Reconsideration, if Necessary Sample Clauses

Reconsideration, if Necessary. The faculty shall consider the xxxx’x written objections and, within thirty (30) days after receiving them, shall resubmit the bylaws to the xxxx, incorporating all, some, or none of the objections, along with a justification for the resubmitted language, which shall be written by a faculty member from the unit selected by faculty members in the unit. (1) If the faculty do not resubmit proposed bylaws within thirty (30) days after receiving the xxxx’x objections, the bylaws shall be adopted as modified consistent with the xxxx’x objections. (2) If the xxxx approves the reconsidered bylaws or does not respond within thirty (30) days after the xxxx’x receipt of them, the bylaws shall be adopted as resubmitted. (3) If the xxxx does not approve the reconsidered bylaws and the proposed changes impact the items specifically referenced in 9.1.b, the xxxx within thirty (30) days shall make final revisions to the reconsidered bylaws. The revisions may change only those portions of the reconsidered bylaws that are unreasonable or unworkable. The reconsidered bylaws shall be adopted as modified by the xxxx’x final revisions.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reconsideration, if Necessary. The faculty shall consider the xxxx’x written objections and, within thirty (30) days after receiving the xxxx’x objections, shall resubmit the bylaws to the xxxx, incorporating all, some, or none of the objections, along with a justification for the resubmitted language, which shall be written by a faculty member from the unit selected by the faculty members in the unit. (1) If the faculty of the unit do not resubmit proposed bylaws within thirty
Sample 1Sample 2
Reconsideration, if Necessary. The faculty shall consider the xxxx’x written objections and, within thirty (30) days after receiving the xxxx’x objections, shall resubmit the bylaws to the xxxx, incorporating all, some, or none of the objections, along with a justification for the resubmitted language, which shall be written by a faculty member from the unit selected by the faculty members in the unit. (1) If the faculty of the unit do not resubmit proposed bylaws within thirty (30) days after receiving the xxxx’x objections, the bylaws shall be adopted as modified consistent with the xxxx’x objections. (2) If the xxxx approves the reconsidered bylaws or does not respond within thirty (30) days after the xxxx’x receipt of them, the bylaws shall be adopted as resubmitted. (3) If the xxxx does not approve the reconsidered bylaws then, and the proposed changes impact the items specifically referenced in 9.1.b, the xxxx within thirty (30) days shall make final revisions to the reconsidered bylaws. The revisions may only change those portions of the reconsidered bylaws that are unreasonable or unworkable. The reconsidered bylaws shall be adopted as modified by the xxxx’x final revisions. within thirty (30) days of the xxxx’x receipt of them, the xxxx shall notify the affected faculty, the Vice President for Human Resources, and the UFF/UF President. The xxxx shall forward to the Vice President for Human Resources and the UFF/UF President all documents relating to the development and disposition of those bylaws.
Sample 1

Related to Reconsideration, if Necessary

  • Reconsideration If We did not attempt to consult with Your Provider who recommended the Covered Service before making an adverse determination, the Provider may request reconsideration by the same clinical peer reviewer who made the adverse determination or a designated clinical peer reviewer if the original clinical peer reviewer is unavailable. For Preauthorization and concurrent reviews, the reconsideration will take place within one (1) business day of the request for reconsideration. If the adverse determination is upheld, a notice of adverse determination will be given to You and Your Provider, by telephone and in writing.

  • District’s Sole Discretion District in its sole discretion may terminate this Contract for any reason on 30 days’ written notice to Contractor.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Arbitrator Authority The arbitrator shall have the sole and exclusive authority to determine whether a dispute, claim or cause of action is subject to arbitration under this Section and to determine any procedural questions which grow out of such disputes, claims or causes of action and bear on their final disposition.

  • Franchise Tax Board Review (a) In addition to the reporting requirements in section 6, Taxpayer agrees to comply with the FTB’s review of the books and records for purposes of determining if Taxpayer has complied with the requirements of this Agreement. (b) For any business other than a Small Business, Taxpayer acknowledges that the FTB shall review the books and records of all taxpayers allocated a Credit pursuant to this Agreement to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and agrees to cooperate with the FTB in such a review. In the case of a taxpayer that is a Small Business, Taxpayer acknowledges that a review of the books and records of a taxpayer shall be made when, in the sole discretion of the FTB, a review of those books and records is appropriate and agrees to cooperate with the FTB in such a review. If the FTB exercises its discretion to review the books and records of a Small Business taxpayer, the review will be conducted to ensure compliance with this Agreement. The guidelines and procedures for these reviews are outlined in the FTB’s Notice #2014-2 dated November 7, 2014. (c) These reviews will not constitute an audit of the tax return under Part 10.2 (commencing with section 18401) of the RTC and the regulations thereunder, and will not preclude the FTB from auditing any issue in any taxable year, including a taxable year included in the term of this Agreement. (d) If during the review of the books and records, the FTB determines there is a potential material breach of this Agreement by Taxpayer, and notwithstanding RTC section 19542, the FTB shall notify GO-Biz and provide, in writing, detailed information regarding the basis for that determination.

  • Decision-Making Authority BMS shall have the sole decision-making authority for the operations and Commercialization strategies and decisions, including funding and resourcing, related to the Commercialization of Products; provided that such decisions are not inconsistent with the express terms and conditions of this Agreement, including BMS’ diligence obligations set forth in Section 5.1.

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

  • COOPERATION IN IMPLEMENTATION On demand of the other Spouse and without undue delay or expense, each Spouse shall execute, acknowledge, or deliver any instrument, furnish any information, or perform any other acts reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. If a Spouse fails to execute any document as required by this provision, the court may appoint the court clerk or his or her authorized designee to execute the document on that Xxxxxx’s behalf.

  • CFR PART 200 AND FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXPLANATION TIPS and TIPS Members will sometimes seek to make purchases with federal funds. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (sometimes referred to as “XXXXX”),Vendor's response to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will indicate Vendor's willingness and ability to comply with certain requirements which may be applicable to TIPS purchases paid for with federal funds, if accepted by Vendor. Your responses to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will dictate whether TIPS can list this awarded contract as viable to be considered for a federal fund purchase. Failure to certify all requirements labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will mean that your contract is listed as not viable for the receipt of federal funds. However, it will not prevent award. If you do enter into a TIPS Sale when you are accepting federal funds, the contract between you and the TIPS Member will likely require these same certifications.

  • Final Approval Hearing “Final Approval Hearing” shall mean the hearing at which the Court will consider and finally decide whether to enter the Final Judgment.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!