REQUEST FOR RELIEF. (a) The Operator shall be entitled to request relief from the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that its ability to perform such obligation is prevented by any Relief Event, notwithstanding the Operator using all reasonable endeavours and in accordance with Good Industry Practice to mitigate the effect of such Relief Event in its performance of its obligations under this Agreement.
(b) Any such relief request shall be made by service of a notice on the Authority within two (2) Business Days of the Operator becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the relevant Relief Event or, if later, of its failure to perform, containing such relevant information relating to the Relief Event and/or any failure to perform as is available to the Operator, including:
(i) full details of the circumstances giving rise to the Relief Event, including its nature, the date of its occurrence and its duration;
(ii) the effect of the Relief Event on the Operator’s ability to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, including details of the relevant obligations, the precise effect on each such obligation and the likely duration of that effect; and
(iii) an explanation of any measures that the Operator proposes or intends to adopt to mitigate the consequences of the Relief Event.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all members of the Collective Class, request the following relief:
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. For the reasons stated herein, Respondent , the Federal republic of Mekar requests that the Tribunal:
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. For the foregoing reasons, Peru requests that the Tribunal enter an order as follows: All communications among any of the Parties, including communications involving any of their representatives, shall be channeled solely in the manner indicated by each Party in the Terms of Appointment. The Parties shall abstain from any action or conduct that may result in an aggravation of the dispute. Correspondingly, the Parties shall respect the role of the non-disputing Party as established in the Treaty. In consultation with the Parties, the Tribunal shall establish in a procedural order pursuant to which the non-disputing Party may make certain submissions in a manner consistent with the Treaty.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. On the last day of the arbitration hearing, each Party shall submit to the arbitrator(s) and to each other a form of award, stating completely and in detail the relief sought in the arbitration, which may include an award of specific performance or injunctive relief (each a "Form of Award").
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. Initiate an investigation of Google’s use and the effect of its clickwrap agreement which requires any AdWords advertiser to bring a federal antitrust suit before 1 of 3 judges in San Jose, California rather than the other 675 federal district court judges throughout the United States, and especially in light of the fact that AdWords’ headquarters appears to be in Ann Arbor, Michigan or, more than likely, at 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. An employee selecting this Retirement Incentive Program who, after approval and/or the receiving of benefits, experiences a very unique change in his/her personal life situation, may apply to the Board of Education for relief of that decision. If relief is granted by the Board of Education, all Retirement Incentive Program monies must be repaid to the District by the employee as follows:
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. The ITIA and Xx Xxxxx jointly respectfully request XXX Cavalieros to:
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. 2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:
REQUEST FOR RELIEF. 34. Plaintiff requests that:
x. Xxxxxxx’x proposed acquisition of Foseco be adjudged and decreed to be unlawful and in violation of section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, 15 U.S.C. 18;
b. Defendants and all persons acting on their behalf be permanently enjoined and restrained from consummating the proposed acquisition or from entering into or carrying out any contract, agreement, plan, or understanding, the effect of which would be to combine Xxxxxxx with the operations of Foseco;
c. Plaintiff be awarded its costs for this action; and
d. Plaintiff receive such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, For Plaintiff United States of America: /s/ Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Assistant Attorney General DC Bar #426840. /s/ Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Chief, Litigation II Section D.C. Bar #435204. /s/ Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Deputy Assistant Attorney General DC Bar #414420. /s/ X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx II, Director of Operations and Civil Enforcement /s/ Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Assistant Chief, Litigation II Section DC Bar #439469 /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Litigation II Section 0000 X Xxxxxx, XX., Xxxxx 0000, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (202) 307–0924. Dated: March 4, 2008. The term ‘‘HHI’’ means the Xxxxxxxxxx- Xxxxxxxxx Index, a commonly accepted measure of market concentration. The HHI is calculated by squaring the market share of each firm competing in the market and then summing the resulting numbers. For example, for a market consisting of four firms with shares of 30, 30, 20, and 20 percent, the HHI is 2,600 (302+302+202+202=2,600). The HHI takes into account the relative size and distribution of the firms in a market. It approaches zero when a market is occupied by a large number of firms of relatively equal size and reaches its maximum of 10,000 when a market is controlled by a single firm. The HHI increases both as the number of firms in the market decreases and as the disparity in size between those firms increases. Markets in which the HHI is between 1000 and 1800 points are considered to be moderately concentrated, and markets in which the HHI is in excess of 1800 points are considered to be highly concentrated. Transactions that increase the HHI by more than 100 points in highly concentrated markets presumptively raise significant antitrust concerns under the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines. United States of America, Plaintiff, x....
