Prosecution by Licensee Sample Clauses

Prosecution by Licensee. If Caltech declines to file, prosecute or maintain Exclusively Licensed Patent Rights, then Licensee may elect to assume responsibility for such filing, prosecution or maintenance at its expense in the name of both Caltech and Licensee. Caltech agrees to fully cooperate with Licensee in filing, prosecuting, and maintaining any such patent applications and patents, and Caltech agrees to execute any documents as shall be necessary for such purpose, and not to impair in any way the patentability of any of the foregoing.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prosecution by Licensee. If Scripps elects not to file, prosecute or maintain any patent application or patent within the Scripps Patent Rights or pay any fee related thereto, in any country Scripps shall promptly notify Licensee of such election, but in no case later than sixty (60) prior to any required action relating to the filing, prosecution or maintenance of such patent application or patent. In such event, if Licensee elects to take over the filing, prosecution and/or maintenance of one or more patents or patent applications within the Scripps Patent Rights, Licensee shall have the right, at its option, to control the filing, prosecution and/or maintenance of any such patent applications or patents within the Scripps Patent Rights at its own expense. In which case Licensee shall keep Scripps reasonably informed on matters regarding such filing, prosecution and maintenance.
Prosecution by Licensee. If Caltech declines to file, prosecute or maintain a patent or patent application in the Exclusively Licensed Patent Rights, then Licensee may elect, if Caltech consents, to assume responsibility for such filing, prosecution or maintenance at its expense in Caltech’s name, with Caltech remaining the client of record with the prosecuting attorney(s). Licensee shall fully cooperate with any and all other licensees, if any, of the patent or patent application. Caltech agrees to fully cooperate with Licensee in filing, prosecuting, and maintaining any such patent applications and patents, and Caltech agrees to execute any documents as shall be necessary for such purpose, and not to impair in any way the patentability of any of the foregoing.
Prosecution by Licensee. If Licensor fails to prepare, file, prosecute, maintain or defend any of the Patents or other Licensed Technology, then Licensee shall have the right, but no obligation, to prepare, file, prosecute, maintain and defend the Patents and other Licensed Technology, solely within the Field of Use. Licensee may exercise such right by giving written notice to Licensor. Following the exercise of such right by Licensee, the conduct of the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and defense of that particular patent or patent application or item of the Licensed Technology will be under Licensee’s exclusive control and discretion. Following Licensee’s election to exercise such rights, Licensee is authorized to execute and record, on Licensor’s behalf, any document submitted to the USPTO or other governmental patent office that pertains to filing, prosecution, maintenance, or defense of that particular patent or patent application, including, without limitation, statements under 37 C.F.R. § 3.73(b), consents to reissue applications, and declarations. Licensee will consult with Licensor on such matters from time to time on Licensor’s reasonable request.
Prosecution by Licensee. Licensee may prosecute such infringement at its own expense and, if legally necessary, may join Penn as a party to such action. Licensee shall not settle or compromise any such suit in a manner that imposes any obligations or restrictions on Penn or grants any rights to the Penn Patent Rights without Penn’s prior written permission, not to be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in Section 7.3, financial recoveries from any such litigation will first be applied to reimburse Licensee for its litigation expenditures with additional recoveries being paid to Licensee, subject to a royalty due Penn based on the provisions of Article 3.
Prosecution by Licensee. Licensee may prosecute such infringement at its own expense and, if legally necessary, may join Penn as a party to such action. Licensee shall not settle or compromise any such suit in a manner that imposes any obligations or restrictions on Penn or grants any rights to the Penn Software without Penn’s prior written permission, not to be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in Section 6.3, financial recoveries from any such litigation will first be applied to reimburse Licensee for its litigation expenditures with additional recoveries being paid to Licensee.
Prosecution by Licensee. LICENSEE may prosecute such infringement at its own expense. LICENSEE shall not settle or compromise any such suit in a manner that imposes any obligations or restrictions on DREXEL or grants any rights to the Technical Information or the Patent Rights, without DREXEL’s prior written permission. Except as otherwise provided in Section 7.3, financial recoveries from any such litigation will first be applied to reimburse LICENSEE for its litigation expenditures with additional recoveries being paid to LICENSEE, subject to a royalty due DREXEL based on the provisions of Article 3.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prosecution by Licensee. Except as provided for in Section 4.1(b), Licensee shall have the exclusive right to Prosecute the Licensee New Nitric Oxide Patents, as Licensee determines in good faith, [***]. In the event that Licensee desires not to continue to Prosecute any of the Licensee New Nitric Oxide Patents, Licensee shall notify Novan sufficiently in advance of any deadlines to afford Novan an opportunity to request that Licensee continue the Prosecution of such Patent prior to such Patent lapsing or becoming abandoned. If Novan requests in writing that Licensee continue to Prosecute such Licensee New Nitric Oxide Patent, then Licensee will continue to do so in accordance with this Section 4.1(a), [***].
Prosecution by Licensee. Licensee may prosecute such infringement at its own expense. Licensee shall not settle or compromise any such suit in a manner that imposes any obligations or restrictions on Institute without Institute’s prior written permission, which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld (provided however that no permission shall be required for Licensee to grant a non-royalty bearing Sublicense as part of such settlement if Licensee reasonably determines that such grant is necessary or appropriate to avoid litigation or similar controversy). Financial recoveries from any such litigation will first be applied to reimburse Licensee for its litigation expenditures with additional recoveries being paid to Licensee, subject to a royalty due Institute based on the provisions of Article 3.
Prosecution by Licensee. In the event Licensor is unable to or elects not to commence action against the person or entity responsible for the alleged infringement or misappropriation within ninety (90) days of the date of Licensor’s becoming aware of such infringement, then Licensee may, but shall not be required to, prosecute the alleged infringement or threatened infringement. In such event, Licensee shall act in its own name and at its own expense. Expenses incurred by Licensee may be offset against Net Sales. Licensor shall cooperate with Licensee as reasonably requested including being named as a Party if necessary, at Licensee’s expense. If Licensor so desires, it may actively participate in such action at a later date, at its own expense. Any amounts recovered with respect to such an action shall be applied first to reimburse the Parties for their out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees in the prosecution of such infringement. The remainder shall be deemed Net Sales under this Agreement and be treated accordingly, to the extent Licensee has not already offset Net Sales by its expenses.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!