Rebuttal Statements Sample Clauses
A Rebuttal Statements clause establishes the right for a party to formally respond to claims, allegations, or statements made by another party within a contractual or legal context. Typically, this clause outlines the timeframe and format in which a rebuttal must be submitted, and may specify the types of issues or proceedings where rebuttals are permitted, such as during dispute resolution or disciplinary actions. Its core function is to ensure fairness and due process by allowing each party an opportunity to present their side and counter any assertions made against them.
Rebuttal Statements. Within 14 days after receipt of a copy of the recorded hearing, the Grievant and/or the Respondent may submit a rebuttal statement. The rebuttal statement shall not include evidence that was not already presented in, or prior to, the grievance hearing, except that new documentation can be included if it directly contradicts oral testimony given at the hearing. The rebuttal statement must not exceed 5 (five) pages. No further submissions are permitted by the Panel unless extraordinary circumstances exist.
Rebuttal Statements. An employee may submit a rebuttal statement to material in his/her personnel file. Said rebuttal shall be attached to the material being rebutted and placed in the employee’s personnel file.
Rebuttal Statements. See Article 8.6.
Rebuttal Statements. Within 14 days after the hearing, the grievant and/or the respondent may submit a written rebuttal statement that includes responses to the opposing party’s oral presentation and to witness declarations given at the Grievance Panel hearing. The rebuttal statement should not generally exceed 5 (five) pages.
Rebuttal Statements. The Shipper Groups propose to allow the party pursuing arbitration to file a rebuttal statement within 5 days. The NCC disagrees with the need for a rebuttal statement, arguing (Response, at 14) that it would create needless delay. The NCC also argues that rebuttal is not needed because an arbitrator’s decision is to be based exclusively on the public docket record below and both parties will have an equal opportunity to explain why the NCC’s action was or was not correct.