Common use of Required Sublicensing Clause in Contracts

Required Sublicensing. If Forty Seven directly or through its Affiliates or sublicensees is unable or unwilling to serve or develop a potential market or market territory for which there is a reputable company with adequate resources willing to be a sublicensee, and such sublicensee has provided Stanford and Forty Seven with a bona fide, detailed proposal to develop a Licensed Product for a potential market or potential territory that would not interfere with any existing or future Licensed Products of Forty Seven as reasonably demonstrated by Forty Seven in a written document to Stanford, then Forty Seven will, at Stanford’s request, negotiate in good faith a [*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Sublicense with any such sublicensee. Stanford would like licensees to address unmet needs, such as those of neglected patient populations or geographic areas, giving particular attention to improved therapeutics, diagnostics and agricultural technologies for the developing world, as applicable.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Exclusive (Equity) Agreement, Exclusive Agreement (Forty Seven, Inc.), Exclusive Agreement (Forty Seven, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!