentage by which quantities may be increased is: [15%] The maximum percentage by which quantities may be decreased is: [100%]

  • Direct Award 11.1. The framework public body should issue their complete brief in accordance with schedule 5 (Standard Terms of Supply) ensuring that the contractor is made aware that the requirement is a call-off under the framework and forward to the first ranked contractor for consideration. The contractor should review the brief and submit a short proposal along with pricing to the framework public body. The ranking positions are detailed in the table below.

  • METHOD OF AWARD Select a method of award below for vehicles built to specifications at the OEM factory, and/or pre-existing inventory, as applicable. Method of Award for Vehicles Built to Specifications at the OEM Factory: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and supply the total number of vehicles requested. Method of Award for Pre-Existing Inventory Vehicles: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and provide the total number of vehicles requested. Lowest price for each contractor responding to the mini-bid will be determined by calculating the sum of the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid for all vehicles bid (i.e., the Grand Total NYS Contract Price of Vehicles Bid). Lowest price, per vehicle (i.e., the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid), to multiple Contractors that can meet the specified delivery date.

  • Grant Amount The maximum amount payable by the State under this Agreement shall not exceed $2,000,000

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.