Rate Models Used to Analyze the 2012 REP Settlement Sample Clauses

Rate Models Used to Analyze the 2012 REP Settlement. ‌ 24 BPA modified the existing RAM, RAM2012, to examine the effect of different resolutions of 25 issues in litigation on the amount of rate protection provided by section 7(b)(2) and the amount 26 of REP benefits that would paid after application of the 7(b)(2) alternatives. RAM2012 is the 1 detailed rate model used to calculate the BP-12 rates. RAM2012 has the capability of 2 developing rates based on either the Settlement or the 7(b)(2) rate test. In fact, RAM2012 is the 3 model that would be used to set rates using the section 7(b)(2) rate test had the Administrator 4 decided not to adopt the Settlement. However, RAM2012 in its current state cannot be used as 5 the sole model for analyzing the Settlement because it calculates rates for only the FY 2012– 6 2013 rate period. 7 8 To address the need for a long-term analysis of the Settlement, BPA developed a long-term rate 9 forecast model (LTRM) to produce estimates of rate protection amounts and REP benefits in the 10 absence of settlement. LTRM projects rates, including rate protection amounts and REP 11 benefits, for the full 17-year term of the Settlement. It is a scaled-down version of RAM2012 12 and performs many of the same functions as RAM2012 in the portions of the ratesetting process 13 necessary to analyze the Settlement. LTRM develops energy allocation factors in the same 14 manner as RAM2012 and allocates costs and credits to rate pools in the same manner as
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rate Models Used to Analyze the 2012 REP Settlement. Agreement 9 Staff modified the existing RAM2012 to examine the effect of different resolutions of issues in 10 litigation on the amount of rate protection provided by section 7(b)(2) and the amount of REP 11 benefits that would paid after application of the 7(b)(2) alternatives. RAM2012 is the detailed 12 rate model being used to calculate rates in the concurrent BP-12 rate proceeding. RAM2012 has 13 the capability of developing rates based on either the proposed Settlement or the 7(b)(2) rate test. 14 In fact, RAM2012 is the model that would be used to set rates using the 7(b)(2) rate test should 15 the Administrator decide not to adopt the Settlement. However, RAM2012 in its current state 16 cannot be used as the sole model for analyzing the Settlement. RAM2012 is limited to 17 calculating rates for only the FY 2012–2013 rate period. Although work is under way that would 18 allow RAM2012 to perform rate calculations for an extended period (currently envisioned to be 19 20 years), this work is not expected to be completed until after the end of both the REP-12 and 20 BP-12 proceedings. 21
Sample 1

Related to Rate Models Used to Analyze the 2012 REP Settlement

  • DATA USED FOR CALCULATIONS The calculations for payments under this Agreement shall be initially based upon the valuations that are placed upon all taxable property in the District, including the Applicant’s Qualified Property, by the Appraisal District in its annual certified tax roll submitted to the District for each Tax Year pursuant to TEXAS TAX CODE § 26.01 on or about July 25 of each year of this Agreement. Immediately upon receipt of the valuation information by the District, the District shall submit the valuation information to the Third Party selected and appointed under Section 4.3. The certified tax roll data shall form the basis of the calculation of any and all amounts due under this Agreement. All other data utilized by the Third Party to make the calculations contemplated by this Agreement shall be based upon the best available current estimates. The data utilized by the Third Party shall be adjusted from time to time by the Third Party to reflect actual amounts, subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s certified tax roll or any other changes in student counts, tax collections, or other data.

  • NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports In addition to other reports that may be required by this solicitation, the Contractor shall provide the following NASPO ValuePoint reports.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Measuring DNS parameters Every minute, every DNS probe will make an UDP or TCP “DNS test” to each of the public-­‐DNS registered “IP addresses” of the name servers of the domain name being monitored. If a “DNS test” result is undefined/unanswered, the tested IP will be considered unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • CMI/RAI MDS Report Recognizing the mutual objective of quality resident care, the Employer agrees to meet through the Union Management Committee with the Union as soon as practicable after the receipt of the annual CMI/RAI MDS report. The Employer agrees to provide the Union with staffing levels, and staffing mix information; the impact of related payroll costs on staffing levels and a written notice of the CMI/RAI MDS report for the facility. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the impact of the CMI/RAI MDS report on the staffing levels in the Home, quality resident care, and provide the Union with an opportunity to make representation in that regard. The parties shall meet as necessary to discuss other changes or workload issues. The parties may invite additional participants to attend the meeting to support constructive review and discussion.

  • MFMP Transaction Fee Reports The Contractor shall submit complete monthly MFMP Transaction Fee Reports to the Department. Reports are due 15 calendar days after the end of each month. Information on how to submit MFMP Transaction Fee Reports online can be located at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/business_operations/state_ purchasing/myfloridamarketplace/mfmp_vendors/transaction_fee_and_reporting. Assistance with transaction fee reporting is also available by email at xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or telephone at 866-FLA-EPRO (866-352- 3776) from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.