Reappointment Recommendation Sample Clauses

Reappointment Recommendation. All probationary and annual contract teachers shall be
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reappointment Recommendation. All probationary and annual contract teachers shall be 15 (8) Deadline: The date for completion of the teacher’s Final Performance Evaluation shall be May
Reappointment Recommendation. Administrators are encouraged to recommend the 6 reappointment of instructional staff with annual contract status who have demonstrated 7 positive performance. Evidence of positive performance may include, but is not limited to:

Related to Reappointment Recommendation

  • Reappointment In the event an ASF Member who has received severance pay is subsequently reappointed to a state university, future severance pay for the ASF Member shall be computed upon the individual’s unused sick leave balance accumulated since the reappointment.

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • Reappointments At least three (3) months prior to the completion of an employee’s initial probationary appointment to a Type B contract position, the employee will be advised of reappointment and the terms thereof, or will be advised that reappointment will not be made. A reappointment to a Type B contract position subsequent to the initial probationary period may be made for:

  • Conclusions and Recommendations For the reasons stated herein, Merrimack Energy concludes that the shortlisting decisions by PG&E in the 2007 RPS RFO were reasonable and based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Solicitation Protocol. The selection of the shortlist was very inclusive and erred on the side of including more offers in what was a very ample shortlist relative to the procurement target. In the Shortlist Report, Merrimack Energy recommended a number of changes to the RPS procurement process, several of which were adopted by PG&E in the 2008 RPS RFO. Despite recommending certain changes, our assessment is that the PG&E evaluation methodology was appropriate and that it was administered fairly and reasonably. Consistent with suggestions we had made in and after the Shortlist Report, PG&E developed a negotiation prioritization strategy with shortlisted bidders that created an active group of negotiations based on price and viability factors. The Mojave Solar bid was consistently placed in the secondary group and although its proposal changed over time from the proposal initially shortlisted, it remained in the secondary group during the course of contract negotiations. While the project sponsor is a very viable and experienced developer of solar thermal projects and is capable of developing the project effectively, there are concerns associated with the timing of the project that adds risk to the ultimate success of the project. PG&E has done an effective job in managing these risks through contract provisions in both the original contract and the amended and restated agreement. The details of the PPA and the amended and restated agreement are addressed in the confidential appendix to this report. The positive attributes of the project should be balanced against the negative attributes in assessing whether or not the amended and restated agreement should be approved. PG&E Gas and Electric Advice Filing List General Order 96-B, Section IV AT&T Department of Water Resources North Coast SolarResources Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx LLP Dept of General Services Northern California Power Association Ameresco Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxxxx & Brand OnGrid Solar Arizona Public Service Company Duke Energy Praxair BART Economic Sciences Corporation X. X. Xxxx & Associates Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx LLP RCS, Inc. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Associates Xxxxxx Farms Recurrent Energy Bloomberg X. X. Xxxxxx & Assoc. SCD Energy Solutions Bloomberg New Energy Finance GLJ Publications SCE Boston Properties GenOn Energy, Inc. SMUD Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxx, XxxXxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx XXXXX Brookfield Renewable Power Green Power Institute San Francisco Public Utilities Commission CA Bldg Industry Association Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Seattle City Light CLECA Law Office Hitachi Sempra Utilities CSC Energy Services In House Energy Sierra Pacific Power Company California Cotton Ginners & Growers Assn International Power Technology Silicon Valley Power California Energy Commission Intestate Gas Services, Inc. Silo Energy LLC California League of Food Processors Xxxxxxxx Berkeley National Lab Southern California Edison Company California Public Utilities Commission Los Angeles Dept of Water & Power Spark Energy, L.P. Calpine Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx & Scripps LLP Sun Light & Power Cardinal Cogen MAC Lighting Consulting Sunshine Design Xxxxxx, Xxxxx MBMC, Inc. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx MRW & Associates Tabors Caramanis & Associates City of Palo Alto Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Tecogen, Inc. City of Palo Alto Utilities XxXxxxxx & Associates Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. City of San Xxxx Xxxxxx Irrigation District TransCanada Clean Energy Fuels Modesto Irrigation District Turlock Irrigation District Coast Economic Consulting Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx United Cogen Commercial Energy Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx Utility Cost Management Consumer Federation of California NLine Energy, Inc. Utility Specialists Crossborder Energy NRG West Verizon Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Navigant Consulting Wellhead Electric Company Day Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Associates Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA)

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • Appointment Policy In making promotions and transfers, the qualifications and abilities of the employees concerned shall be the primary considerations, and where such factors are relatively equal, seniority shall be the determining factor.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!