Common use of Question Answer Clause in Contracts

Question Answer. 1. Who is/are the incumbent consultant(s) and how long have they been in place? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance has the following current contracts: DMS 13/14-018A with Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services; DMS 13/14-018B with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services and DMS 13/14-018C with Mercer to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services. The contract effective dates for the Division of State Group Insurance contracts are: DMS 13/14-018A: 7/23/2014 DMS 13/14-018B: 8/29/2014 DMS 13/14-018C: 7/23/2014 The Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement has the following current contracts: DMS 17/18- 004 with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx and DMS 10/11-015 with Milliman to provide actuarial services. The contract effective dates for the Division of Retirement contracts are: DMS 17/18-004: 9/18/2018 DMS 10/11-015: 7/1/2011 2. Why did DMS decide to bid these services at this time? Reference RFP subsection 1.1, Objective. 3. Are the services outlined in RFP comparable to those currently being provided by the incumbent consultant(s)? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department’s current contracts for independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services are specific to the Department’s needs. The three service categories have been broadened for this procurement to accommodate the needs of multiple customers under the awarded state term contract(s). 4. What were the total consulting fees for these services during each of the last three years? What were the fees by Service Category – Benefits Consulting, Actuarial, and Claim Audit? Reference RFP subsection 1.2,

Question Answer. 1. Who is/are the incumbent consultant(s) and how long have they been in place? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance has the following current contracts: DMS 13/14-018A with Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services; DMS 13/14-018B with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services and DMS 13/14-018C with Mercer to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services. The contract effective dates for the Division of State Group Insurance contracts are: DMS 13/14-018A: 7/23/2014 DMS 13/14-018B: 8/29/2014 DMS 13/14-018C: 7/23/2014 The Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement has the following current contracts: DMS 17/18- 004 with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx and DMS 10/11-015 with Milliman Xxxxxxxx to provide actuarial services. The contract effective dates for the Division of Retirement contracts are: DMS 17/18-004: 9/18/2018 DMS 10/11-015: 7/1/2011 2. Why did DMS decide to bid these services at this time? Reference RFP subsection 1.1, Objective. 3. Are the services outlined in RFP comparable to those currently being provided by the incumbent consultant(s)? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department’s current contracts for independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services are specific to the Department’s needs. The three service categories have been broadened for this procurement to accommodate the needs of multiple customers under the awarded state term contract(s). 4. What were the total consulting fees for these services during each of the last three years? What were the fees by Service Category – Benefits Consulting, Actuarial, and Claim Audit? Reference RFP subsection 1.2,

Question Answer. 1. Who is/are the incumbent consultant(s) and how long have they been in place? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance has the following current contracts: DMS 13/14-018A with Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services; DMS 13/14-018B with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services and DMS 13/14-018C with Mercer Xxxxxx to provide an independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services. The contract effective dates for the Division of State Group Insurance contracts are: DMS 13/14-018A: 7/23/2014 DMS 13/14-018B: 8/29/2014 DMS 13/14-018C: 7/23/2014 The Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement has the following current contracts: DMS 17/18- 004 with Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx and DMS 10/11-015 with Milliman to provide actuarial services. The contract effective dates for the Division of Retirement contracts are: DMS 17/18-004: 9/18/2018 DMS 10/11-015: 7/1/2011 2. Why did DMS decide to bid these services at this time? Reference RFP subsection 1.1, Objective. 3. Are the services outlined in RFP comparable to those currently being provided by the incumbent consultant(s)? The services sought in this procurement are not currently provided as a state term contract for the State of Florida. The Department’s current contracts for independent benefits consultant, actuarial and auditing services are specific to the Department’s needs. The three service categories have been broadened for this procurement to accommodate the needs of multiple customers under the awarded state term contract(s). 4. What were the total consulting fees for these services during each of the last three years? What were the fees by Service Category – Benefits Consulting, Actuarial, and Claim Audit? Reference RFP subsection 1.2,